Driving Accessibility: Shifting the Narrative & Design of Automated Vehicle Systems for Persons With Disabilities Through a Collaborative Scoring System

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02651v1
• Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 02:05:25 GMT
• Title: Driving Accessibility: Shifting the Narrative & Design of Automated Vehicle Systems for Persons With Disabilities Through a Collaborative Scoring System
• Authors: Savvy Barnes, Maricarmen Davis, Josh Siegel,
• Abstract summary: Underrepresented groups, including individuals with mobility impairments, sensory disabilities, and cognitive conditions, are often overlooked in crucial discussions on system design, implementation, and usability.<n>We aim to shift automated vehicle research and discourse away from this reactive model and toward a proactive and inclusive approach.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Automated vehicles present unique opportunities and challenges, with progress and adoption limited, in part, by policy and regulatory barriers. Underrepresented groups, including individuals with mobility impairments, sensory disabilities, and cognitive conditions, who may benefit most from automation, are often overlooked in crucial discussions on system design, implementation, and usability. Despite the high potential benefits of automated vehicles, the needs of Persons with Disabilities are frequently an afterthought, considered only in terms of secondary accommodations rather than foundational design elements. We aim to shift automated vehicle research and discourse away from this reactive model and toward a proactive and inclusive approach. We first present an overview of the current state of automated vehicle systems. Regarding their adoption, we examine social and technical barriers and advantages for Persons with Disabilities. We analyze existing regulations and policies concerning automated vehicles and Persons with Disabilities, identifying gaps that hinder accessibility. To address these deficiencies, we introduce a scoring rubric intended for use by manufacturers and vehicle designers. The rubric fosters direct collaboration throughout the design process, moving beyond an `afterthought` approach and towards intentional, inclusive innovation. This work was created by authors with varying degrees of personal experience within the realm of disability.

Related papers

• "Accessibility people, you go work on that thing of yours over there": Addressing Disability Inclusion in AI Product Organizations [15.672286378805234]
  We report on an interview study with 25 AI practitioners about how their work processes and artifacts may impact end users with disabilities.<n>We found that practitioners experienced friction when triaging problems at the intersection of responsible AI and accessibility practices.<n>We offer suggestions for new resources and process changes to better support people with disabilities as end users of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T16:08:42Z)
• Agentic Vehicles for Human-Centered Mobility [0.0]
  The paper introduces the concept of agentic vehicles (AgVs), vehicles that integrate agentic AI systems to reason, adapt, and interact within complex environments.<n>It suggests how AgVs can complement and even reshape conventional autonomy to ensure mobility services are aligned with user and societal needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T13:34:49Z)
• Towards Privacy-Aware and Personalised Assistive Robots: A User-Centred Approach [55.5769013369398]
  This research pioneers user-centric, privacy-aware technologies such as Federated Learning (FL) FL enables collaborative learning without sharing sensitive data, addressing privacy and scalability issues. This work includes developing solutions for smart wheelchair assistance, enhancing user independence and well-being.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T13:14:08Z)
• The RoboDrive Challenge: Drive Anytime Anywhere in Any Condition [136.32656319458158]
  The 2024 RoboDrive Challenge was crafted to propel the development of driving perception technologies. This year's challenge consisted of five distinct tracks and attracted 140 registered teams from 93 institutes across 11 countries. The competition culminated in 15 top-performing solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T17:59:57Z)
• Generative AI for Unmanned Vehicle Swarms: Challenges, Applications and Opportunities [84.00105187866806]
  Generative AI (GAI) offers great potential in solving these challenges of unmanned vehicle swarms. This paper presents an overview of unmanned vehicles and unmanned vehicle swarms as well as their use cases and existing issues. Then, we present a comprehensive review on the applications and challenges of GAI in unmanned vehicle swarms with various insights and discussions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T05:46:23Z)
• Driving Towards Inclusion: A Systematic Review of AI-powered Accessibility Enhancements for People with Disability in Autonomous Vehicles [4.080497848091375]
  We review inclusive human-computer interaction (HCI) within autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven cars with partial autonomy.<n>Key technologies discussed include brain-computer interfaces, anthropomorphic interaction, virtual reality, augmented reality, mode adaptation, voice-activated interfaces, haptic feedback, etc.<n>Building on these findings, we propose an end-to-end design framework that addresses accessibility requirements across diverse user demographics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T00:06:08Z)
• Why Autonomous Vehicles Are Not Ready Yet: A Multi-Disciplinary Review of Problems, Attempted Solutions, and Future Directions [43.389650174195914]
  The present review adopts an integrative and multidisciplinary approach to investigate the major challenges faced by the automative sector.<n>The review examines the limitations and risks associated with current technologies and the most promising solutions devised by the researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T16:41:18Z)
• The Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning Automated Driving Systems: A Review [43.30610493968783]
  We review state-of-the-art deep learning-based planning systems, and focus on how they integrate prediction. We discuss the implications, strengths, and limitations of different integration principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-10T17:53:03Z)
• Can Fairness be Automated? Guidelines and Opportunities for Fairness-aware AutoML [52.86328317233883]
  We present a comprehensive overview of different ways in which fairness-related harm can arise. We highlight several open technical challenges for future work in this direction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T09:40:08Z)
• Learning energy-efficient driving behaviors by imitating experts [75.12960180185105]
  This paper examines the role of imitation learning in bridging the gap between control strategies and realistic limitations in communication and sensing. We show that imitation learning can succeed in deriving policies that, if adopted by 5% of vehicles, may boost the energy-efficiency of networks with varying traffic conditions by 15% using only local observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T17:08:31Z)
• Audiovisual Affect Assessment and Autonomous Automobiles: Applications [0.0]
  This contribution aims to foresee according challenges and provide potential avenues towards affect modelling in a multimodal "audiovisual plus x" on the road context. From the technical end, this concerns holistic passenger modelling and reliable diarisation of the individuals in a vehicle. In conclusion, automated affect analysis has just matured to the point of applicability in autonomous vehicles in first selected use-cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T20:39:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.