Optimizing Digital Adjudication through Social Network Analysis: An Empirical Study of Credit Card Disputes in Beijing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05299v1
• Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2026 11:21:39 GMT
• Title: Optimizing Digital Adjudication through Social Network Analysis: An Empirical Study of Credit Card Disputes in Beijing
• Authors: Chung Han Tsai, ChengTo Lin, Chung Han Tsai, ChengTo Lin, Baowen Zhang, Qingyue Deng, Yunhui Zhao, Zhijia Song, Baowen Zhang, Qingyue Deng, Yunhui Zhao, Zhijia Song,
• Abstract summary: This study uses social network analysis to examine credit card disputes involving personal information protection adjudicated in Beijing.<n>The findings demonstrate that SNA can effectively identify core legal norms and typify cases, offering a robust methodological framework for optimizing 'Digital Court' systems.
• Score: 4.99372260377507
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Amid the rapid digitalization of judicial systems, the integration of big data into adjudication remains underexplored, particularly in uncovering the structural logic of legal applications. This study bridges this gap by employing social network analysis (SNA) to examine credit card disputes involving personal information protection adjudicated in Beijing. By constructing a legal citation network, we reveal the latent patterns of substantive and procedural law application. The findings demonstrate that SNA can effectively identify core legal norms and typify cases, offering a robust methodological framework for optimizing 'Digital Court' systems. These insights provide practical pathways for enhancing judicial efficiency and consistency through data-driven case retrieval and holistic judicial information networks.

Related papers

• LegalOne: A Family of Foundation Models for Reliable Legal Reasoning [54.57434222018289]
  We present LegalOne, a family of foundational models specifically tailored for the Chinese legal domain.<n>LegalOne is developed through a comprehensive three-phase pipeline designed to master legal reasoning.<n>We publicly release the LegalOne weights and the LegalKit evaluation framework to advance the field of Legal AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T10:18:32Z)
• AI-Powered Legal Intelligence System Architecture: A Comprehensive Framework for Automated Legal Consultation and Analysis [0.0]
  The LICES architecture can reduce preliminary legal research and case assessment time by more than 90% compared to traditional paralegal benchmarks.<n>Performance evaluations indicate that the LICES architecture can reduce preliminary legal research and case assessment time by more than 98%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T19:41:26Z)
• ClaimGen-CN: A Large-scale Chinese Dataset for Legal Claim Generation [56.79698529022327]
  Legal claims refer to the plaintiff's demands in a case and are essential to guiding judicial reasoning and case resolution.<n>This paper explores the problem of legal claim generation based on the given case's facts.<n>We construct ClaimGen-CN, the first dataset for Chinese legal claim generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T07:19:25Z)
• GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Prediction [60.13483016810707]
  Legal judgment prediction (LJP) has become increasingly important in the legal field.<n>Existing large language models (LLMs) have significant problems of insufficient reasoning due to a lack of legal knowledge.<n>We introduce GLARE, an agentic legal reasoning framework that dynamically acquires key legal knowledge by invoking different modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T13:38:12Z)
• Cloud Digital Forensic Readiness: An Open Source Approach to Law Enforcement Request Management [0.4972323953932129]
  Cloud Forensics presents a multi-jurisdictional challenge that may undermines the success of digital forensic investigations.<n>The growing volumes of domiciled and foreign law enforcement (LE) requests, the latency and complexity of formal channels for crossborder data access are challenging issues.<n>We propose an abstract architecture for a Cloud Law Enforcement Requests Management System (CLERMS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-05T22:06:42Z)
• Incorporating Legal Structure in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Case Study on Copyright Fair Use [44.99833362998488]
  This paper presents a domain-specific implementation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation tailored to the Fair Use Doctrine in U.S. copyright law.<n>Motivated by the increasing prevalence of DMCA takedowns and the lack of accessible legal support for content creators, we propose a structured approach that combines semantic search with legal knowledge graphs and court citation networks to improve retrieval quality and reasoning reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-04T15:53:49Z)
• A Law Reasoning Benchmark for LLM with Tree-Organized Structures including Factum Probandum, Evidence and Experiences [76.73731245899454]
  We propose a transparent law reasoning schema enriched with hierarchical factum probandum, evidence, and implicit experience.<n>Inspired by this schema, we introduce the challenging task, which takes a textual case description and outputs a hierarchical structure justifying the final decision.<n>This benchmark paves the way for transparent and accountable AI-assisted law reasoning in the Intelligent Court''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T10:26:54Z)
• Hybrid Deep Learning for Legal Text Analysis: Predicting Punishment Durations in Indonesian Court Rulings [0.0]
  This study develops a deep learning-based predictive system for court sentence lengths. Our model, combining CNN and BiLSTM with attention mechanism, achieved an R-squared score of 0.5893.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T07:07:48Z)
• DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignment [55.91429725404988]
  We introduce DELTA, a discriminative model designed for legal case retrieval. We leverage shallow decoders to create information bottlenecks, aiming to enhance the representation ability. Our approach can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in legal case retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T10:40:14Z)
• INACIA: Integrating Large Language Models in Brazilian Audit Courts: Opportunities and Challenges [7.366861473623427]
  INACIA is a groundbreaking system designed to integrate Large Language Models (LLMs) into the operational framework of Brazilian Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) We demonstrate INACIA's potential in extracting relevant information from case documents, evaluating its legal plausibility, and formulating propositions for judicial decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T17:13:28Z)
• SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
  Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system. Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures. We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.