Forgetting Similar Samples: Can Machine Unlearning Do it Better?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06938v1
• Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 14:55:57 GMT
• Title: Forgetting Similar Samples: Can Machine Unlearning Do it Better?
• Authors: Heng Xu, Tianqing Zhu, Dayong Ye, Lefeng Zhang, Le Wang, Wanlei Zhou,
• Abstract summary: We argue that machine unlearning methods mainly aim at removing samples rather than removing samples' influence on the model.<n>We conduct a study to evaluate the effectiveness of existing unlearning schemes when the training dataset includes many samples similar to those targeted for unlearning.<n>Our experiments, conducted on four carefully constructed datasets with thorough analysis, reveal a notable gap between the expected and actual performance of most existing unlearning methods.
• Score: 35.26900233614191
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine unlearning, a process enabling pre-trained models to remove the influence of specific training samples, has attracted significant attention in recent years. Although extensive research has focused on developing efficient machine unlearning strategies, we argue that these methods mainly aim at removing samples rather than removing samples' influence on the model, thus overlooking the fundamental definition of machine unlearning. In this paper, we first conduct a comprehensive study to evaluate the effectiveness of existing unlearning schemes when the training dataset includes many samples similar to those targeted for unlearning. Specifically, we evaluate: Do existing unlearning methods truly adhere to the original definition of machine unlearning and effectively eliminate all influence of target samples when similar samples are present in the training dataset? Our extensive experiments, conducted on four carefully constructed datasets with thorough analysis, reveal a notable gap between the expected and actual performance of most existing unlearning methods for image and language models, even for the retraining-from-scratch baseline. Additionally, we also explore potential solutions to enhance current unlearning approaches.

Related papers

• Efficient Machine Unlearning via Influence Approximation [75.31015485113993]
  Influence-based unlearning has emerged as a prominent approach to estimate the impact of individual training samples on model parameters without retraining.<n>This paper establishes a theoretical link between memorizing (incremental learning) and forgetting (unlearning)<n>We introduce the Influence Approximation Unlearning algorithm for efficient machine unlearning from the incremental perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T05:34:27Z)
• Zero-Shot Machine Unlearning with Proxy Adversarial Data Generation [23.668928015009087]
  Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of specific samples from a trained model.<n>Existing unlearning algorithms depend on the remaining data to prevent this issue.<n>This paper presents a novel framework, ZS-PAG, to fill this gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T12:16:55Z)
• Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching [65.13151619119782]
  Machine unlearning -- efficiently removing a small "forget set" training data on a pre-divertrained machine learning model -- has recently attracted interest. Recent research shows that machine unlearning techniques do not hold up in such a challenging setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:20:10Z)
• Evaluating of Machine Unlearning: Robustness Verification Without Prior Modifications [15.257558809246524]
  Unlearning is a process enabling pre-trained models to remove the influence of specific training samples. Existing verification methods rely on machine learning attack techniques, such as membership inference attacks (MIAs) or backdoor attacks. We propose a novel verification scheme without any prior modifications, and can support verification on a much larger set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T03:19:14Z)
• Instance-Level Difficulty: A Missing Perspective in Machine Unlearning [13.052520843129363]
  We study the cruxes that make machine unlearning difficult through a thorough instance-level unlearning performance analysis.<n>In particular, we summarize four factors that make unlearning a data point difficult.<n>We argue that machine unlearning research should pay attention to the instance-level difficulty of unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T23:41:42Z)
• Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methods [97.2995389188179]
  This paper seeks to refine the evaluation of machine unlearning for large language models.<n>It addresses two key challenges -- the robustness of evaluation metrics and the trade-offs between competing goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Machine Unlearning in Contrastive Learning [3.6218162133579694]
  We introduce a novel gradient constraint-based approach for training the model to effectively achieve machine unlearning. Our approach demonstrates proficient performance not only on contrastive learning models but also on supervised learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T16:09:01Z)
• Distilled Datamodel with Reverse Gradient Matching [74.75248610868685]
  We introduce an efficient framework for assessing data impact, comprising offline training and online evaluation stages. Our proposed method achieves comparable model behavior evaluation while significantly speeding up the process compared to the direct retraining method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T09:16:14Z)
• Contrastive Unlearning: A Contrastive Approach to Machine Unlearning [30.38966646250252]
  We propose a contrastive unlearning framework, leveraging the concept of representation learning for more effective unlearning. We show that contrastive unlearning achieves the best unlearning effects and efficiency with the lowest performance loss compared with the state-of-the-art algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T02:16:30Z)
• Machine Unlearning for Causal Inference [0.6621714555125157]
  It is important to enable the model to forget some of its learning/captured information about a given user (machine unlearning) This paper introduces the concept of machine unlearning for causal inference, particularly propensity score matching and treatment effect estimation. The dataset used in the study is the Lalonde dataset, a widely used dataset for evaluating the effectiveness of job training programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T17:27:01Z)
• Generalization Properties of Retrieval-based Models [50.35325326050263]
  Retrieval-based machine learning methods have enjoyed success on a wide range of problems. Despite growing literature showcasing the promise of these models, the theoretical underpinning for such models remains underexplored. We present a formal treatment of retrieval-based models to characterize their generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T00:33:01Z)
• Few-Cost Salient Object Detection with Adversarial-Paced Learning [95.0220555274653]
  This paper proposes to learn the effective salient object detection model based on the manual annotation on a few training images only. We name this task as the few-cost salient object detection and propose an adversarial-paced learning (APL)-based framework to facilitate the few-cost learning scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-05T14:15:49Z)
• Automatic Recall Machines: Internal Replay, Continual Learning and the Brain [104.38824285741248]
  Replay in neural networks involves training on sequential data with memorized samples, which counteracts forgetting of previous behavior caused by non-stationarity. We present a method where these auxiliary samples are generated on the fly, given only the model that is being trained for the assessed objective. Instead the implicit memory of learned samples within the assessed model itself is exploited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T15:07:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.