Frame-Guided Synthetic Claim Generation for Automatic Fact-Checking Using High-Volume Tabular Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17232v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 23:47:41 GMT
• Title: Frame-Guided Synthetic Claim Generation for Automatic Fact-Checking Using High-Volume Tabular Data
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new large-scale, multilingual dataset to address this critical gap.<n>It contains 78,503 synthetic claims grounded in complex OECD tables which average over 500K rows each.<n>We demonstrate through knowledgeprobing experiments that LLMs have not memorized these facts.
• Score: 6.26620319525128
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Automated fact-checking benchmarks have largely ignored the challenge of verifying claims against real-world, high-volume structured data, instead focusing on small, curated tables. We introduce a new large-scale, multilingual dataset to address this critical gap. It contains 78,503 synthetic claims grounded in 434 complex OECD tables, which average over 500K rows each. We propose a novel, frame-guided methodology where algorithms programmatically select significant data points based on six semantic frames to generate realistic claims in English, Chinese, Spanish, and Hindi. Crucially, we demonstrate through knowledge-probing experiments that LLMs have not memorized these facts, forcing systems to perform genuine retrieval and reasoning rather than relying on parameterized knowledge. We provide a baseline SQL-generation system and show that our benchmark is highly challenging. Our analysis identifies evidence retrieval as the primary bottleneck, with models struggling to find the correct data in massive tables. This dataset provides a critical new resource for advancing research on this unsolved, real-world problem.

Related papers

• Who Gets Cited Most? Benchmarking Long-Context Language Models on Scientific Articles [81.89404347890662]
  SciTrek is a novel question-answering benchmark designed to evaluate the long-context reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) using scientific articles.<n>Our analysis reveals systematic shortcomings in models' abilities to perform basic numerical operations and accurately locate specific information in long contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T11:36:09Z)
• Agentic LLMs for Question Answering over Tabular Data [6.310433217813068]
  Question Answering over Tabular Data (Table QA) presents unique challenges due to the diverse structure, size, and data types of real-world tables.<n>This paper details our methodology, experimental results, and alternative approaches, providing insights into the strengths and limitations of Table QA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T08:12:38Z)
• LLM-Symbolic Integration for Robust Temporal Tabular Reasoning [69.27153114778748]
  We introduce TempTabQA-C, a synthetic dataset designed for systematic and controlled evaluations.<n>This structured approach allows Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate and executesql queries, enhancing generalization and mitigating biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T05:14:04Z)
• RAISE: Reasoning Agent for Interactive SQL Exploration [47.77323087050061]
  We propose a novel framework that unifies schema linking, query generation, and iterative refinement within a single, end-to-end component.<n>Our method emulates how humans answer questions when working with unfamiliar databases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T03:07:08Z)
• Learning from Imperfect Data: Towards Efficient Knowledge Distillation of Autoregressive Language Models for Text-to-SQL [83.99974309930072]
  Knowledge distillation (KD) is a common approach, which aims to distill the larger teacher model into a smaller student model. We propose to improve the KD with Imperfect Data, namely KID, which effectively boosts the performance without introducing much training budget. KID can not only achieve consistent and significant performance gains across all model types and sizes, but also effectively improve the training efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T07:51:00Z)
• TableRAG: Million-Token Table Understanding with Language Models [53.039560091592215]
  TableRAG is a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework specifically designed for LM-based table understanding.<n>TableRAG leverages query expansion combined with schema and cell retrieval to pinpoint crucial information before providing it to the LMs.<n>Our results demonstrate that TableRAG achieves the highest retrieval quality, leading to the new state-of-the-art performance on large-scale table understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T04:15:02Z)
• DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models [50.36636396660163]
  We present DiscoveryBench, the first comprehensive benchmark that formalizes the multi-step process of data-driven discovery. Our benchmark contains 264 tasks collected across 6 diverse domains, such as sociology and engineering. Our benchmark, thus, illustrates the challenges in autonomous data-driven discovery and serves as a valuable resource for the community to make progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T18:58:22Z)
• DCA-Bench: A Benchmark for Dataset Curation Agents [9.60250892491588]
  Data quality issues, such as incomplete documentation, inaccurate labels, ethical concerns, and outdated information, remain common in widely used datasets.<n>With the surging ability of large language models (LLM), it's promising to streamline the discovery of hidden dataset issues with LLM agents.<n>In this work, we establish a benchmark to measure LLM agent's ability to tackle this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T14:02:23Z)
• Uncovering Limitations of Large Language Models in Information Seeking from Tables [28.19697259795014]
  This paper introduces a more reliable benchmark for Table Information Seeking (TabIS) To avoid the unreliable evaluation caused by text similarity-based metrics, TabIS adopts a single-choice question format (with two options per question) instead of a text generation format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T14:30:59Z)
• Automating Dataset Updates Towards Reliable and Timely Evaluation of Large Language Models [81.27391252152199]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various natural language benchmarks. We propose to automate dataset updating and provide systematic analysis regarding its effectiveness. There are two updating strategies: 1) mimicking strategy to generate similar samples based on original data, and 2) extending strategy that further expands existing samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T07:15:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.