NCSAM Noise-Compensated Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Noisy Label Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19947v1
• Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 11:10:29 GMT
• Title: NCSAM Noise-Compensated Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Noisy Label Learning
• Authors: Jiayu Xu, Junbiao Pang,
• Abstract summary: This paper establishes a theoretical analysis of the relationship between flatness of the loss landscape and the presence of label noise.<n>We propose Noise-Compensated Sharpness-aware Minimization (NCSAM) to leverage the perturbation of Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) to remedy the damage of label noises.
• Score: 5.810900591128541
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Learning from Noisy Labels (LNL) presents a fundamental challenge in deep learning, as real-world datasets often contain erroneous or corrupted annotations, \textit{e.g.}, data crawled from Web. Current research focuses on sophisticated label correction mechanisms. In contrast, this paper adopts a novel perspective by establishing a theoretical analysis the relationship between flatness of the loss landscape and the presence of label noise. In this paper, we theoretically demonstrate that carefully simulated label noise synergistically enhances both the generalization performance and robustness of label noises. Consequently, we propose Noise-Compensated Sharpness-aware Minimization (NCSAM) to leverage the perturbation of Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) to remedy the damage of label noises. Our analysis reveals that the testing accuracy exhibits a similar behavior that has been observed on the noise-clear dataset. Extensive experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate the consistent superiority of the proposed method over existing state-of-the-art approaches on diverse tasks.

Related papers

• Combating Noisy Labels through Fostering Self- and Neighbor-Consistency [120.4394402099635]
  Label noise is pervasive in various real-world scenarios, posing challenges in supervised deep learning.<n>We propose a noise-robust method named Jo-SNC (textbfJoint sample selection and model regularization based on textbfSelf- and textbfNeighbor-textbfConsistency)<n>We design a self-adaptive, data-driven thresholding scheme to adjust per-class selection thresholds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T07:55:29Z)
• FNBench: Benchmarking Robust Federated Learning against Noisy Labels [23.660857480962104]
  This paper presents the first benchmark study on noisy labels in federated learning (FL)<n>We consider three diverse label noise patterns covering synthetic label noise, imperfect human-annotation errors and systematic errors.<n>Our evaluation incorporates eighteen state-of-the-art methods over five image recognition datasets and one text classification dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-10T16:14:52Z)
• NoiseBench: Benchmarking the Impact of Real Label Noise on Named Entity Recognition [3.726602636064681]
  We present an analysis that shows that real noise is significantly more challenging than simulated noise. We show that current state-of-the-art models for noise-robust learning fall far short of their theoretically achievable upper bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T10:20:31Z)
• Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selection [82.43311784594384]
  Real-world datasets contain not only noisy labels but also class imbalance. We propose a simple yet effective method to address noisy labels in imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T10:34:53Z)
• Robust Tiny Object Detection in Aerial Images amidst Label Noise [50.257696872021164]
  This study addresses the issue of tiny object detection under noisy label supervision. We propose a DeNoising Tiny Object Detector (DN-TOD), which incorporates a Class-aware Label Correction scheme. Our method can be seamlessly integrated into both one-stage and two-stage object detection pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T02:14:33Z)
• Analyze the Robustness of Classifiers under Label Noise [5.708964539699851]
  Label noise in supervised learning, characterized by erroneous or imprecise labels, significantly impairs model performance. This research focuses on the increasingly pertinent issue of label noise's impact on practical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T13:51:25Z)
• Neighborhood Collective Estimation for Noisy Label Identification and Correction [92.20697827784426]
  Learning with noisy labels (LNL) aims at designing strategies to improve model performance and generalization by mitigating the effects of model overfitting to noisy labels. Recent advances employ the predicted label distributions of individual samples to perform noise verification and noisy label correction, easily giving rise to confirmation bias. We propose Neighborhood Collective Estimation, in which the predictive reliability of a candidate sample is re-estimated by contrasting it against its feature-space nearest neighbors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-05T14:47:22Z)
• S3: Supervised Self-supervised Learning under Label Noise [53.02249460567745]
  In this paper we address the problem of classification in the presence of label noise. In the heart of our method is a sample selection mechanism that relies on the consistency between the annotated label of a sample and the distribution of the labels in its neighborhood in the feature space. Our method significantly surpasses previous methods on both CIFARCIFAR100 with artificial noise and real-world noisy datasets such as WebVision and ANIMAL-10N.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T15:49:20Z)
• Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotations [54.400167806154535]
  Existing research on learning with noisy labels mainly focuses on synthetic label noise. This work presents two new benchmark datasets (CIFAR-10N, CIFAR-100N) We show that real-world noisy labels follow an instance-dependent pattern rather than the classically adopted class-dependent ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T22:42:11Z)
• Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noise [27.885927200376386]
  We show that open-set noisy labels can be non-toxic and even benefit the robustness against inherent noisy labels. We propose a simple yet effective regularization by introducing Open-set samples with Dynamic Noisy Labels (ODNL) into training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T07:15:50Z)
• Analysing the Noise Model Error for Realistic Noisy Label Data [14.766574408868806]
  We study the quality of estimated noise models from the theoretical side by deriving the expected error of the noise model. We also publish NoisyNER, a new noisy label dataset from the NLP domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T17:45:15Z)
• Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noise via a Universal Probabilistic Model [80.91927573604438]
  This paper proposes a simple yet universal probabilistic model, which explicitly relates noisy labels to their instances. Experiments on datasets with both synthetic and real-world label noise verify that the proposed method yields significant improvements on robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-14T05:43:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.