Amortised and provably-robust simulation-based inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11325v2
• Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 08:36:36 GMT
• Title: Amortised and provably-robust simulation-based inference
• Authors: Ayush Bharti, Charita Dellaporta, Yuga Hikida, François-Xavier Briol,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel approach to simulation-based inference grounded in generalised Bayesian inference.<n>We demonstrate that inference can be further simplified and performed without the need for Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling.
• Score: 8.066034633422252
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Complex simulator-based models are now routinely used to perform inference across the sciences and engineering, but existing inference methods are often unable to account for outliers and other extreme values in data which occur due to faulty measurement instruments or human error. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to simulation-based inference grounded in generalised Bayesian inference and a neural approximation of a weighted score-matching loss. This leads to a method that is both amortised and provably robust to outliers, a combination not achieved by existing approaches. Furthermore, through a carefully chosen conditional density model, we demonstrate that inference can be further simplified and performed without the need for Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling, thereby offering significant computational advantages, with complexity that is only a small fraction of that of current state-of-the-art approaches.

Related papers

• MIBP-Cert: Certified Training against Data Perturbations with Mixed-Integer Bilinear Programs [50.41998220099097]
  Data errors, corruptions, and poisoning attacks during training pose a major threat to the reliability of modern AI systems.<n>We introduce MIBP-Cert, a novel certification method based on mixed-integer bilinear programming (MIBP)<n>By computing the set of parameters reachable through perturbed or manipulated data, we can predict all possible outcomes and guarantee robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T14:56:39Z)
• A Metalearned Neural Circuit for Nonparametric Bayesian Inference [4.767884267554628]
  Most applications of machine learning to classification assume a closed set of balanced classes. This is at odds with the real world, where class occurrence statistics often follow a long-tailed power-law distribution. We present a method for extracting the inductive bias from a nonparametric Bayesian model and transferring it to an artificial neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T16:43:17Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Convergence of uncertainty estimates in Ensemble and Bayesian sparse model discovery [4.446017969073817]
  We show empirical success in terms of accuracy and robustness to noise with bootstrapping-based sequential thresholding least-squares estimator. We show that this bootstrapping-based ensembling technique can perform a provably correct variable selection procedure with an exponential convergence rate of the error rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T04:07:59Z)
• Maximum Likelihood Learning of Unnormalized Models for Simulation-Based Inference [44.281860162298564]
  We introduce two synthetic likelihood methods for Simulation-Based Inference. We learn a conditional energy-based model (EBM) of the likelihood using synthetic data generated by the simulator. We demonstrate the properties of both methods on a range of synthetic datasets, and apply them to a model of the neuroscience network in the crab.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T14:38:24Z)
• MINIMALIST: Mutual INformatIon Maximization for Amortized Likelihood Inference from Sampled Trajectories [61.3299263929289]
  Simulation-based inference enables learning the parameters of a model even when its likelihood cannot be computed in practice. One class of methods uses data simulated with different parameters to infer an amortized estimator for the likelihood-to-evidence ratio. We show that this approach can be formulated in terms of mutual information between model parameters and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T12:59:16Z)
• Simulation-Assisted Decorrelation for Resonant Anomaly Detection [1.5675763601034223]
  A growing number of weak- and unsupervised machine learning approaches to anomaly detection are being proposed. One of the examples is the search for resonant new physics, where a bump hunt can be performed in an invariant mass spectrum. We explore two solutions to this challenge by incorporating minimally prototypical simulation into the learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-04T14:02:15Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• Detangling robustness in high dimensions: composite versus model-averaged estimation [11.658462692891355]
  Robust methods, though ubiquitous in practice, are yet to be fully understood in the context of regularized estimation and high dimensions. This paper provides a toolbox to further study robustness in these settings and focuses on prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T20:40:15Z)
• Efficient Ensemble Model Generation for Uncertainty Estimation with Bayesian Approximation in Segmentation [74.06904875527556]
  We propose a generic and efficient segmentation framework to construct ensemble segmentation models. In the proposed method, ensemble models can be efficiently generated by using the layer selection method. We also devise a new pixel-wise uncertainty loss, which improves the predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T16:08:38Z)
• Amortized Bayesian model comparison with evidential deep learning [0.12314765641075436]
  We propose a novel method for performing Bayesian model comparison using specialized deep learning architectures. Our method is purely simulation-based and circumvents the step of explicitly fitting all alternative models under consideration to each observed dataset. We show that our method achieves excellent results in terms of accuracy, calibration, and efficiency across the examples considered in this work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T15:15:46Z)
• Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimators [77.34726150561087]
  Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE) When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.