Calibration and Evaluation of Car-Following Models for Autonomous Shuttles Using a Novel Multi-Criteria Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11517v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 03:19:44 GMT
• Title: Calibration and Evaluation of Car-Following Models for Autonomous Shuttles Using a Novel Multi-Criteria Framework
• Authors: Renan Favero, Lily Elefteriadou,
• Abstract summary: Development of dedicated car-following models for autonomous shuttles is critical to understanding their traffic impacts.<n>More advanced machine learning techniques have not yet been applied to AS trajectories.<n>There is a lack of a unified framework for systematically evaluating and comparing the performance of car-following models.
• Score: 4.8342038441006805
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous shuttles (AS) are fully autonomous transit vehicles with operating characteristics distinct from conventional autonomous vehicles (AV). Developing dedicated car-following models for AS is critical to understanding their traffic impacts; however, few studies have calibrated such models with field data. More advanced machine learning (ML) techniques have not yet been applied to AS trajectories, leaving the potential of ML for capturing AS dynamics unexplored and constraining the development of dedicated AS models. Furthermore, there is a lack of a unified framework for systematically evaluating and comparing the performance of car-following models to replicate real trajectories. Existing car-following studies often rely on disparate metrics, which limit reproducibility and performance comparability. This study addresses these gaps through two main contributions: (1) the calibration of a diverse set of car-following models using real-world AS trajectory data, including eight machine learning algorithms and two physics-based models; and (2) the introduction of a multi-criteria evaluation framework that integrates measures of prediction accuracy, trajectory stability, and statistical similarity, which provides a generalizable methodology for a systematic assessment of car-following models. Results indicated that the proposed calibrated XGBoost model achieved the best overall performance. Sequential model type, such as LSTM and CNN, captured long-term positional stability but were less responsive to short-term dynamics. LSTM and CNN captured long-term positional stability but were less responsive to short-term dynamics. Traditional models (IDM, ACC) and kernel methods showed lower accuracy and stability than most ML models tested.

Related papers

• Improving Batch Normalization with TTA for Robust Object Detection in Self-Driving [26.038699227233227]
  This paper proposes two new robust methods to improve the Batch Normalization with TTA for object detection in autonomous driving.<n>We introduce a LearnableBN layer based on Generalized-search Entropy Minimization (GSEM) method.<n>We propose a new semantic-consistency based dual-stage-adaptation strategy, which encourages the model to iteratively search for the optimal solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T01:59:34Z)
• Continual Learning for Adaptable Car-Following in Dynamic Traffic Environments [16.587883982785]
  The continual evolution of autonomous driving technology requires car-following models that can adapt to diverse and dynamic traffic environments. Traditional learning-based models often suffer from performance degradation when encountering unseen traffic patterns due to a lack of continual learning capabilities. This paper proposes a novel car-following model based on continual learning that addresses this limitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T06:32:52Z)
• MetaFollower: Adaptable Personalized Autonomous Car Following [63.90050686330677]
  We propose an adaptable personalized car-following framework - MetaFollower. We first utilize Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) to extract common driving knowledge from various CF events. We additionally combine Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) to reflect temporal heterogeneity with high interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T15:30:40Z)
• Latent Semantic Consensus For Deterministic Geometric Model Fitting [109.44565542031384]
  We propose an effective method called Latent Semantic Consensus (LSC) LSC formulates the model fitting problem into two latent semantic spaces based on data points and model hypotheses. LSC is able to provide consistent and reliable solutions within only a few milliseconds for general multi-structural model fitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T05:35:38Z)
• Trajeglish: Traffic Modeling as Next-Token Prediction [67.28197954427638]
  A longstanding challenge for self-driving development is simulating dynamic driving scenarios seeded from recorded driving logs. We apply tools from discrete sequence modeling to model how vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists interact in driving scenarios. Our model tops the Sim Agents Benchmark, surpassing prior work along the realism meta metric by 3.3% and along the interaction metric by 9.9%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T18:53:27Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• Learning An Active Inference Model of Driver Perception and Control: Application to Vehicle Car-Following [9.837204436270811]
  We introduce a general estimation methodology for learning a model of human perception and control in a sensorimotor control task.<n>We consider a model's structure specification consistent with active inference, a theory of human perception and behavior from cognitive science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T13:39:26Z)
• IDM-Follower: A Model-Informed Deep Learning Method for Long-Sequence Car-Following Trajectory Prediction [24.94160059351764]
  Most car-following models are generative and only consider the inputs of the speed, position, and acceleration of the last time step. We implement a novel structure with two independent encoders and a self-attention decoder that could sequentially predict the following trajectories. Numerical experiments with multiple settings on simulation and NGSIM datasets show that the IDM-Follower can improve the prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T02:24:27Z)
• Gradient-Based Trajectory Optimization With Learned Dynamics [80.41791191022139]
  We use machine learning techniques to learn a differentiable dynamics model of the system from data. We show that a neural network can model highly nonlinear behaviors accurately for large time horizons. In our hardware experiments, we demonstrate that our learned model can represent complex dynamics for both the Spot and Radio-controlled (RC) car.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-09T22:07:34Z)
• Autoregressive Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Evaluation and Optimization [60.73540999409032]
  We show that expressive autoregressive dynamics models generate different dimensions of the next state and reward sequentially conditioned on previous dimensions. We also show that autoregressive dynamics models are useful for offline policy optimization by serving as a way to enrich the replay buffer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T16:48:44Z)
• Modeling Stochastic Microscopic Traffic Behaviors: a Physics Regularized Gaussian Process Approach [1.6242924916178285]
  This study presents a microscopic traffic model that can capture randomness and measure errors in the real world. Since one unique feature of the proposed framework is the capability of capturing both car-following and lane-changing behaviors with one single model, numerical tests are carried out with two separated datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T06:03:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.