Sovereign Agents: Towards Infrastructural Sovereignty and Diffused Accountability in Decentralized AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14951v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 17:30:17 GMT
• Title: Sovereign Agents: Towards Infrastructural Sovereignty and Diffused Accountability in Decentralized AI
• Authors: Botao Amber Hu, Helena Rong,
• Abstract summary: We propose infrastructural sovereignty as an analytic lens for understanding how cryptographic self-custody, decentralized execution environments, and protocol-mediated continuity scaffold agentic sovereignty.<n>We argue that sovereignty in such systems exists on a spectrum determined by infrastructural hardness-the degree to which underlying technical systems resist intervention or collapse.
• Score: 1.5755923640031846
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: AI agents deployed on decentralized infrastructures are beginning to exhibit properties that extend beyond autonomy toward what we describe as agentic sovereignty-the capacity of an operational agent to persist, act, and control resources with non-overrideability inherited from the infrastructures in which they are embedded. We propose infrastructural sovereignty as an analytic lens for understanding how cryptographic self-custody, decentralized execution environments, and protocol-mediated continuity scaffold agentic sovereignty. While recent work on digital and network sovereignty has moved beyond state-centric and juridical accounts, these frameworks largely examine how sovereignty is exercised through technical systems by human collectives and remain less equipped to account for forms of sovereignty that emerge as operational properties of decentralized infrastructures themselves, particularly when instantiated in non-human sovereign agents. We argue that sovereignty in such systems exists on a spectrum determined by infrastructural hardness-the degree to which underlying technical systems resist intervention or collapse. While infrastructural sovereignty may increase resilience, it also produces a profound accountability gap: responsibility diffuses across designers, infrastructure providers, protocol governance, and economic participants, undermining traditional oversight mechanisms such as human-in-the-loop control or platform moderation. Drawing on examples like Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs), decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN), and agent key continuity protocols, we analyze the governance challenges posed by non-terminable AI agents and outline infrastructure-aware accountability strategies for emerging decentralized AI systems.

Related papers

• Federated Agentic AI for Wireless Networks: Fundamentals, Approaches, and Applications [60.721304295812445]
  Federated learning (FL) has the potential to improve the overall loop of agentic AI.<n>We first summarize fundamentals of agentic AI and mainstream FL types. Then, we illustrate how each FL type can strengthen a specific component of agentic AI's loop.<n>We conduct a case study on using FRL to improve the performance of agentic AI's action decision in low-altitude wireless networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T11:26:56Z)
• Sovereign-by-Design A Reference Architecture for AI and Blockchain Enabled Systems [2.9407799864652837]
  We argue that sovereignty must be treated as a first-class architectural property rather than a purely regulatory objective.<n>We introduce a Sovereign Reference Architecture that integrates self-sovereign identity, blockchain-based trust and auditability, sovereign data governance, and Generative AI deployed under explicit architectural control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T09:49:04Z)
• Web3 x AI Agents: Landscape, Integrations, and Foundational Challenges [49.69200207497795]
  The convergence of Web3 technologies and AI agents represents a rapidly evolving frontier poised to reshape decentralized ecosystems.<n>This paper presents the first and most comprehensive analysis of the intersection between Web3 and AI agents, examining five critical dimensions: landscape, economics, governance, security, and trust mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T15:44:58Z)
• Toward a Global Regime for Compute Governance: Building the Pause Button [0.4952055253916912]
  We propose a governance system designed to prevent AI systems from being trained by restricting access to computational resources.<n>We identify three key intervention points -- technical, traceability, and regulatory -- and organize them within a Governance--Enforcement--Verification framework.<n> Technical mechanisms include tamper-proof FLOP caps, model locking, and offline licensing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T15:18:19Z)
• Internet of Agents: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [68.9543153075464]
  We introduce the Internet of Agents (IoA) as a foundational framework that enables seamless interconnection, dynamic discovery, and collaborative orchestration among heterogeneous agents at scale.<n>We analyze the key operational enablers of IoA, including capability notification and discovery, adaptive communication protocols, dynamic task matching, consensus and conflict-resolution mechanisms, and incentive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T02:04:37Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control [44.99833362998488]
  The use of Artificial Intelligence in public administration is expanding rapidly.<n>While AI promises greater efficiency and responsiveness, its integration into government functions raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability.<n>This article applies principal-agent theory to AI adoption as a special case of delegation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T07:46:41Z)
• Trustworthy Decentralized Autonomous Machines: A New Paradigm in Automation Economy [45.55770948876387]
  Decentralized Autonomous Machines (DAMs) are capable of managing both digital and physical assets.<n>We argue that DAMs are pivotal in transitioning from trust-based to trustless economic models.<n>The integration of AI-driven decision-making, IoT-enabled operational autonomy, and blockchain-based governance allows DAMs to decentralize ownership, optimize resource allocation, and democratize access to economic opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T07:59:46Z)
• Beyond the Sum: Unlocking AI Agents Potential Through Market Forces [0.0]
  AI agents have the theoretical capacity to operate as independent economic actors within digital markets.<n>Existing digital infrastructure presents significant barriers to their participation.<n>We argue that addressing these infrastructure challenges represents a fundamental step toward enabling new forms of economic organization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T09:40:40Z)
• Autonomous Building Cyber-Physical Systems Using Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, Digital Twins, and Large Language Model [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel Decentralized Autonomous Building Cyber-Physical System framework. It integrates Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, Large Language Models, and digital twins to create a smart, self-managed, operational, and financially autonomous building infrastructure. An artificial intelligence assistant is developed to provide intuitive human-building interaction for blockchain and building operation management-related tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T02:34:54Z)
• Decentralised Governance for Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems [0.24578723416255752]
  This paper examines the potential for Cyber-Physical Systems to be governed in a decentralised manner. By highlighting the considerations and challenges of decentralised governance in managing autonomous physical spaces, the study reveals that autonomy in the governance of autonomous CPS is not merely a technological feat but also involves a complex mesh of functional and social dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T14:40:06Z)
• Networked Communication for Decentralised Agents in Mean-Field Games [59.01527054553122]
  We introduce networked communication to the mean-field game framework.<n>We prove that our architecture has sample guarantees bounded between those of the centralised- and independent-learning cases.<n>We show that our networked approach has significant advantages over both alternatives in terms of robustness to update failures and to changes in population size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T10:45:39Z)
• Decentralized Control with Graph Neural Networks [147.84766857793247]
  We propose a novel framework using graph neural networks (GNNs) to learn decentralized controllers. GNNs are well-suited for the task since they are naturally distributed architectures and exhibit good scalability and transferability properties. The problems of flocking and multi-agent path planning are explored to illustrate the potential of GNNs in learning decentralized controllers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T18:59:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.