A User-driven Design Framework for Robotaxi

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19107v1
• Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2026 09:33:18 GMT
• Title: A User-driven Design Framework for Robotaxi
• Abstract summary: We investigate real-world robotaxi use through 18 semi-structured interviews and autoethnographic ride experiences.<n>We found that users were drawn to robotaxis by low cost, social recommendation, and curiosity.<n>They valued a distinctive set of benefits, such as an increased sense of agency, and consistent driving behavioral consistency.
• Score: 12.910122661259718
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Robotaxis are emerging as a promising form of urban mobility, yet research has largely emphasized technical driving performance while leaving open how passengers experience and evaluate rides without a human driver. To address the limitations of prior work that often relies on simulated or hypothetical settings, we investigate real-world robotaxi use through 18 semi-structured interviews and autoethnographic ride experiences. We found that users were drawn to robotaxis by low cost, social recommendation, and curiosity. They valued a distinctive set of benefits, such as an increased sense of agency, and consistent driving behavioral consistency and standardized ride experiences. However, they encountered persistent challenges around limited flexibility, insufficient transparency, management difficulty, robustness concerns in edge cases, and emergency handling concerns. Robotaxi experiences were shaped by privacy, safety, ethics, and trust. Users were often privacy-indifferent yet sensitive to opaque access and leakage risks; safety perceptions were polarized; and ethical considerations surfaced round issues such as accountability, feedback responsibility and absence of human-like social norms. Based on these findings, we propose a user-driven design framework spanning the end-to-end journey, such as pre-ride configuration (hailing), context-aware pickup facilitation (pick-up) in-ride explainability (traveling), and accountable post-ride feedback (drop-off) to guide robotaxi interaction and service design.

Related papers

• The RoboSense Challenge: Sense Anything, Navigate Anywhere, Adapt Across Platforms [244.78980521248445]
  RoboSense 2025 Challenge is designed to advance robustness and adaptability in robot perception across diverse sensing scenarios.<n>It unifies five complementary research tracks spanning language-grounded decision making, socially compliant navigation, sensor configuration generalization, cross-view and cross-modal correspondence, and cross-platform 3D perception.<n>The challenge attracted 143 teams from 85 institutions across 16 countries, reflecting broad community engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T15:16:18Z)
• Driving Accessibility: Shifting the Narrative & Design of Automated Vehicle Systems for Persons With Disabilities Through a Collaborative Scoring System [0.0]
  Underrepresented groups, including individuals with mobility impairments, sensory disabilities, and cognitive conditions, are often overlooked in crucial discussions on system design, implementation, and usability.<n>We aim to shift automated vehicle research and discourse away from this reactive model and toward a proactive and inclusive approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T02:05:25Z)
• Being good (at driving): Characterizing behavioral expectations on automated and human driven vehicles [0.4476047439400351]
  We put forth the concept of Drivership as a framing for the realization of good driving behaviors.<n>Drivership grounds the evaluation of driving behaviors in the alignment between the mutualistic expectations that exist amongst road users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T04:59:20Z)
• Are VLMs Ready for Autonomous Driving? An Empirical Study from the Reliability, Data, and Metric Perspectives [56.528835143531694]
  We introduce DriveBench, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>Our findings reveal that VLMs often generate plausible responses derived from general knowledge or textual cues rather than true visual grounding.<n>We propose refined evaluation metrics that prioritize robust visual grounding and multi-modal understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T18:59:55Z)
• Traffic and Safety Rule Compliance of Humans in Diverse Driving Situations [48.924085579865334]
  Analyzing human data is crucial for developing autonomous systems that replicate safe driving practices. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of human compliance with traffic and safety rules across multiple trajectory prediction datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T09:21:00Z)
• The RoboDrive Challenge: Drive Anytime Anywhere in Any Condition [136.32656319458158]
  The 2024 RoboDrive Challenge was crafted to propel the development of driving perception technologies. This year's challenge consisted of five distinct tracks and attracted 140 registered teams from 93 institutes across 11 countries. The competition culminated in 15 top-performing solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T17:59:57Z)
• Safe Road-Crossing by Autonomous Wheelchairs: a Novel Dataset and its Experimental Evaluation [42.90509901417468]
  We introduce a multi-sensor fusion approach to support road-crossing decisions in a system composed by an autonomous wheelchair and a flying drone. As a proof-of-concept, we provide an experimental evaluation in a laboratory environment, showing the advantages of using multiple sensors. The work has been developed in the context of an European project named REXASI-PRO, which aims to develop trustworthy artificial intelligence for social navigation of people with reduced mobility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T22:19:06Z)
• Driving Towards Inclusion: A Systematic Review of AI-powered Accessibility Enhancements for People with Disability in Autonomous Vehicles [4.080497848091375]
  We review inclusive human-computer interaction (HCI) within autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven cars with partial autonomy.<n>Key technologies discussed include brain-computer interfaces, anthropomorphic interaction, virtual reality, augmented reality, mode adaptation, voice-activated interfaces, haptic feedback, etc.<n>Building on these findings, we propose an end-to-end design framework that addresses accessibility requirements across diverse user demographics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T00:06:08Z)
• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)
• Principles and Guidelines for Evaluating Social Robot Navigation Algorithms [44.51586279645062]
  Social robot navigation is difficult to evaluate because it involves dynamic human agents and their perceptions of the appropriateness of robot behavior. Our contributions include (a) a definition of a socially navigating robot as one that respects the principles of safety, comfort, legibility, politeness, social competency, agent understanding, proactivity, and responsiveness to context, (b) guidelines for the use of metrics, development of scenarios, benchmarks, datasets, and simulators to evaluate social navigation, and (c) a social navigation metrics framework to make it easier to compare results from different simulators, robots and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T07:31:43Z)
• Exploring Contextual Representation and Multi-Modality for End-to-End Autonomous Driving [58.879758550901364]
  Recent perception systems enhance spatial understanding with sensor fusion but often lack full environmental context. We introduce a framework that integrates three cameras to emulate the human field of view, coupled with top-down bird-eye-view semantic data to enhance contextual representation. Our method achieves displacement error by 0.67m in open-loop settings, surpassing current methods by 6.9% on the nuScenes dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T05:56:20Z)
• Sense-Assess-eXplain (SAX): Building Trust in Autonomous Vehicles in Challenging Real-World Driving Scenarios [24.459719212176637]
  We address fundamental technical issues to overcome critical barriers to assurance and regulation for large-scale deployments of autonomous systems. We present how we build robots that can robustly sense and interpret their environment using traditional as well as unconventional sensors. We describe ongoing work in the collection of an unusual, rare, and highly valuable dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-05T09:54:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.