VeRO: An Evaluation Harness for Agents to Optimize Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22480v1
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 23:40:22 GMT
- Title: VeRO: An Evaluation Harness for Agents to Optimize Agents
- Authors: Varun Ursekar, Apaar Shanker, Veronica Chatrath, Yuan, Xue, Sam Denton,
- Abstract summary: We introduce VERO (Versioning, Rewards, and Observations), which provides a reproducible evaluation harness with versioned agent snapshots, budget-controlled evaluation, and structured execution traces.<n>We conduct an empirical study comparing target agents and analyzing which modifications reliably improve target agent performance.
- Score: 5.227525836910522
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: An important emerging application of coding agents is agent optimization: the iterative improvement of a target agent through edit-execute-evaluate cycles. Despite its relevance, the community lacks a systematic understanding of coding agent performance on this task. Agent optimization differs fundamentally from conventional software engineering: the target agent interleaves deterministic code with stochastic LLM completions, requiring structured capture of both intermediate reasoning and downstream execution outcomes. To address these challenges, we introduce VERO (Versioning, Rewards, and Observations), which provides (1) a reproducible evaluation harness with versioned agent snapshots, budget-controlled evaluation, and structured execution traces, and (2) a benchmark suite of target agents and tasks with reference evaluation procedures. Using VERO, we conduct an empirical study comparing optimizer configurations across tasks and analyzing which modifications reliably improve target agent performance. We release VERO to support research on agent optimization as a core capability for coding agents.
Related papers
- AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progress [71.02263260394261]
Large language models (LLMs) still encounter challenges in multi-turn decision-making tasks.<n>We build process reward models (PRMs) to evaluate each decision and guide the agent's decision-making process.<n>AgentPRM captures both the interdependence between sequential decisions and their contribution to the final goal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-11T14:57:54Z) - Alita-G: Self-Evolving Generative Agent for Agent Generation [54.49365835457433]
We present ALITA-G, a framework that transforms a general-purpose agent into a domain expert.<n>In this framework, a generalist agent executes a curated suite of target-domain tasks.<n>It attains strong gains while reducing computation costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-27T17:59:14Z) - AgentCompass: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Agentic Workflows in Production [4.031479494871582]
We present Agent, the first evaluation framework designed specifically for post-deployment monitoring and reasoning of agentic pipeline.<n>Agent achieves state-of-the-art results on key metrics, while uncovering critical issues missed in human annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-18T05:59:04Z) - AgentSwift: Efficient LLM Agent Design via Value-guided Hierarchical Search [58.98450205734779]
Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities across diverse domains.<n>Existing agent search methods suffer from three major limitations.<n>We introduce a comprehensive framework to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T12:07:23Z) - Agentic Predictor: Performance Prediction for Agentic Workflows via Multi-View Encoding [56.565200973244146]
Agentic Predictor is a lightweight predictor for efficient agentic workflow evaluation.<n>By learning to approximate task success rates, Agentic Predictor enables fast and accurate selection of optimal agentic workflow configurations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T09:46:50Z) - Towards Adaptive Software Agents for Debugging [0.40964539027092917]
We propose an adaptive agentic design, where the number of agents and their roles are determined dynamically.<n>Our initial evaluation shows that, with the adaptive design, the number of agents that are generated depends on the complexity of the buggy code.<n> Regarding the effectiveness of the fix, we noticed an average improvement of 11% compared to the one-shot prompting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-25T12:48:08Z) - On the Role of Feedback in Test-Time Scaling of Agentic AI Workflows [71.92083784393418]
Agentic AI (systems that autonomously plan and act) are becoming widespread, yet their task success rate on complex tasks remains low.<n>Inference-time alignment relies on three components: sampling, evaluation, and feedback.<n>We introduce Iterative Agent Decoding (IAD), a procedure that repeatedly inserts feedback extracted from different forms of critiques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T17:40:47Z) - Towards more Contextual Agents: An extractor-Generator Optimization Framework [0.0]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable success in solving complex tasks across a wide range of general-purpose applications.<n>However, their performance often degrades in context-specific scenarios, such as specialized industries or research domains.<n>To address this challenge, our work introduces a systematic approach to enhance the contextual adaptability of LLM-based agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T15:07:06Z) - Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents [61.33974108405561]
We introduce the Agent-as-a-Judge framework, wherein agentic systems are used to evaluate agentic systems.
This is an organic extension of the LLM-as-a-Judge framework, incorporating agentic features that enable intermediate feedback for the entire task-solving process.
We present DevAI, a new benchmark of 55 realistic automated AI development tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T17:57:02Z) - Gödel Agent: A Self-Referential Agent Framework for Recursive Self-Improvement [112.04307762405669]
G"odel Agent is a self-evolving framework inspired by the G"odel machine.<n>G"odel Agent can achieve continuous self-improvement, surpassing manually crafted agents in performance, efficiency, and generalizability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-06T10:49:40Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.