The Global Landscape of Environmental AI Regulation: From the Cost of Reasoning to a Right to Green AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00068v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 19:20:22 GMT
• Title: The Global Landscape of Environmental AI Regulation: From the Cost of Reasoning to a Right to Green AI
• Abstract summary: We show that generative Web search and reasoning models come with much higher cumulative environmental impacts than previous generations of AI approaches.<n>We propose mandatory model-level transparency that covers inference consumption, benchmarks, and compute locations.<n>We conclude with concrete legislative proposals that could serve as templates for other jurisdictions.
• Score: 5.106335668846228
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems impose substantial and growing environmental costs, yet transparency about these impacts has declined even as their deployment has accelerated. This paper makes three contributions. First, we collate empirical evidence that generative Web search and reasoning models - which have proliferated in 2025 - come with much higher cumulative environmental impacts than previous generations of AI approaches. Second, we map the global regulatory landscape across eleven jurisdictions and find that the manner in which environmental governance operates (predominantly at the facility-level rather than the model-level, with a focus on training rather than inference, with limited AI-specific energy disclosure requirements outside the EU) limits its applicability. Third, to address this, we propose a three-pronged policy response: mandatory model-level transparency that covers inference consumption, benchmarks, and compute locations; user rights to opt out of unnecessary generative AI integration and to select environmentally optimized models; and international coordination to prevent regulatory arbitrage. We conclude with concrete legislative proposals - including amendments to the EU AI Act, Consumer Rights Directive, and Digital Services Act - that could serve as templates for other jurisdictions.

Related papers

• Security, privacy, and agentic AI in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections [53.468443050795344]
  The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has led to a dynamic regulatory landscape.<n>As AI paradigms shift towards greater autonomy, specifically in the form of agentic AI, it becomes increasingly challenging to articulate regulatory stipulations.<n>This paper reviews the evolving European Union (EU) AI regulatory provisions via analyzing 24 relevant documents published between 2024 and 2025.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T13:50:52Z)
• From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate [69.05573887799203]
  We argue that understanding these second-order impacts requires an interdisciplinary approach, combining lifecycle assessments with socio-economic analyses.<n>We contend that a narrow focus on direct emissions misrepresents AI's true climate footprint, limiting the scope for meaningful interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T22:45:06Z)
• Exploring the sustainable scaling of AI dilemma: A projective study of corporations' AI environmental impacts [0.0]
  We propose a methodology to estimate the environmental impact of a company's AI portfolio.<n>Results confirm that large generative AI models consume up to 4600x more energy than traditional models.<n>Mitigating the environmental impact of Generative AI by 2030 requires coordinated efforts across the AI value chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T08:58:49Z)
• The Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) in the AI Act: Roots, legal obligations and key elements for a model template [55.2480439325792]
  Article aims to fill existing gaps in the theoretical and methodological elaboration of the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA)<n>This article outlines the main building blocks of a model template for the FRIA.<n>It can serve as a blueprint for other national and international regulatory initiatives to ensure that AI is fully consistent with human rights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T11:55:55Z)
• AI, Climate, and Regulation: From Data Centers to the AI Act [2.874893537471256]
  We aim to provide guidance on the climate-related regulation for data centers and AI specifically.<n>We propose a specific interpretation of the AI Act to bring reporting on the previously unadressed energy consumption from AI inferences back into the scope.<n>We argue for an interpretation of the AI Act that includes environmental concerns in the mandatory risk assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T08:43:53Z)
• AI, Climate, and Transparency: Operationalizing and Improving the AI Act [2.874893537471256]
  This paper critically examines the AI Act's provisions on climate-related transparency. We identify key shortcomings, including the exclusion of energy consumption during AI inference. We propose a novel interpretation to bring inference-related energy use back within the Act's scope.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T07:57:39Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Recommendations for public action towards sustainable generative AI systems [0.0]
  This paper presents the components of the environmental footprint of generative AI. It highlights the massive CO2 emissions and water consumption associated with training large language models. The paper also explores the factors and characteristics of models that have an influence on their environmental footprint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T08:55:53Z)
• The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
  The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage. Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z)
• Sustainable AI Regulation [3.0821115746307663]
  The ICT sector contributes up to 3.9 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon footprint water consumption of AI, especially large-scale generative models like GPT-4, raise significant sustainability concerns. The paper suggests a multi-faceted approach to achieve sustainable AI regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T02:20:48Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.