Recommendations for public action towards sustainable generative AI systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01646v1
• Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:55:53 GMT
• Title: Recommendations for public action towards sustainable generative AI systems
• Authors: Thomas Le Goff (EDF)
• Abstract summary: This paper presents the components of the environmental footprint of generative AI. It highlights the massive CO2 emissions and water consumption associated with training large language models. The paper also explores the factors and characteristics of models that have an influence on their environmental footprint.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Growing awareness of the environmental impact of digital technologies has led to several isolated initiatives to promote sustainable practices. However, despite these efforts, the environmental footprint of generative AI, particularly in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption, remains considerable. This contribution first presents the components of this environmental footprint, highlighting the massive CO2 emissions and water consumption associated with training large language models, thus underlining the need to rethink learning and inference methods. The paper also explores the factors and characteristics of models that have an influence on their environmental footprint and demonstrates the existence of solutions to reduce it, such as using more efficient processors or optimising the energy performance of data centres. The potentially harmful effects of AI on the planet and its ecosystem have made environmental protection one of the founding principles of AI ethics at international and European levels. However, this recognition has not yet translated into concrete measures to address it.To address this issue, our contribution puts forward twelve pragmatic recommendations for public action to promote sustainable generative AI, in particular by building a long-term strategy to achieve carbon neutrality for AI models, encouraging international cooperation to set common standards, supporting scientific research and developing appropriate legal and regulatory frameworks.This paper seeks to inform the members of the Interministerial Committee on Generative AI about the environmental challenges of this technology by providing a brief review of the scientific literature on the subject and proposing concrete recommendations of public policy actions to reconcile technological innovation with the need to protect our environment.

Related papers

• Data Ecofeminism [0.0]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is driving significant environmental impacts. The paper calls for an urgent reassessment of the GenAI innovation race.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T11:47:50Z)
• From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate [69.05573887799203]
  Much of this debate has concentrated on direct impact without addressing the significant indirect effects. This paper examines how the problem of Jevons' Paradox applies to AI, whereby efficiency gains may paradoxically spur increased consumption. We argue that understanding these second-order impacts requires an interdisciplinary approach, combining lifecycle assessments with socio-economic analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T22:45:06Z)
• A Survey of Sustainability in Large Language Models: Applications, Economics, and Challenges [0.7889270818022226]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed numerous domains by providing advanced capabilities in natural language understanding, generation, and reasoning. Despite their groundbreaking applications across industries such as research, healthcare, and creative media, their rapid adoption raises critical concerns regarding sustainability. This survey paper examines the environmental, economic, and computational challenges associated with LLMs, focusing on energy consumption, carbon emissions, and resource utilization in data centers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T05:20:04Z)
• AI, Climate, and Transparency: Operationalizing and Improving the AI Act [2.874893537471256]
  This paper critically examines the AI Act's provisions on climate-related transparency. We identify key shortcomings, including the exclusion of energy consumption during AI inference. We propose a novel interpretation to bring inference-related energy use back within the Act's scope.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T07:57:39Z)
• Generative AI for Low-Carbon Artificial Intelligence of Things with Large Language Models [67.0243099823109]
  Generative AI (GAI) holds immense potential to reduce carbon emissions of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) In this article, we explore the potential of GAI for carbon emissions reduction and propose a novel GAI-enabled solution for low-carbon AIoT. We propose a Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled carbon emission optimization framework, in which we design pluggable LLM and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T05:46:28Z)
• On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Survey [80.21955522431168]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved significant advancements in technology and research with the development over several decades. The needs for high computing power brings higher carbon emission and undermines research fairness. To tackle the challenges of computing resources and environmental impact of AI, Green Computing has become a hot research topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T11:16:41Z)
• AI For Global Climate Cooperation 2023 Competition Proceedings [77.07135605362795]
  No global authority can ensure compliance with international climate agreements. RICE-N supports modeling regional decision-making using AI agents. The IAM then models the climate-economic impact of those decisions into the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T20:05:42Z)
• Sustainable AI Regulation [3.0821115746307663]
  The ICT sector contributes up to 3.9 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon footprint water consumption of AI, especially large-scale generative models like GPT-4, raise significant sustainability concerns. The paper suggests a multi-faceted approach to achieve sustainable AI regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T02:20:48Z)
• Towards Sustainable Artificial Intelligence: An Overview of Environmental Protection Uses and Issues [0.0]
  This paper describes the paradox of an energy-consuming technology serving the ecological challenges of tomorrow. It draws on numerous examples from AI for Green players to present use cases and concrete examples. The environmental dimension is part of the broader ethical problem of AI, and addressing it is crucial for ensuring the sustainability of AI in the long term.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T14:31:48Z)
• Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the first step towards sustainable AI [47.130004596434816]
  In eco2AI we put emphasis on accuracy of energy consumption tracking and correct regional CO2 emissions accounting. The motivation also comes from the concept of AI-based green house gases sequestrating cycle with both Sustainable AI and Green AI pathways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-31T09:34:53Z)
• Leveraging traditional ecological knowledge in ecosystem restoration projects utilizing machine learning [77.34726150561087]
  Community engagement throughout the stages of ecosystem restoration projects could contribute to improved community well-being. We suggest that adaptive and scalable practices could incentivize interdisciplinary collaboration during all stages of ecosystemic ML restoration projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T16:17:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.