Where Do LLM-based Systems Break? A System-Level Security Framework for Risk Assessment and Treatment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07460v1
• Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2026 04:30:27 GMT
• Title: Where Do LLM-based Systems Break? A System-Level Security Framework for Risk Assessment and Treatment
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into safety-critical systems.<n>This work introduces a goal-driven risk assessment framework for LLM-powered systems.<n>We demonstrate the framework through a healthcare case study.
• Score: 0.5801044612920815
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into safety-critical workflows, yet existing security analyses remain fragmented and often isolate model behavior from the broader system context. This work introduces a goal-driven risk assessment framework for LLM-powered systems that combines system modeling with Attack-Defense Trees (ADTrees) and Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)-based exploitability scoring to support structured, comparable analysis. We demonstrate the framework through a healthcare case study, modeling multi-step attack paths targeting intervention in medical procedures, leakage of electronic health record (EHR) data, and disruption of service availability. Our analysis indicates that threats spanning (i) conventional cyber, (ii) adversarial ML, and (iii) conversational attacks that manipulate prompts or context often consolidate into a small number of dominant paths and shared system choke points, enabling targeted defenses to yield meaningful reductions in path exploitability. By systematically comparing defense portfolios, we align these risks with established vulnerability management practices and provide a domain-agnostic workflow applicable to other LLM-enabled critical systems.

Related papers

• Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerability [65.56750741053266]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed misinformation from a content-centric problem into a broader ecosystem-level security challenge.<n>In this paper, we introduce a role-layer framework to unify these risks and defenses.<n>The role characterizes LLMs as attackers, defenders, and vulnerable components of verification systems, while the layer dimension covers content, social contexts, evidence environments, and verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-11T17:04:17Z)
• MATRA: Modeling the Attack Surface of Agentic AI Systems -- OpenClaw Case Study [33.739271128194204]
  We present MATRA, a pragmatic threat modeling framework for agentic AI systems.<n>We show how architectural controls such as network sandboxing and least-privilege access reduce risk by limiting the blast radius of successful injections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T15:58:37Z)
• Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Autonomous LLM Agent Threats [29.43070870263607]
  We present a comprehensive security threat analysis of OpenClaw.<n>We examine threats across the agent's operational lifecycle, including indirect prompt injection, skill supply chain contamination, memory poisoning, and intent drift.<n>Our findings reveal critical weaknesses in current point-based defense mechanisms when addressing cross-temporal and multi-stage systemic risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T07:24:05Z)
• Goal-Driven Risk Assessment for LLM-Powered Systems: A Healthcare Case Study [0.5801044612920815]
  We propose a structured, goal driven risk assessment approach that contextualizes the threats with detailed attack vectors, preconditions, and attack paths through the use of attack trees.<n>This study harmonizes the state-of-the-art attacks to LLMs with conventional ones and presents possible attack paths applicable to similar systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T01:49:48Z)
• Odysseus: Jailbreaking Commercial Multimodal LLM-integrated Systems via Dual Steganography [77.44136793431893]
  We propose a novel jailbreak paradigm that introduces dual steganography to covertly embed malicious queries into benign-looking images.<n>Our Odysseus successfully jailbreaks several pioneering and realistic MLLM-integrated systems, achieving up to 99% attack success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T08:53:36Z)
• AttackVLA: Benchmarking Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models [60.39655329875822]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to interpret natural-language instructions and perform diverse tasks.<n>Despite growing interest in attacking such models, the effectiveness of existing techniques remains unclear.<n>We propose AttackVLA, a unified framework that aligns with the VLA development lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T10:30:46Z)
• NeuroBreak: Unveil Internal Jailbreak Mechanisms in Large Language Models [68.09675063543402]
  NeuroBreak is a top-down jailbreak analysis system designed to analyze neuron-level safety mechanisms and mitigate vulnerabilities.<n>By incorporating layer-wise representation probing analysis, NeuroBreak offers a novel perspective on the model's decision-making process.<n>We conduct quantitative evaluations and case studies to verify the effectiveness of our system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T08:12:06Z)
• A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives [65.3369988566853]
  Recent studies have demonstrated that adversaries can replicate a target model's functionality.<n>Model Extraction Attacks pose threats to intellectual property, privacy, and system security.<n>We propose a novel taxonomy that classifies MEAs according to attack mechanisms, defense approaches, and computing environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T19:49:59Z)
• Expert-in-the-Loop Systems with Cross-Domain and In-Domain Few-Shot Learning for Software Vulnerability Detection [38.083049237330826]
  This study explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in software vulnerability assessment by simulating the identification of Python code with known Common Weaknessions (CWEs)<n>Our results indicate that while zero-shot prompting performs poorly, few-shot prompting significantly enhances classification performance.<n> challenges such as model reliability, interpretability, and adversarial robustness remain critical areas for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T18:43:51Z)
• Systematic Hazard Analysis for Frontier AI using STPA [0.0]
  frontier AI companies currently do not describe in detail any structured approach to identifying and analysing hazards.<n>A (Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis) is a systematic methodology for identifying how complex systems can become unsafe, leading to hazards.<n>We evaluateA's ability to broaden the scope, improve traceability and strengthen the robustness of safety assurance for frontier AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T15:28:34Z)
• Threat Modelling and Risk Analysis for Large Language Model (LLM)-Powered Applications [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various applications by providing advanced natural language processing capabilities. This paper explores the threat modeling and risk analysis specifically tailored for LLM-powered applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T16:43:58Z)
• Mapping LLM Security Landscapes: A Comprehensive Stakeholder Risk Assessment Proposal [0.0]
  We propose a risk assessment process using tools like the risk rating methodology which is used for traditional systems. We conduct scenario analysis to identify potential threat agents and map the dependent system components against vulnerability factors. We also map threats against three key stakeholder groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T05:17:22Z)
• MF-CLIP: Leveraging CLIP as Surrogate Models for No-box Adversarial Attacks [65.86360607693457]
  No-box attacks, where adversaries have no prior knowledge, remain relatively underexplored despite its practical relevance.<n>This work presents a systematic investigation into leveraging large-scale Vision-Language Models (VLMs) as surrogate models for executing no-box attacks.<n>Our theoretical and empirical analyses reveal a key limitation in the execution of no-box attacks stemming from insufficient discriminative capabilities for direct application of vanilla CLIP as a surrogate model.<n>We propose MF-CLIP: a novel framework that enhances CLIP's effectiveness as a surrogate model through margin-aware feature space optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T08:10:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.