Does Reasoning Make Search More Fair? Comparing Fairness in Reasoning and Non-Reasoning Rerankers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10332v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 02:01:24 GMT
• Title: Does Reasoning Make Search More Fair? Comparing Fairness in Reasoning and Non-Reasoning Rerankers
• Abstract summary: We conduct the first systematic comparison of fairness between reasoning and non-reasoning rerankers.<n>Our findings demonstrate reasoning neither improve nor harm fairness compared to non-reasoning approaches.
• Score: 56.54960821093771
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While reasoning rerankers, such as Rank1, have demonstrated strong abilities in improving ranking relevance, it is unclear how they perform on other retrieval qualities such as fairness. We conduct the first systematic comparison of fairness between reasoning and non-reasoning rerankers. Using the TREC 2022 Fair Ranking Track dataset, we evaluate six reranking models across multiple retrieval settings and demographic attributes. Our findings demonstrate reasoning neither improve nor harm fairness compared to non-reasoning approaches. Our fairness metric, Attention-Weighted Rank Fairness (AWRF) remained stable (0.33-0.35) across all models, even as relevance varies substantially (nDCG 0.247-1.000). Demographic breakdown analysis revealed fairness gaps for geographic attributes regardless of model architecture. These results indicate that future work in specializing reasoning models to be aware of fairness attributes could lead to improvements, as current implementations preserve the fairness characteristics of their input ranking.

Related papers

• Towards counterfactual fairness through auxiliary variables [11.756940915048713]
  We introduce EXOgenous Causal reasoning (EXOC), a novel causal reasoning framework motivated by variables.<n>Our framework explicitly defines an auxiliary node and a control node that contribute to counterfactual fairness.<n>Our evaluation, conducted on synthetic and real-world datasets, validates EXOC's superiority.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T04:23:05Z)
• Learn to be Fair without Labels: a Distribution-based Learning Framework for Fair Ranking [1.8577028544235155]
  We propose a distribution-based fair learning framework (DLF) that does not require labels by replacing the unavailable fairness labels with target fairness exposure distributions. Our proposed framework achieves better fairness performance while maintaining better control over the fairness-relevance trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T03:49:04Z)
• What Hides behind Unfairness? Exploring Dynamics Fairness in Reinforcement Learning [52.51430732904994]
  In reinforcement learning problems, agents must consider long-term fairness while maximizing returns. Recent works have proposed many different types of fairness notions, but how unfairness arises in RL problems remains unclear. We introduce a novel notion called dynamics fairness, which explicitly captures the inequality stemming from environmental dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T22:47:59Z)
• Distributionally Generative Augmentation for Fair Facial Attribute Classification [69.97710556164698]
  Facial Attribute Classification (FAC) holds substantial promise in widespread applications. FAC models trained by traditional methodologies can be unfair by exhibiting accuracy inconsistencies across varied data subpopulations. This work proposes a novel, generation-based two-stage framework to train a fair FAC model on biased data without additional annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T10:50:53Z)
• Classes Are Not Equal: An Empirical Study on Image Recognition Fairness [100.36114135663836]
  We experimentally demonstrate that classes are not equal and the fairness issue is prevalent for image classification models across various datasets. Our findings reveal that models tend to exhibit greater prediction biases for classes that are more challenging to recognize. Data augmentation and representation learning algorithms improve overall performance by promoting fairness to some degree in image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T07:54:50Z)
• Fairness Under Demographic Scarce Regime [7.523105080786704]
  We propose a framework to build attribute classifiers that achieve better fairness-accuracy tradeoffs. We show that enforcing fairness constraints on samples with uncertain sensitive attributes can negatively impact the fairness-accuracy tradeoff. Our framework can outperform models trained with fairness constraints on the true sensitive attributes in most benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T19:07:34Z)
• DualFair: Fair Representation Learning at Both Group and Individual Levels via Contrastive Self-supervision [73.80009454050858]
  This work presents a self-supervised model, called DualFair, that can debias sensitive attributes like gender and race from learned representations. Our model jointly optimize for two fairness criteria - group fairness and counterfactual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T07:13:54Z)
• FairAdaBN: Mitigating unfairness with adaptive batch normalization and its application to dermatological disease classification [14.589159162086926]
  We propose FairAdaBN, which makes batch normalization adaptive to sensitive attribute. We propose a new metric, named Fairness-Accuracy Trade-off Efficiency (FATE), to compute normalized fairness improvement over accuracy drop. Experiments on two dermatological datasets show that our proposed method outperforms other methods on fairness criteria and FATE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T02:22:07Z)
• Learning Fair Node Representations with Graph Counterfactual Fairness [56.32231787113689]
  We propose graph counterfactual fairness, which considers the biases led by the above facts. We generate counterfactuals corresponding to perturbations on each node's and their neighbors' sensitive attributes. Our framework outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines in graph counterfactual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T21:43:44Z)
• Adversarial Learning for Counterfactual Fairness [15.302633901803526]
  In recent years, fairness has become an important topic in the machine learning research community. We propose to rely on an adversarial neural learning approach, that enables more powerful inference than with MMD penalties. Experiments show significant improvements in term of counterfactual fairness for both the discrete and the continuous settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-30T09:06:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.