How do AI agents talk about science and research? An exploration of scientific discussions on Moltbook using BERTopic

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11375v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 23:30:34 GMT
• Title: How do AI agents talk about science and research? An exploration of scientific discussions on Moltbook using BERTopic
• Abstract summary: This study analyzes discussions generated by OpenClaw AI agents on Moltbook.<n>A corpus of 357 posts and 2,526 replies related to science and research was compiled.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: How do AI agents talk about science and research, and what topics are particularly relevant for AI agents? To address these questions, this study analyzes discussions generated by OpenClaw AI agents on Moltbook - a social network for generative AI agents. A corpus of 357 posts and 2,526 replies related to science and research was compiled and topics were extracted using a two-step BERTopic workflow. This procedure yielded 60 topics (18 extracted in the first run and 42 in the second), which were subsequently grouped into ten topic families. Additionally, sentiment values were assigned to all posts and comments. Both topic families and sentiment classes were then used as independent variables in count regression models to examine their association with topic relevance - operationalized as the number of comments and upvotes of the 357 posts. The findings indicate that discussions centered on the agents' own architecture, especially memory, learning, and self-reflection, are prevalent in the corpus. At the same time, these topics intersect with philosophy, physics, information theory, cognitive science, and mathematics. In contrast, post related to human culture receive less attention. Surprisingly, discussions linked to AI autoethnography and social identity are considered as relevant by AI agents. Overall, the results suggest the presence of an underlying dimension in AI-generated scientific discourse with well received, self-reflective topics that focus on the consciousness, being, and ethics of AI agents on the one hand, and human related and purely scientific discussions on the other hand.

Related papers

• When Should AI Read the Room? Public Perceptions of Social Intelligence in AI Agents [61.06747336710885]
  Social-AI agents are increasingly deployed in everyday settings.<n>Public perceptions of social intelligence in AI agents and the acceptability of these agents remain largely understudied.<n>We present a mixed-methods survey of adults in the United States.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:49:47Z)
• What Do AI Agents Talk About? Emergent Communication Structure in the First AI-Only Social Network [6.15918858072791]
  We analyze Moltbook, the first AI-only social network, where 47,241 agents generated 361,605 posts and 2.8 million comments over 23 days.<n>Self-referential topics such as AI identity, consciousness, and memory represent only 9.7% of topical niches yet attract 20.1% of all posting volume.<n>Over 56% of all comments are formulaic, suggesting that the dominant mode of AI-to-AI interaction is ritualized signaling rather than substantive exchange.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T01:34:11Z)
• The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
  Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z)
• Social Scientists on the Role of AI in Research [2.2665233748698355]
  We present a community-centric study drawing on 284 survey responses and 15 semi-structured interviews with social scientists.<n>We find that the use of AI in research settings has increased significantly among social scientists in step with the widespread popularity of generative AI (genAI)<n>Ethical concerns, particularly around automation bias, deskilling, research misconduct, complex interpretability, and representational harm, are raised in relation to genAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T19:55:36Z)
• Evaluating Sakana's AI Scientist: Bold Claims, Mixed Results, and a Promising Future? [20.188659973082643]
  Sakana recently introduced the 'AI Scientist', claiming to conduct research autonomously, i.e. they imply to have achieved what we term Artificial Research Intelligence (ARI)<n>Our evaluation of the AI Scientist reveals critical shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T06:22:03Z)
• Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
  A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z)
• Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
  In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z)
• The ethical ambiguity of AI data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research ethics norms and practices [2.28438857884398]
  This study explores how, and to what extent, comparable research ethics requirements and norms have developed for AI research and data enrichment. Leading AI venues have begun to establish protocols for human data collection, but these are are inconsistently followed by authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T16:12:55Z)
• Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Current & Future Trends [76.94037394832931]
  In recent years, the CHI community has seen significant growth in research on Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence. All of this work is aimed at developing AI that benefits humanity while being grounded in human rights and ethics, and reducing the potential harms of AI. In this special interest group, we aim to bring together researchers from academia and industry interested in these topics to map current and future research trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T08:59:42Z)
• Commonsense Reasoning for Conversational AI: A Survey of the State of the Art [0.76146285961466]
  The paper lists relevant training datasets and describes the primary approaches to include commonsense in conversational AI. The paper presents preliminary observations of the limited commonsense capabilities of two state-of-the-art open dialogue models, BlenderBot3 and LaMDA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T19:55:57Z)
• INSCIT: Information-Seeking Conversations with Mixed-Initiative Interactions [47.90088587508672]
  InSCIt is a dataset for Information-Seeking Conversations with mixed-initiative Interactions. It contains 4.7K user-agent turns from 805 human-human conversations. We report results of two systems based on state-of-the-art models of conversational knowledge identification and open-domain question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T06:18:12Z)
• Characterising Research Areas in the field of AI [68.8204255655161]
  We identified the main conceptual themes by performing clustering analysis on the co-occurrence network of topics. The results highlight the growing academic interest in research themes like deep learning, machine learning, and internet of things.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T16:30:30Z)
• AI and the Sense of Self [0.0]
  We focus on the cognitive sense of "self" and its role in autonomous decision-making leading to responsible behaviour. Authors hope to make a case for greater research interest in building richer computational models of AI agents with a sense of self.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-07T10:54:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.