Toward Evaluation Frameworks for Multi-Agent Scientific AI Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26718v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 16:05:52 GMT
• Title: Toward Evaluation Frameworks for Multi-Agent Scientific AI Systems
• Abstract summary: We analyze the challenges of benchmarking scientific (multi)-agentic systems.<n>We discuss strategies for constructing contamination-resistant problems.<n>We discuss the results of interviews with several researchers and engineers working in quantum science.
• Score: 0.22843885788439797
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We analyze the challenges of benchmarking scientific (multi)-agentic systems, including the difficulty of distinguishing reasoning from retrieval, the risks of data/model contamination, the lack of reliable ground truth for novel research problems, the complications introduced by tool use, and the replication challenges due to the continuously changing/updating knowledge base. We discuss strategies for constructing contamination-resistant problems, generating scalable families of tasks, and the need for evaluating systems through multi-turn interactions that better reflect real scientific practice. As an early feasibility test, we demonstrate how to construct a dataset of novel research ideas to test the out-of-sample performance of our system. We also discuss the results of interviews with several researchers and engineers working in quantum science. Through those interviews, we examine how scientists expect to interact with AI systems and how these expectations should shape evaluation methods.

Related papers

• Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales [118.2204632627895]
  SciAgentArena is a systematic benchmark for evaluating AI agents in real-world scientific research scenarios.<n>It comprises approximately 200 tasks with stepwise verification and an interactive, agent-agnostic environment for assessing diverse AI agents.<n>We find that current agents can contribute effectively to well-specified data-analysis, particularly when the task structure and evaluation criteria are clear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T22:55:30Z)
• Pitfalls in Evaluating Interpretability Agents [91.49742416116635]
  We build an agentic system in which a research agent iteratively designs experiments and refines hypotheses.<n>Our work demonstrates fundamental challenges in evaluating complex automated interpretability systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T16:27:17Z)
• The Story is Not the Science: Execution-Grounded Evaluation of Mechanistic Interpretability Research [56.80927148740585]
  We address the challenges of scalability and rigor by flipping the dynamic and developing AI agents as research evaluators.<n>We use mechanistic interpretability research as a testbed, build standardized research output, and develop MechEvalAgent.<n>Our work demonstrates the potential of AI agents to transform research evaluation and pave the way for rigorous scientific practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T19:00:02Z)
• Opportunities in AI/ML for the Rubin LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration [63.61423859450929]
  This white paper surveys the current landscape of AI/ML across DESC's primary cosmological probes and cross-cutting analyses.<n>We identify key methodological research priorities, including Bayesian inference at scale, physics-informed methods, validation frameworks, and active learning for discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T18:46:42Z)
• SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
  SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z)
• Cross-Disciplinary Knowledge Retrieval and Synthesis: A Compound AI Architecture for Scientific Discovery [1.5143261755366868]
  BioSage is a novel compound AI architecture that integrates LLMs with RAG, orchestrated specialized agents and tools to enable discoveries across AI, data science, biomedical, and biosecurity domains.<n>Our system features several specialized agents including the retrieval agent with query planning and response synthesis that enable knowledge retrieval across domains with citation-backed responses.<n>Our ongoing work focuses on multimodal retrieval and reasoning over charts, tables, and structured scientific data, along with developing comprehensive multimodal benchmarks for cross-disciplinary discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T05:33:11Z)
• AgenticSciML: Collaborative Multi-Agent Systems for Emergent Discovery in Scientific Machine Learning [0.0]
  AgenticSciML is a collaborative multi-agent system in which over 10 specialized AI agents collaborate to propose, critique, and refine SciML solutions.<n>The framework integrates structured debate, retrieval-augmented method memory, and ensemble-guided evolutionary search.<n>Results show that collaborative reasoning among AI agents can yield emergent methodological innovation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T16:06:33Z)
• BLADE: Benchmarking Language Model Agents for Data-Driven Science [21.682416167339635]
  LM-based agents equipped with planning, memory, and code execution capabilities have the potential to support data-driven science.<n>We present BLADE, a benchmark to automatically evaluate agents' multifaceted approaches to open-ended research questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T02:59:35Z)
• DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents [49.74065769505137]
  We introduce DISCOVERYWORLD, the first virtual environment for developing and benchmarking an agent's ability to perform complete cycles of novel scientific discovery. It includes 120 different challenge tasks spanning eight topics each with three levels of difficulty and several parametric variations. We find that strong baseline agents, that perform well in prior published environments, struggle on most DISCOVERYWORLD tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T20:08:44Z)
• ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models [56.08917291606421]
  ResearchAgent is an AI-based system for ideation and operationalization of novel work.<n>ResearchAgent automatically defines novel problems, proposes methods and designs experiments, while iteratively refining them.<n>We experimentally validate our ResearchAgent on scientific publications across multiple disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T13:36:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.