Variational LSTM with Augmented Inputs: Nonlinear Response History Metamodeling with Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01587v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 03:58:05 GMT
• Title: Variational LSTM with Augmented Inputs: Nonlinear Response History Metamodeling with Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty
• Abstract summary: Uncertainty propagation is pivotal in performance-based design and risk assessment.<n>Machine learning techniques are introduced as metamodels to alleviate this burden.<n>"Black box" nature of Machine learning models underscores the necessity of avoiding overly confident predictions.
• Score: 3.752822608245824
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Uncertainty propagation in high-dimensional nonlinear dynamic structural systems is pivotal in state-of-the-art performance-based design and risk assessment, where uncertainties from both excitations and structures, i.e., the aleatoric uncertainty, must be considered. This poses a significant challenge due to heavy computational demands. Machine learning techniques are thus introduced as metamodels to alleviate this burden. However, the "black box" nature of Machine learning models underscores the necessity of avoiding overly confident predictions, particularly when data and training efforts are insufficient. This creates a need, in addition to considering the aleatoric uncertainty, of estimating the uncertainty related to the prediction confidence, i.e., epistemic uncertainty, for machine learning-based metamodels. We developed a probabilistic metamodeling technique based on a variational long short-term memory (LSTM) with augmented inputs to simultaneously capture aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Key random system parameters are treated as augmented inputs alongside excitation series carrying record-to-record variability to capture the full range of aleatoric uncertainty. Meanwhile, epistemic uncertainty is effectively approximated via the Monte Carlo dropout scheme. Unlike computationally expensive full Bayesian approaches, this method incurs negligible additional training costs while enabling nearly cost-free uncertainty simulation. The proposed technique is demonstrated through multiple case studies involving stochastic seismic or wind excitations. Results show that the calibrated metamodels accurately reproduce nonlinear response time histories and provide confidence bounds indicating the associated epistemic uncertainty.

Related papers

• Cooperative Bayesian and variance networks disentangle aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties [0.0]
  Real-world data contains aleatoric uncertainty - irreducible noise arising from imperfect measurements or from incomplete knowledge about the data generation process.<n>Mean variance estimation (MVE) networks can learn this type of uncertainty but require ad-hoc regularization strategies to avoid overfitting.<n>We propose to train a variance network with a Bayesian neural network and demonstrate that the resulting model disentangles aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties while improving the mean estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-05T15:50:52Z)
• ConfEviSurrogate: A Conformalized Evidential Surrogate Model for Uncertainty Quantification [19.44456342675541]
  Surrogate models, crucial for approximating complex simulation data across sciences, inherently carry uncertainties that range from simulation noise to model prediction errors.<n>We introduce ConfEviSurrogate, a novel Conformalized Evidential Surrogate Model that can efficiently learn high-order evidential distributions.<n>Our model demonstrates accurate predictions and robust uncertainty estimates in diverse simulations, including cosmology, ocean dynamics, and fluid dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T15:44:14Z)
• Do you understand epistemic uncertainty? Think again! Rigorous frequentist epistemic uncertainty estimation in regression [37.422257886583424]
  We train models to generate conditional predictions by feeding their initial output back as an additional input.<n>This method allows for a rigorous measurement of model uncertainty by observing how prediction responses change when conditioned on the model's previous answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T15:54:57Z)
• Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling [69.83976050879318]
  In large language models (LLMs), identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:58:35Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• Lightweight, Uncertainty-Aware Conformalized Visual Odometry [2.429910016019183]
  Data-driven visual odometry (VO) is a critical subroutine for autonomous edge robotics. Emerging edge robotics devices like insect-scale drones and surgical robots lack a computationally efficient framework to estimate VO's predictive uncertainties. This paper presents a novel, lightweight, and statistically robust framework that leverages conformal inference (CI) to extract VO's uncertainty bands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T20:37:55Z)
• Probabilities Are Not Enough: Formal Controller Synthesis for Stochastic Dynamical Models with Epistemic Uncertainty [68.00748155945047]
  Capturing uncertainty in models of complex dynamical systems is crucial to designing safe controllers. Several approaches use formal abstractions to synthesize policies that satisfy temporal specifications related to safety and reachability. Our contribution is a novel abstraction-based controller method for continuous-state models with noise, uncertain parameters, and external disturbances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T07:57:03Z)
• The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regression [72.30888739450343]
  A new approach with uncertainty-aware regression-based neural networks (NNs) shows promise over traditional deterministic methods and typical Bayesian NNs. We detail the theoretical shortcomings and analyze the performance on synthetic and real-world data sets, showing that Deep Evidential Regression is a quantification rather than an exact uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T10:10:32Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• Deep Learning based Uncertainty Decomposition for Real-time Control [9.067368638784355]
  We propose a novel method for detecting the absence of training data using deep learning. We show its advantages over existing approaches on synthetic and real-world datasets. We further demonstrate the practicality of this uncertainty estimate in deploying online data-efficient control on a simulated quadcopter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T10:46:27Z)
• Learning to Predict Error for MRI Reconstruction [67.76632988696943]
  We demonstrate that predictive uncertainty estimated by the current methods does not highly correlate with prediction error. We propose a novel method that estimates the target labels and magnitude of the prediction error in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T15:55:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.