Discovering Failure Modes in Vision-Language Models using RL

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04733v1
• Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 15:00:54 GMT
• Title: Discovering Failure Modes in Vision-Language Models using RL
• Abstract summary: Vision-language Models (VLMs) often misinterpret straightforward visual concepts that humans identify effortlessly.<n>Previous studies manually identified these weaknesses and found that they often stem from deficits in specific skills.<n>We propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based framework to automatically discover the failure modes or blind spots of any candidate VLM.
• Score: 28.02753553386619
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language Models (VLMs), despite achieving strong performance on multimodal benchmarks, often misinterpret straightforward visual concepts that humans identify effortlessly, such as counting, spatial reasoning, and viewpoint understanding. Previous studies manually identified these weaknesses and found that they often stem from deficits in specific skills. However, such manual efforts are costly, unscalable, and subject to human bias, which often overlooks subtle details in favor of salient objects, resulting in an incomplete understanding of a model's vulnerabilities. To address these limitations, we propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based framework to automatically discover the failure modes or blind spots of any candidate VLM on a given data distribution without human intervention. Our framework trains a questioner agent that adaptively generates queries based on the candidate VLM's responses to elicit incorrect answers. Our approach increases question complexity by focusing on fine-grained visual details and distinct skill compositions as training progresses, consequently identifying 36 novel failure modes in which VLMs struggle. We demonstrate the broad applicability of our framework by showcasing its generalizability across various model combinations.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: From Evaluation to Diagnosis [63.49939245944781]
  We introduce FG-BMK, a comprehensive fine-grained evaluation benchmark containing 1.01 million questions and 0.28 million images.<n>We find that current LVLMs remain inadequate fine-grained recognizers, with failures arising from intertwined bottlenecks in visual representations, semantic grounding, modality alignment, and category-level knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T13:23:26Z)
• MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental Imagery [63.285794947638614]
  We develop MentisOculi, a suite of multi-step reasoning problems amenable to visual solution.<n> evaluating visual strategies ranging from latent tokens to explicit generated imagery, we find they generally fail to improve performance.<n>Our findings suggest that despite their inherent appeal, visual thoughts do not yet benefit model reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T18:49:06Z)
• AMVICC: A Novel Benchmark for Cross-Modal Failure Mode Profiling for VLMs and IGMs [2.357397994148727]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and image generation models (IGMs) were investigated.<n>We created a novel benchmark to compare failure modes across image-to-text and text-to-image tasks.<n>Our results show that failure modes are often shared between models and modalities, but certain failures are model-specific and modality-specific.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T00:06:58Z)
• Beyond Generation: Multi-Hop Reasoning for Factual Accuracy in Vision-Language Models [0.0]
  Visual Language Models (VLMs) are powerful generative tools but often produce factually in- accurate outputs.<n>This work introduces a framework for knowledge-guided reasoning inVLMs, leverag- ing structured knowledge graphs for multi-hop verification.<n>We evaluate the framework using hi- erarchical, triple-based and bullet-point based knowledge representations, analyzing their ef-fectiveness in factual accuracy and logical infer- ence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T17:34:32Z)
• Training-free Uncertainty Guidance for Complex Visual Tasks with MLLMs [61.64185573373394]
  We propose a training-free framework that uses an MLLM's intrinsic uncertainty as a proactive guidance signal.<n>We introduce a unified mechanism that scores candidate visual inputs by response uncertainty, enabling the model to autonomously focus on the most salient data.<n>Our work validates that harnessing intrinsic uncertainty is a powerful, general strategy for enhancing fine-grained multimodal performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T09:20:51Z)
• Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting [70.83781268763215]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive performance across diverse multimodal tasks by leveraging large-scale pre-training.<n>VLMs face unique challenges such as cross-modal feature drift, parameter interference due to shared architectures, and zero-shot capability erosion.<n>This survey aims to serve as a comprehensive and diagnostic reference for researchers developing lifelong vision-language systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T09:03:10Z)
• Preference Learning for AI Alignment: a Causal Perspective [55.2480439325792]
  We frame this problem in a causal paradigm, providing the rich toolbox of causality to identify persistent challenges.<n>Inheriting from the literature of causal inference, we identify key assumptions necessary for reliable generalisation.<n>We illustrate failure modes of naive reward models and demonstrate how causally-inspired approaches can improve model robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T10:45:42Z)
• Unsupervised Model Diagnosis [49.36194740479798]
  This paper proposes Unsupervised Model Diagnosis (UMO) to produce semantic counterfactual explanations without any user guidance. Our approach identifies and visualizes changes in semantics, and then matches these changes to attributes from wide-ranging text sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:59:03Z)
• NPHardEval4V: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models with Effects of Vision [64.83085920775316]
  We introduce NPHardEval4V, a multimodal benchmark suite grounded in four classical NP-hard problems.<n>Each task is presented through a combination of structured visual layouts and textual prompts, designed to assess the ability of LVLMs to perform reasoning under visual-linguistic constraints.<n>Our results show that while these models perform reasonably well on perception-based inputs, they struggle with global optimization, abstraction, and constraint satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T07:10:31Z)
• Benchmarking Zero-Shot Recognition with Vision-Language Models: Challenges on Granularity and Specificity [45.86789047206224]
  This paper presents novel benchmarks for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) in zero-shot recognition. Our benchmarks test VLMs' consistency in understanding concepts across semantic granularity levels and their response to varying text specificity. Findings show that VLMs favor moderately fine-grained concepts and struggle with specificity, often misjudging texts that differ from their training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T09:29:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.