Do We Really Need to Approach the Entire Pareto Front in Many-Objective Bayesian Optimisation?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09417v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:27:49 GMT
• Title: Do We Really Need to Approach the Entire Pareto Front in Many-Objective Bayesian Optimisation?
• Abstract summary: Many-objective optimisation involves optimisation problems with more than three objectives.<n>As the number of objectives increases, the number of solutions needed to adequately represent the entire Pareto front typically grows substantially.<n>This paper proposes a underlinesingle underlinepoint-based underlinemulti-underlineobjective search framework (SPMO) that aims to improve the quality of solutions along a direction that leads to a good tradeoff between objectives.
• Score: 10.970091142734603
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Many-objective optimisation, a subset of multi-objective optimisation, involves optimisation problems with more than three objectives. As the number of objectives increases, the number of solutions needed to adequately represent the entire Pareto front typically grows substantially. This makes it challenging, if not infeasible, to design a search algorithm capable of effectively exploring the entire Pareto front. This difficulty is particularly acute in the Bayesian optimisation paradigm, where sample efficiency is critical and only a limited number of solutions (often a few hundred) are evaluated. Moreover, after the optimisation process, the decision-maker eventually selects just one solution for deployment, regardless of how many high-quality, diverse solutions are available. In light of this, we argue an idea that under a very limited evaluation budget, it may be more useful to focus on finding a single solution of the highest possible quality for the decision-maker, rather than aiming to approximate the entire Pareto front as existing many-/multi-objective Bayesian optimisation methods typically do. Bearing this idea in mind, this paper proposes a \underline{s}ingle \underline{p}oint-based \underline{m}ulti-\underline{o}bjective search framework (SPMO) that aims to improve the quality of solutions along a direction that leads to a good tradeoff between objectives. Within SPMO, we present a simple acquisition function, called expected single-point improvement (ESPI), working under both noiseless and noisy scenarios. We show that ESPI can be optimised effectively with gradient-based methods via the sample average approximation (SAA) approach and theoretically prove its convergence guarantees under the SAA. We also empirically demonstrate that the proposed SPMO is computationally tractable and outperforms state-of-the-arts on a wide range of benchmark and real-world problems.

Related papers

• Diversity-Driven Offline Multi-Objective Optimization via Nested Pareto Set Learning [11.1141573484419]
  Multi-objective optimization (MOO) has emerged as a powerful approach to solving complex optimization problems involving multiple objectives.<n>This paper proposes Diversity-driven Offline Multi-Objective Optimization (DOMOO), which aims to find out a diverse and high-quality set of solutions.<n>Experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks show that DOMOO achieves the best average rank across tasks in both convergence and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-13T05:09:25Z)
• Parametric Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization via Generative Solution Modeling [34.344228998247225]
  This paper introduces the first parametric multi-objective Bayesian that learns this inverse model by alternating between acquisition-driven search and generative models.<n>We theoretically justify the faster convergence by leveraging inter-task synergies through task-aware Gaussian processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T15:13:27Z)
• Bounded Rationality for LLMs: Satisficing Alignment at Inference-Time [52.230936493691985]
  We propose SITAlign, an inference framework that addresses the multifaceted nature of alignment by maximizing a primary objective while satisfying threshold-based constraints on secondary criteria.<n>We provide theoretical insights by deriving sub-optimality bounds of our satisficing based inference alignment approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:56:05Z)
• Scalable Min-Max Optimization via Primal-Dual Exact Pareto Optimization [66.51747366239299]
  We propose a smooth variant of the min-max problem based on the augmented Lagrangian.<n>The proposed algorithm scales better with the number of objectives than subgradient-based strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T11:05:51Z)
• Preference-Optimized Pareto Set Learning for Blackbox Optimization [1.9628841617148691]
  No single solution exists that can optimize all the objectives simultaneously. In a typical MOO problem, the goal is to find a set of optimum solutions (Pareto set) that trades off the preferences among objectives. Our formulation leads to a bilevel optimization problem that can be solved by e.g. differentiable cross-entropy methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T13:23:07Z)
• Optimizing Solution-Samplers for Combinatorial Problems: The Landscape of Policy-Gradient Methods [52.0617030129699]
  We introduce a novel theoretical framework for analyzing the effectiveness of DeepMatching Networks and Reinforcement Learning methods. Our main contribution holds for a broad class of problems including Max-and Min-Cut, Max-$k$-Bipartite-Bi, Maximum-Weight-Bipartite-Bi, and Traveling Salesman Problem. As a byproduct of our analysis we introduce a novel regularization process over vanilla descent and provide theoretical and experimental evidence that it helps address vanishing-gradient issues and escape bad stationary points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T23:39:38Z)
• BOtied: Multi-objective Bayesian optimization with tied multivariate ranks [33.414682601242006]
  In this paper, we show a natural connection between non-dominated solutions and the extreme quantile of the joint cumulative distribution function. Motivated by this link, we propose the Pareto-compliant CDF indicator and the associated acquisition function, BOtied. Our experiments on a variety of synthetic and real-world problems demonstrate that BOtied outperforms state-of-the-art MOBO acquisition functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T04:50:06Z)
• Joint Entropy Search for Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization [0.0]
  We propose a novel information-theoretic acquisition function for BO called Joint Entropy Search. We showcase the effectiveness of this new approach on a range of synthetic and real-world problems in terms of the hypervolume and its weighted variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T13:19:08Z)
• A Robust Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization Framework Considering Input Uncertainty [0.0]
  In real-life applications like engineering design, the designer often wants to take multiple objectives as well as input uncertainty into account. We introduce a novel Bayesian optimization framework to efficiently perform multi-objective optimization considering input uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T17:45:26Z)
• Learning Proximal Operators to Discover Multiple Optima [66.98045013486794]
  We present an end-to-end method to learn the proximal operator across non-family problems. We show that for weakly-ized objectives and under mild conditions, the method converges globally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T05:53:28Z)
• Outlier-Robust Sparse Estimation via Non-Convex Optimization [73.18654719887205]
  We explore the connection between high-dimensional statistics and non-robust optimization in the presence of sparsity constraints. We develop novel and simple optimization formulations for these problems. As a corollary, we obtain that any first-order method that efficiently converges to station yields an efficient algorithm for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T17:38:24Z)
• Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision Processes [79.4957965474334]
  We investigate the problem of best-policy identification in discounted Markov Decision (MDPs) when the learner has access to a generative model. The advantages of state-of-the-art algorithms are discussed and illustrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T15:22:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.