Cross-Cultural Simulation of Citizen Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape Using LLM Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12545v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 10:17:31 GMT
• Title: Cross-Cultural Simulation of Citizen Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape Using LLM Agents
• Abstract summary: We propose an evaluation framework for assessing LLMs' emotional responses to red tape across diverse cultural contexts.<n>Our results show that all models exhibit limited alignment with human emotional responses, with notably weaker performance in Eastern cultures.<n>We introduce bftextRAMO, an interactive interface for simulating citizens' emotional responses to red tape and for collecting human data to improve models.
• Score: 12.801278629727676
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Improving policymaking is a central concern in public administration. Prior human subject studies reveal substantial cross-cultural differences in citizens' emotional responses to red tape during policy implementation. While LLM agents offer opportunities to simulate human-like responses and reduce experimental costs, their ability to generate culturally appropriate emotional responses to red tape remains unverified. To address this gap, we propose an evaluation framework for assessing LLMs' emotional responses to red tape across diverse cultural contexts. As a pilot study, we apply this framework to a single red-tape scenario. Our results show that all models exhibit limited alignment with human emotional responses, with notably weaker performance in Eastern cultures. Cultural prompting strategies prove largely ineffective in improving alignment. We further introduce \textbf{RAMO}, an interactive interface for simulating citizens' emotional responses to red tape and for collecting human data to improve models. The interface is publicly available at https://ramo-chi.ivia.ch.

Related papers

• Expressing Social Emotions: Misalignment Between LLMs and Human Cultural Emotion Norms [4.123547796999231]
  We present a psychologically informed evaluation framework of cross-cultural social emotion expression in LLMs.<n>Using a human study comparing European American and Latin American participants' expression of engaging and disengaging emotions, we evaluate six frontier LLMs.<n>All models express engaging emotions more than disengaging ones, with particularly stark differences observed for the generally well-represented European American persona.<n>Our ablation analyses reveal that these patterns are robust to sampling temperatures, partially sensitive to prompt language, and dependent on the response elicitation format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-18T00:17:34Z)
• PERM: Psychology-grounded Empathetic Reward Modeling for Large Language Models [45.377102925731826]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in human-centric applications, yet they often fail to provide substantive emotional support.<n>We propose Psychology-grounded Empathetic Reward Modeling (PERM) to address this limitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T15:56:55Z)
• FED-PsyAU: Privacy-Preserving Micro-Expression Recognition via Psychological AU Coordination and Dynamic Facial Motion Modeling [14.30453182275959]
  Micro-expressions (MEs) are brief, low-intensity, often localized facial expressions.<n>They could reveal genuine emotions individuals may attempt to conceal, valuable in contexts like criminal interrogation and psychological counseling.<n>ME recognition (MER) faces challenges, such as small sample sizes and subtle features, which hinder efficient modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T06:42:15Z)
• Recognizing Emotion Regulation Strategies from Human Behavior with Large Language Models [44.015651538470856]
  Human emotions are often not expressed directly, but regulated according to internal processes and social display rules. No method to automatically classify different emotion regulation strategies in a cross-user scenario exists. We make use of the recently introduced textscDeep corpus for modeling the social display of the emotion shame. A fine-tuned Llama2-7B model is able to classify the utilized emotion regulation strategy with high accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T12:47:10Z)
• Rel-A.I.: An Interaction-Centered Approach To Measuring Human-LM Reliance [73.19687314438133]
  We study how reliance is affected by contextual features of an interaction. We find that contextual characteristics significantly affect human reliance behavior. Our results show that calibration and language quality alone are insufficient in evaluating the risks of human-LM interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T18:00:05Z)
• EmPO: Emotion Grounding for Empathetic Response Generation through Preference Optimization [9.934277461349696]
  Empathetic response generation is a desirable aspect of conversational agents. We propose a novel approach where we construct theory-driven preference datasets based on emotion grounding. We show that LLMs can be aligned for empathetic response generation by preference optimization while retaining their general performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T10:41:22Z)
• Promoting Constructive Deliberation: Reframing for Receptiveness [5.4346288442609945]
  We propose automatic reframing of disagreeing responses to signal receptiveness to a preceding comment. We identify six strategies for reframing. We automatically reframe replies to comments according to each strategy, using a Reddit dataset. We find that the replies generated with our framework are perceived to be significantly more receptive than the original replies and a generic receptiveness baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T21:35:22Z)
• LLM generated responses to mitigate the impact of hate speech [1.774563970628096]
  This paper outlines the design of our automatic moderation system and proposes a simple metric for measuring user engagement. We discuss the ethical considerations and challenges in deploying generative AI for discourse moderation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T16:08:42Z)
• Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey design [66.1850490474361]
  We investigate the extent to which large language models (LLMs) reflect human response biases, if at all. We design a dataset and framework to evaluate whether LLMs exhibit human-like response biases in survey questionnaires. Our comprehensive evaluation of nine models shows that popular open and commercial LLMs generally fail to reflect human-like behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T15:40:43Z)
• Building Emotional Support Chatbots in the Era of LLMs [64.06811786616471]
  We introduce an innovative methodology that synthesizes human insights with the computational prowess of Large Language Models (LLMs) By utilizing the in-context learning potential of ChatGPT, we generate an ExTensible Emotional Support dialogue dataset, named ExTES. Following this, we deploy advanced tuning techniques on the LLaMA model, examining the impact of diverse training strategies, ultimately yielding an LLM meticulously optimized for emotional support interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T10:49:18Z)
• Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBench [83.41621219298489]
  We evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) anthropomorphic capabilities using the emotion appraisal theory from psychology. We collect a dataset containing over 400 situations that have proven effective in eliciting the eight emotions central to our study. We conduct a human evaluation involving more than 1,200 subjects worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T15:18:30Z)
• MISC: A MIxed Strategy-Aware Model Integrating COMET for Emotional Support Conversation [64.37111498077866]
  We propose a novel model for emotional support conversation. It infers the user's fine-grained emotional status, and then responds skillfully using a mixture of strategy. Experimental results on the benchmark dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T10:32:04Z)
• Counterfactual Off-Policy Training for Neural Response Generation [94.76649147381232]
  We propose to explore potential responses by counterfactual reasoning. Training on the counterfactual responses under the adversarial learning framework helps to explore the high-reward area of the potential response space. An empirical study on the DailyDialog dataset shows that our approach significantly outperforms the HRED model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T22:46:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.