Diagnosable ColBERT: Debugging Late-Interaction Retrieval Models Using a Learned Latent Space as Reference
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19566v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 15:19:03 GMT
- Title: Diagnosable ColBERT: Debugging Late-Interaction Retrieval Models Using a Learned Latent Space as Reference
- Abstract summary: We propose a framework that aligns ColBERT token embeddings to a reference latent space grounded in clinical knowledge.<n>This alignment turns document encodings into inspectable evidence of what the model appears to understand.
- Score: 1.6904475483445454
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reliable biomedical and clinical retrieval requires more than strong ranking performance: it requires a practical way to find systematic model failures and curate the training evidence needed to correct them. Late-interaction models such as ColBERT provide a first solution thanks to the interpretable token-level interaction scores they expose between document and query tokens. Yet this interpretability is shallow: it explains a particular document--query pairwise score, but does not reveal whether the model has learned a clinical concept in a stable, reusable, and context-sensitive way across diverse expressions. As a result, these scores provide limited support for diagnosing misunderstandings, identifying irreasonably distant biomedical concepts, or deciding what additional data or feedback is needed to address this. In this short position paper, we propose Diagnosable ColBERT, a framework that aligns ColBERT token embeddings to a reference latent space grounded in clinical knowledge and expert-provided conceptual similarity constraints. This alignment turns document encodings into inspectable evidence of what the model appears to understand, enabling more direct error diagnosis and more principled data curation without relying on large batteries of diagnostic queries.
Related papers
- Concept-Grounded Reasoning with Prompt-Driven Localization for Interpretable Structured Report Generation [66.62662330558906]
CORAL is a multimodal framework that integrates spatial grounding and concept-level supervision into a unified reasoning process.<n>CORAL employs a prompt-driven medical segmentation model to localize lesions and predicts multi-class clinical attributes through a Concept Bottleneck module.<n>Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T10:21:23Z) - Beyond the Leaderboard: Design Lessons for Trustworthy Multimodal VQA [4.080704298118247]
multimodal AI must combine visual and textual evidence while remaining reliable and interpretable.<n>We analyze design choices across nine documented systems for question answering and explanation quality.<n>The findings support trustworthy multimodal healthcare AI based on data fusion, explainability, and resilient evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-16T17:38:19Z) - Divide-then-Diagnose: Weaving Clinician-Inspired Contexts for Ultra-Long Capsule Endoscopy Videos [83.01543151239254]
We define a new task, diagnosis-driven CE video summarization.<n>VideoCAP is the first CE dataset with diagnosis-driven annotations.<n>DiCE is a clinician-inspired framework that mirrors the standard CE reading workflow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-23T16:07:51Z) - Strong Reasoning Isn't Enough: Evaluating Evidence Elicitation in Interactive Diagnosis [29.630872344186873]
Interactive medical consultation requires an agent to proactively elicit missing clinical evidence under uncertainty.<n>Existing evaluations largely remain static or outcome-centric, neglecting the evidence-gathering process.<n>We propose an interactive evaluation framework that explicitly models the consultation process using a simulated patient and a revsimulated reporter grounded in atomic evidences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-27T16:36:35Z) - AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z) - Few-Shot Multimodal Medical Imaging: A Theoretical Framework [0.0]
We propose a unified theoretical framework that characterizes learning and inference under low-resource medical imaging conditions.<n>We first formalize the learning objective under few-shot conditions and compute sample complexity to estimate the smallest quantity of data needed to achieve clinically reliable accuracy.<n>We then propose a formal metric for explanation stability, offering interpretability guarantees under low-data conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-03T01:21:50Z) - RAD: Towards Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Clinical Diagnosis [56.373297358647655]
Retrieval-Augmented Diagnosis (RAD) is a novel framework that injects external knowledge into multimodal models directly on downstream tasks.<n>RAD operates through three key mechanisms: retrieval and refinement of disease-centered knowledge from multiple medical sources, a guideline-enhanced contrastive loss transformer, and a dual decoder.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T10:36:14Z) - REMEMBER: Retrieval-based Explainable Multimodal Evidence-guided Modeling for Brain Evaluation and Reasoning in Zero- and Few-shot Neurodegenerative Diagnosis [6.446611581074913]
We introduce REMEMBER -- Retrieval-based Explainable Multimodalively-guided Modeling for Brain Evaluation and Reasoning.<n>REMEMBER is a new machine learning framework that facilitates zero- and few-shot Alzheimer's diagnosis using brain MRI scans.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that REMEMBER achieves robust zero- and few-shot performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-12T22:06:15Z) - Uncertainty-aware Medical Diagnostic Phrase Identification and Grounding [72.18719355481052]
We introduce a novel task called Medical Report Grounding (MRG)<n>MRG aims to directly identify diagnostic phrases and their corresponding grounding boxes from medical reports in an end-to-end manner.<n>We propose uMedGround, a robust and reliable framework that leverages a multimodal large language model to predict diagnostic phrases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T07:41:35Z) - Interpretable Vertebral Fracture Diagnosis [69.68641439851777]
Black-box neural network models learn clinically relevant features for fracture diagnosis.
This work identifies the concepts networks use for vertebral fracture diagnosis in CT images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-30T13:07:41Z) - Semi-supervised Medical Image Classification with Relation-driven
Self-ensembling Model [71.80319052891817]
We present a relation-driven semi-supervised framework for medical image classification.
It exploits the unlabeled data by encouraging the prediction consistency of given input under perturbations.
Our method outperforms many state-of-the-art semi-supervised learning methods on both single-label and multi-label image classification scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-15T06:57:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.