What If We Work Together? Fostering Reflections on Designer Inclusion in Open Source Software Through Speculative Design

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24981v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 20:37:55 GMT
• Title: What If We Work Together? Fostering Reflections on Designer Inclusion in Open Source Software Through Speculative Design
• Abstract summary: Open source software (OSS) often prioritizes technical functionality over usability and UX design.<n>This imbalance limits OSS adoption among broader, non-technical users.<n>We explore the potential of speculative design as a catalyst for transforming the OSS community's mindset.
• Score: 11.960431631791812
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Open source software (OSS) often prioritizes technical functionality over usability and UX design. This imbalance limits OSS adoption among broader, non-technical users. Key underlying factors contributing to this issue are the shortage of design expertise in OSS and a dominant developer-centric mindset. To address these persistent issues, we explore the potential of speculative design as a catalyst for transforming the OSS community's mindset towards a more designer-inclusive environment. Our design was informed by an analysis of online forums, which revealed designers' motivations and challenges when contributing to OSS. Guided by these insights, we created two speculative societies, Husia (collectivist) and Reetar (individualist), in which designers are valued for different reasons and their work incorporated in different ways. Through a user study with 12 OSS practitioners (seven designers and five developers), we found that our speculative societies provoked participants' rich and critical reflections on OSS values, the root causes of challenges, and proposed actions. Our work provides insights into how speculative design can be used in the practical, sociotechnical context of OSS to stimulate critical reflection, improve awareness, and yield recommendations for fostering an equitable, sustainable, and inclusive OSS environment.

Related papers

• What Motivates Whom? A Survey of Newcomers to OSS and Experienced OSS Practitioners [7.504007895842893]
  Open source software (OSS) development continues to expand, yet software practitioners often struggle to select suitable projects.<n>This study investigates contributors' project-selection preferences in OSS projects.<n>We find that demographic factors, such as age, gender, and the OSS role they held, significantly correlate with their motivations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T22:40:29Z)
• Charting Uncertain Waters: A Socio-Technical Framework for Navigating GenAI's Impact on Open Source Communities [53.812795099349295]
  We conduct a scenario-driven, conceptual exploration using a socio-technical framework inspired by McLuhan's Tetrad to surface both risks and opportunities for community resilience amid GenAI-driven disruption of OSS development across four domains: software practices, documentation, community engagement, and governance.<n>By adopting this lens, OSS leaders and researchers can proactively shape the future of their ecosystems, rather than simply reacting to technological upheaval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T22:54:15Z)
• Recommending With, Not For: Co-Designing Recommender Systems for Social Good [46.03400472698948]
  We argue that recommender systems aimed at improving social good should be designed *by* and *with*, not just *for* the people who will experience their benefits and harms.<n> recommender systems should be designed in collaboration with their users, creators, and other stakeholders as full co-designers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:50:39Z)
• Ethical Classification of Non-Coding Contributions in Open-Source Projects via Large Language Models [0.3222802562733786]
  We propose an approach to classify the ethical quality of non-coding contributions in OSS projects by relying on Large Language Models (LLM)<n>We defined a set of ethical metrics based on the Contributor Covenant and developed a classification approach to assess ethical behavior in OSS non-coding contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T08:34:46Z)
• "Ohhh, He's the Boss!": Unpacking Power Dynamics Among Developers, Designers, and End-Users in FLOSS Usability [15.427821536893108]
  We explore how power of different FLOSS stakeholders manifests and can be mediated during collaboration.<n>We conducted eight design workshops with different combinations of key FLOSS stakeholders.<n>Our results contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the power dynamics among FLOSS stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T23:52:03Z)
• Untold Stories: Unveiling the Scarce Contributions of UX Professionals to Usability Issue Discussions of Open Source Software Projects [11.767394881100223]
  This study identifies UX professionals' distinct approaches to raising and following up on usability issues.<n>Compared to other contributors, UX professionals addressed a broader range of usability issues, well-supported their stances, and were more factual than emotional.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T15:45:13Z)
• CROSS: A Contributor-Project Interaction Lifecycle Model for Open Source Software [2.9631016562930546]
  Cross model is a novel contributor-project interaction lifecycle model for open source software. It explains a range of archetypal cases of contributor engagement and highlights research gaps, especially in EoS/offboarding scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T17:57:12Z)
• On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models [93.67389739906561]
  We focus on open foundation models, defined here as those with broadly available model weights. We identify five distinctive properties of open foundation models that lead to both their benefits and risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T16:49:53Z)
• Design Space Exploration and Explanation via Conditional Variational Autoencoders in Meta-model-based Conceptual Design of Pedestrian Bridges [52.77024349608834]
  This paper provides a performance-driven design exploration framework to augment the human designer through a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) The CVAE is trained on 18'000 synthetically generated instances of a pedestrian bridge in Switzerland.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T17:28:31Z)
• Investigating Positive and Negative Qualities of Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Designing Interaction Techniques [55.492211642128446]
  Designers reportedly struggle with design optimization tasks where they are asked to find a combination of design parameters that maximizes a given set of objectives. Model-based computational design algorithms assist designers by generating design examples during design. Black box methods for assistance, on the other hand, can work with any design problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T20:40:43Z)
• Deconfounded Causal Collaborative Filtering [56.41625001876272]
  Recommender systems may be confounded by various types of confounding factors (also called confounders) We propose Deconfounded Causal Collaborative Filtering (DCCF) to solve the problem. Our method is able to deconfound unobserved confounders to achieve better recommendation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T02:23:33Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Flexibility Design Problems [77.37213643948108]
  We develop a reinforcement learning framework for flexibility design problems. Empirical results show that the RL-based method consistently finds better solutions than classical methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:44:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.