Closed form logical error rate approximations for surface codes
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03054v1
- Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 18:18:18 GMT
- Title: Closed form logical error rate approximations for surface codes
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel method to calculate logical error rates in surface codes, assuming independent and identically distributed physical errors.<n>We show how to use our method to analyze hypothetical quantum computers with various configurations and select designs with lower error rates.
- Score: 0.5599792629509229
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We propose a novel method to calculate logical error rates in surface codes, assuming independent and identically distributed physical errors. We show how to use our method to analyze hypothetical quantum computers with various configurations and select designs with lower error rates. Currently, this requires expensive classical simulations of quantum decoders for various distances and physical error rates or inaccurate extrapolation from minimal experimental data. Instead, we use the symmetry of the problem to count the configurations that result in a logical error with our novel software. Given a physical error rate, we can deduce the probability of a logical error, to provably good accuracy. We include an analysis of measurement errors to allow a more complete comparison of different surface code implementations.
Related papers
- Experimentally Informed Decoding of Stabilizer Codes Based on Syndrome Correlations [33.24167463060077]
We present an experimental approach guided by a novel analytical formula to characterize the probability of independent errors.<n>We use the method to find the optimal weights for a minimum-weight perfect matching decoder without relying on a theoretical error model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-24T23:27:42Z) - Using Detector Likelihood for Benchmarking Quantum Error Correction [0.0]
The behavior of real quantum hardware differs strongly from the simple error models typically used when simulating quantum error correction.
We show that this can be done by means of the average detector likelihood, which quantifies the rate at which error detection events occur.
This is then used to define an effective error rate at which simulations for a simple uniform noise model result in the same average detector likelihood, as well as a good prediction of the logical error rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-04T16:34:38Z) - Low-Overhead Transversal Fault Tolerance for Universal Quantum Computation [36.3664581543528]
We show that logical operations can be performed fault-tolerantly with only a constant number of extraction rounds.<n>Our work sheds new light on the theory of quantum fault tolerance and has the potential to reduce the space-time cost of practical fault-tolerant quantum computation by over an order of magnitude.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T15:43:25Z) - Subsystem surface and compass code sensitivities to non-identical
infidelity distributions on heavy-hex lattice [0.0]
We investigate how the logical error rate depends on parameters of the noise distribution for the subsystem surface code and the compass code.
The average logical error rate depends on the average of the physical qubit infidelity distribution without sensitivity to higher moments.
A decoder that is aware of location specific error rates modestly improves the logical error rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T04:05:50Z) - Coherent errors and readout errors in the surface code [0.0]
We consider the combined effect of readout errors and coherent errors on the surface code.
We find a threshold for this combination of errors, with an error rate close to the threshold of the corresponding incoherent error channel.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-08T15:50:44Z) - Witnessing entanglement in trapped-ion quantum error correction under
realistic noise [41.94295877935867]
Quantum Error Correction (QEC) exploits redundancy by encoding logical information into multiple physical qubits.
We present a detailed microscopic error model to estimate the average gate infidelity of two-qubit light-shift gates used in trapped-ion platforms.
We then apply this realistic error model to quantify the multipartite entanglement generated by circuits that act as QEC building blocks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-14T20:00:36Z) - Validation tests of GBS quantum computers give evidence for quantum
advantage with a decoherent target [62.997667081978825]
We use positive-P phase-space simulations of grouped count probabilities as a fingerprint for verifying multi-mode data.
We show how one can disprove faked data, and apply this to a classical count algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-07T12:00:45Z) - A Quantum Algorithm for Computing All Diagnoses of a Switching Circuit [73.70667578066775]
Faults are by nature while most man-made systems, and especially computers, work deterministically.
This paper provides such a connecting via quantum information theory which is an intuitive approach as quantum physics obeys probability laws.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-08T17:55:30Z) - Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit [147.2624260358795]
We report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across multiple code sizes.
Our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number.
Results mark the first experimental demonstration where quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-13T18:00:02Z) - Fast and Accurate Error Simulation for CNNs against Soft Errors [64.54260986994163]
We present a framework for the reliability analysis of Conal Neural Networks (CNNs) via an error simulation engine.
These error models are defined based on the corruption patterns of the output of the CNN operators induced by faults.
We show that our methodology achieves about 99% accuracy of the fault effects w.r.t. SASSIFI, and a speedup ranging from 44x up to 63x w.r.t.FI, that only implements a limited set of error models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-04T19:45:02Z) - Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and
Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application.
We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor.
This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z) - Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive
error correction [56.362599585843085]
State-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near $10-3$.
Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits.
We implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-11T17:11:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.