Agentic Performance at the Edge: Insights from Benchmarking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10384v1
• Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 11:24:20 GMT
• Title: Agentic Performance at the Edge: Insights from Benchmarking
• Abstract summary: We study how much agentic-task quality is lost when model size is constrained by memory, power, and latency budgets.<n>Our core finding is that edge-agent quality is not a simple function of parameter count. Robust deployment depends on the joint design of model choice and tool workflow.
• Score: 13.571477369653143
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) is a natural fit for Internet of Things (IoT) and edge systems, but edge deployments are often constrained to models around 8 billion parameters or smaller. An important question is: How much agentic-task quality is lost when model size is constrained by memory, power, and latency budgets? To address this question, in this paper, we provide an initial empirical study considering edge-focused model scaling, general-purpose versus coder-oriented model effects, and tool-enabled execution under a fixed protocol. We introduce a domain-conditioned evaluation methodology, an implementation-grounded analysis of model-tool interactions, practical guidance for model selection under constraints, and an analysis of failure modes that reveals distinct semantic versus execution failure patterns across model families. Our core finding is that edge-agent quality is not a simple function of parameter count. Robust deployment depends on the joint design of model choice and tool workflow. Domain-conditioned analysis reveals Pareto fronts in the accuracy-latency space that can guide strategy selection based on operational priorities.

Related papers

• CIPHER: A Decoupled Exploration-Selection Framework for Test-Time Scaling of Data Science Agents [1.4057557845067372]
  CIPHER is an automated data science agent that leverages test-time scaling through the generation and selection of multiple initial states for concurrent execution.<n>We demonstrate that CIPHER exceeds state-of-the-art performance in matched-model comparisons.<n>Our empirical study characterizes the design space of the Decoupled Exploration-Selection framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T22:01:21Z)
• Model Merging in the Essential Subspace [78.5390284258307]
  Model merging aims to integrate multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single multi-task model without additional training.<n>Despite extensive research, task interference remains a major obstacle that often undermines the performance of merged models.<n>We propose ESM (Essential Subspace Merging), a robust framework for effective model merging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T00:33:38Z)
• Model Specific Task Similarity for Vision Language Model Selection via Layer Conductance [92.72779885657373]
  We propose a framework that grounds model selection in the internal functional dynamics of the visual encoder.<n>Our approach represents each task via layer wise conductance and derives a target-conditioned block importance distribution through entropy regularized alignment.<n>Building on this, we introduce Directional Conductance Divergence (DCD), an asymmetric metric that quantifies how effectively a source task covers the target's salient functional blocks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T17:29:43Z)
• Model Correlation Detection via Random Selection Probing [62.093777777813756]
  Existing similarity-based methods require access to model parameters or produce scores without thresholds.<n>We introduce Random Selection Probing (RSP), a hypothesis-testing framework that formulates model correlation detection as a statistical test.<n>RSP produces rigorous p-values that quantify evidence of correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T01:40:26Z)
• Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
  We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
• Task-Oriented Real-time Visual Inference for IoVT Systems: A Co-design Framework of Neural Networks and Edge Deployment [61.20689382879937]
  Task-oriented edge computing addresses this by shifting data analysis to the edge. Existing methods struggle to balance high model performance with low resource consumption. We propose a novel co-design framework to optimize neural network architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T19:02:54Z)
• Exploring Cross-model Neuronal Correlations in the Context of Predicting Model Performance and Generalizability [2.6708879445664584]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for assessing a newly trained model's performance based on another known model.<n>The proposed method evaluates correlations by determining if, for each neuron in one network, there exists a neuron in the other network that produces similar output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T22:57:39Z)
• Characterizing Disparity Between Edge Models and High-Accuracy Base Models for Vision Tasks [5.081175754775484]
  We introduce XDELTA, a novel explainable AI tool that explains differences between a high-accuracy base model and a computationally efficient but lower-accuracy edge model. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation to test XDELTA's ability to explain model discrepancies, using over 1.2 million images and 24 models, and assessing real-world deployments with six participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-13T22:05:58Z)
• Understanding the (Extra-)Ordinary: Validating Deep Model Decisions with Prototypical Concept-based Explanations [13.60538902487872]
  We present a novel post-hoc concept-based XAI framework that conveys besides instance-wise (local) also class-wise (global) decision-making strategies via prototypes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in identifying out-of-distribution samples, spurious model behavior and data quality issues across three datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T10:53:26Z)
• Switchable Representation Learning Framework with Self-compatibility [50.48336074436792]
  We propose a Switchable representation learning Framework with Self-Compatibility (SFSC) SFSC generates a series of compatible sub-models with different capacities through one training process. SFSC achieves state-of-the-art performance on the evaluated datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T16:46:32Z)
• Differential Assessment of Black-Box AI Agents [29.98710357871698]
  We propose a novel approach to differentially assess black-box AI agents that have drifted from their previously known models. We leverage sparse observations of the drifted agent's current behavior and knowledge of its initial model to generate an active querying policy. Empirical evaluation shows that our approach is much more efficient than re-learning the agent model from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-24T17:48:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.