Adaptive Conformal Prediction for Reliable and Explainable Medical Image Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12917v1
• Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 02:45:07 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Conformal Prediction for Reliable and Explainable Medical Image Classification
• Abstract summary: We propose an Adaptive Lambda Criterion for RAPS that minimizes the worst-case coverage violation across prediction set size strata.<n>Our method achieves 95.72 percent global coverage with average set size 1.09 and at least 90 percent coverage across all strata.
• Score: 3.466510324781552
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep learning models for medical imaging often exhibit overconfidence, creating safety risks in ambiguous diagnostic scenarios. While Conformal Prediction (CP) provides distribution-free statistical guarantees, standard methods such as Regularized Adaptive Prediction Sets (RAPS) optimize for average efficiency and can mask severe failures on difficult inputs. We propose an Adaptive Lambda Criterion for RAPS that minimizes the worst-case coverage violation across prediction set size strata. On OrganAMNIST (58,850 abdominal CT images, 11 classes), standard size-optimized RAPS converges to near-deterministic behavior with stratified undercoverage on uncertain samples, while our method achieves 95.72 percent global coverage with average set size 1.09 and at least 90 percent coverage across all strata. Cross-domain validation on PathMNIST (107,180 pathology images, 9 classes) confirms generalizability. Quantitative Grad-CAM analysis (rho = -0.30, p < 1e-22) shows that multi-label predictions correspond to focused attention on anatomically ambiguous regions. These results demonstrate that the proposed method improves reliability while maintaining efficiency, making it suitable for safety-critical medical AI applications.

Related papers

• Making Conformal Predictors Robust in Healthcare Settings: a Case Study on EEG Classification [13.423110268586287]
  Quantifying uncertainty in clinical predictions is critical for high-stakes diagnosis tasks.<n>We evaluate several conformal prediction approaches on EEG seizure classification.<n>We demonstrate that personalized calibration strategies can improve coverage by over 20 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T03:59:32Z)
• LATA: Laplacian-Assisted Transductive Adaptation for Conformal Uncertainty in Medical VLMs [61.06744611795341]
  Medical vision-language models (VLMs) are strong zero-shot recognizers for medical imaging.<n>We propose texttttextbfLATA (Laplacian-Assisted Transductive Adaptation), a textittraining- and label-free refinement.<n>texttttextbfLATA sharpens zero-shot predictions without compromising exchangeability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T16:45:38Z)
• Anatomically-aware conformal prediction for medical image segmentation with random walks [8.829058131683764]
  Conformal prediction (CP) is a powerful distribution-free framework for constructing statistically valid prediction intervals.<n>This paper proposes Random-Walk Conformal Prediction (RW-CP), a model-agnostic framework which can be added on top of any segmentation method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T22:16:07Z)
• Adaptive Conformal Prediction via Bayesian Uncertainty Weighting for Hierarchical Healthcare Data [2.922743999325622]
  We present a hybrid Bayesian-conformal framework that addresses the fundamental limitation in healthcare predictions.<n>Our approach integrates Bayesian hierarchical random forests with group-aware conformal calibration, using posterior uncertainties to weight conformity scores.<n>We evaluate our method on 61,538 admissions across 3,793 U.S. hospitals and 4 regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-03T16:06:37Z)
• Conditional Coverage Diagnostics for Conformal Prediction [47.93989136542648]
  We show that conditional coverage estimation can be a classification problem.<n>We call the resulting family of metrics excess risk of the target coverage (ERT)<n>We release an open-source package for ERT as well as previous conditional coverage metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T18:47:39Z)
• Noise-Adaptive Conformal Classification with Marginal Coverage [53.74125453366155]
  We introduce an adaptive conformal inference method capable of efficiently handling deviations from exchangeability caused by random label noise.<n>We validate our method through extensive numerical experiments demonstrating its effectiveness on synthetic and real data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T23:55:23Z)
• Conformal Prediction Sets with Improved Conditional Coverage using Trust Scores [52.92618442300405]
  It is impossible to achieve exact, distribution-free conditional coverage in finite samples.<n>We propose an alternative conformal prediction algorithm that targets coverage where it matters most.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T12:01:56Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
  Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z)
• Improving Trustworthiness of AI Disease Severity Rating in Medical Imaging with Ordinal Conformal Prediction Sets [0.7734726150561088]
  A lack of statistically rigorous uncertainty quantification is a significant factor undermining trust in AI results. Recent developments in distribution-free uncertainty quantification present practical solutions for these issues. We demonstrate a technique for forming ordinal prediction sets that are guaranteed to contain the correct stenosis severity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T18:01:20Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.