Are free choices absolute, when internalized in Wigner's friend?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14538v1
• Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 08:21:35 GMT
• Title: Are free choices absolute, when internalized in Wigner's friend?
• Abstract summary: Wigner's thought experiment illustrates quantum theory's measurement problem.<n>We present an argument against the absoluteness of free choices under the same notion of locality.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Wigner's thought experiment illustrates quantum theory's measurement problem by considering an observer who measures a quantum system inside a sealed lab, modeled unitarily by an outsider. Recent extensions of this thought experiment, referred to as extended Wigner's friend arguments, question how different observers can reason consistently about each other in quantum setups, and challenge the absoluteness of the outcome value obtained by the friend under a notion of locality. In this work, we present an argument against the absoluteness of free choices under the same notion of locality, using an extended Wigner's friend scenario based on the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph theorem. Similar arguments based on other contextuality or nonlocality models are possible.

Related papers

• Intelligent qubits [51.56484100374058]
  We introduce the method of intelligent qubits'' which replace live observers in Wigner's friend and Frauchiger--Renner thought experiments.<n>The fallacy traces back to London and Bauer's attempt (1939) to legitimize a self-referential interpretation of observers' introspection''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-21T21:49:09Z)
• Experiment to test the incompleteness of quantum mechanics [45.88028371034407]
  We propose an experiment to test the incompleteness of the standard quantum formalism.<n>We show with simulations that the transmission densities in the standard interpretation and in the double solution interpretation give very different results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T08:02:14Z)
• Einstein's 1927 gedanken experiment: how to complete it and measure the collapse time of a spatially spread photon [55.2480439325792]
  Einstein discussed a gedanken experiment involving a single photon diffracted at an aperture and impinging on a screen.<n>He devised the example to support De Broglie's hypothesis of the pilot wave, and his own ideas on the incompleteness of the description of physical reality provided by Quantum Mechanics.<n> Partial realizations of Einstein's example have been performed, but the complete experiment has not been attempted (for good practical reasons) yet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T18:10:12Z)
• Proposal of an optical Bell's experiment to test the boundary between determinism and indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics [41.94295877935867]
  It was recently noted the existence of an apparently discontinuous boundary between determinism and indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics. We propose to explore this boundary by recording the distribution of outcomes of a given parity interrupted by outcomes of the other parity. The features of these distributions for small rotations of the angle settings near critical points may indicate whether the underlying process is in-deterministic or not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T14:48:08Z)
• On the significance of Wigner's Friend in contexts beyond quantum foundations [0.0]
  Wigner's Friend highlights a counterintuitive feature that is unique to quantum theory.<n>We argue that the gist of the Wigner's Friend paradox can be reproduced without assuming quantum physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:00:13Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• The original Wigner's friend paradox within a realist toy model [0.0]
  The original Wigner's friend paradox highlights the tension between unitary evolution and collapse in quantum theory. We present a classical toy model in which the contradicting predictions at the heart of the thought experiment are reproduced. The debate surrounding the original Wigner's friend thought experiment and its resolution have striking similarities with arguments concerning the nature of the second law of thermodynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-26T19:03:32Z)
• Wigner's friend and the quasi-ideal clock [0.0]
  In 1962, Eugene P. Wigner introduced a thought experiment that highlighted the incompatibility in quantum theory between unitary evolution and wave function reduction in a measurement. A class of thought experiments often called Wigner's Friend Scenarios have been providing insights over many frameworks and interpretations of quantum theory. Recently, a no-go theorem brought attention back to the Wigner's Friend and its potential of putting theories to test.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T23:29:15Z)
• Quantum erasing the memory of Wigner's friend [0.0]
  Wigner's friend paradox concerns one of the most puzzling problems of quantum mechanics. At the core of the paradox lies the description of an observer and the object it measures as a closed system obeying the Schr"odinger equation. We argue that the three apparently incompatible properties used to question the consistency of quantum mechanics correspond to two logically distinct contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T14:24:58Z)
• A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox [0.0]
  We prove that if quantum evolution is controllable on the scale of an observer, then one of 'No-Superdeterminism', 'Locality' or 'Absoluteness of Observed Events' must be false. We show that although the violation of Bell-type inequalities in such scenarios is not in general sufficient to demonstrate the contradiction between those three assumptions, new inequalities can be derived in a theory-independent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-12T08:09:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.