WhoSaidIt: Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation for Text-Based Multilingual Speaker-Attribute Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26070v1
• Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 17:37:45 GMT
• Title: WhoSaidIt: Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation for Text-Based Multilingual Speaker-Attribute Classification
• Abstract summary: We propose a human-large language model (LLM) collaborative re-annotation framework for stabilizing multilingual speaker-attribute labels.<n>Using this framework, we construct WhoSaidIt, a multilingual dataset covering nine speaker-attribute labels.
• Score: 2.634639188510826
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Annotating speaker attributes from text is inherently ambiguous, particularly in multilingual settings where demographic and social cues are implicit and culturally variable. We propose a human-large language model (LLM) collaborative re-annotation framework for stabilizing multilingual speaker-attribute labels under practical resource constraints. Starting from a noisy corpus, we use LLMs to surface recurring annotation rationales through iterative interaction with experts, and apply disagreement-focused sampling for targeted re-annotation. Using this framework, we construct WhoSaidIt, a multilingual dataset covering nine speaker-attribute labels. We quantify divergence between original and revised annotations, benchmark recent LLMs, and analyze the effect of explicit rationales on model behavior. Our results reveal substantial cross-lingual differences in annotation decisions and demonstrate both the strengths and limitations of LLMs in speaker-attribute classification.

Related papers

• COALA: Robust Contextualized Speech-augmented Language Modeling for ASR via Contrastive Regularizer and Biasing Score Estimation [16.40789238594682]
  COALA is a framework designed to enhance speech-augmented language models (SLMs) in complex multi-entity scenarios.<n>We show that COALA consistently achieves superior contextual biasing performance across various biasing list scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-09T05:26:22Z)
• LLM Probe: Evaluating LLMs for Low-Resource Languages [6.177998679139308]
  This paper presents a lexicon-based assessment framework designed to evaluate the linguistic skills of large language models (LLMs) in low-resource languages.<n>The framework analyzes models across four areas of language understanding: lexical alignment, part-of-speech recognition, morphosyntactic probing, and translation accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T10:03:38Z)
• Comparing LLM Text Annotation Skills: A Study on Human Rights Violations in Social Media Data [2.812898346527047]
  This study investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) for zero-shot and few-shot annotation of social media posts in Russian and Ukrainian.<n>To evaluate the effectiveness of these models, their annotations are compared against a gold standard set of human double-annotated labels.<n>The study explores the unique patterns of errors and disagreements exhibited by each model, offering insights into their strengths, limitations, and cross-linguistic adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T13:10:47Z)
• High-Dimensional Interlingual Representations of Large Language Models [65.77317753001954]
  Large language models (LLMs) trained on massive multilingual datasets hint at the formation of interlingual constructs.<n>We explore 31 diverse languages varying on their resource-levels, typologies, and geographical regions.<n>We find that multilingual LLMs exhibit inconsistent cross-lingual alignments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T10:39:27Z)
• Mitigating Biases to Embrace Diversity: A Comprehensive Annotation Benchmark for Toxic Language [0.0]
  This study introduces a prescriptive annotation benchmark grounded in humanities research to ensure consistent, unbiased labeling of offensive language. We contribute two newly annotated datasets that achieve higher inter-annotator agreement between human and language model (LLM) annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T08:10:24Z)
• Evaluating Contextualized Representations of (Spanish) Ambiguous Words: A New Lexical Resource and Empirical Analysis [2.2530496464901106]
  We evaluate semantic representations of Spanish ambiguous nouns in context in a suite of Spanish-language monolingual and multilingual BERT-based models.<n>We find that various BERT-based LMs' contextualized semantic representations capture some variance in human judgments but fall short of the human benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T18:58:11Z)
• Decomposed Prompting: Probing Multilingual Linguistic Structure Knowledge in Large Language Models [54.58989938395976]
  We introduce a decomposed prompting approach for sequence labeling tasks.<n>We test our method on the Universal Dependencies part-of-speech tagging dataset for 38 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T15:15:39Z)
• Paralinguistics-Enhanced Large Language Modeling of Spoken Dialogue [71.15186328127409]
  Paralinguistics-enhanced Generative Pretrained Transformer (ParalinGPT) Model takes the conversational context of text, speech embeddings, and paralinguistic attributes as input prompts within a serialized multitasking framework. We utilize the Switchboard-1 corpus, including its sentiment labels as the paralinguistic attribute, as our spoken dialogue dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-23T18:14:56Z)
• Using Natural Language Explanations to Rescale Human Judgments [81.66697572357477]
  We propose a method to rescale ordinal annotations and explanations using large language models (LLMs)<n>We feed annotators' Likert ratings and corresponding explanations into an LLM and prompt it to produce a numeric score anchored in a scoring rubric.<n>Our method rescales the raw judgments without impacting agreement and brings the scores closer to human judgments grounded in the same scoring rubric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:19:14Z)
• Multilingual Word Sense Disambiguation with Unified Sense Representation [55.3061179361177]
  We propose building knowledge and supervised-based Multilingual Word Sense Disambiguation (MWSD) systems. We build unified sense representations for multiple languages and address the annotation scarcity problem for MWSD by transferring annotations from rich-sourced languages to poorer ones. Evaluations of SemEval-13 and SemEval-15 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T01:24:03Z)
• A Multi-level Supervised Contrastive Learning Framework for Low-Resource Natural Language Inference [54.678516076366506]
  Natural Language Inference (NLI) is a growingly essential task in natural language understanding. Here we propose a multi-level supervised contrastive learning framework named MultiSCL for low-resource natural language inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T05:54:18Z)
• AM2iCo: Evaluating Word Meaning in Context across Low-ResourceLanguages with Adversarial Examples [51.048234591165155]
  We present AM2iCo, Adversarial and Multilingual Meaning in Context. It aims to faithfully assess the ability of state-of-the-art (SotA) representation models to understand the identity of word meaning in cross-lingual contexts. Results reveal that current SotA pretrained encoders substantially lag behind human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T20:23:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.