Academic Integrity and Emotional Responses to Inappropriate LLM Use in Software Engineering Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07830v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 20:37:22 GMT
• Title: Academic Integrity and Emotional Responses to Inappropriate LLM Use in Software Engineering Education
• Abstract summary: This study investigates how software engineering students describe their emotional experiences after using large language models (LLMs)<n>Indifference was most frequent, including among students who recognized risks to learning and academic standing.<n> Guilt and anxiety were reported in relation to moral discomfort and concern about penalties.
• Score: 2.760934097724228
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Academic integrity in higher education is increasingly shaped by complex socio-technical environments marked by automated tools, evolving institutional practices, and heightened performance pressures. Within this context, large language models (LLMs) are becoming prevalent in software engineering education, further blurring boundaries around acceptable assistance and authorship. This study investigates how software engineering students describe their emotional experiences after using LLMs in ways they perceive as academically inappropriate. We conducted a cross-sectional survey with 116 undergraduate students. Results show emotionally heterogeneous responses. Indifference was most frequent, including among students who recognized risks to learning and academic standing. Guilt and anxiety were reported in relation to moral discomfort and concern about penalties. Relief and satisfaction were evident primarily in deadline-driven contexts and situations of unclear guidance.

Related papers

• Using AI in engineering education: a balancing act, driven by clear purpose [1.0152838128195467]
  Students primarily value LLMs for writing support, conceptual clarification, coding assistance, and brainstorming.<n>Students' attachment to the promises of efficiency and personalized support reflects a form of "cruel optimism"<n>Overall, the chapter argues for a purpose-driven and context-sensitive approach to AI integration in engineering education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T12:21:42Z)
• Same Rules, Mixed Messages: Exploring Community Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in Computing Education [0.0]
  Academic dishonesty has long been a concern in computing education.<n>This study examined how different actors in the computer science classroom interpret potential cheating scenarios.<n>Instructors most often attribute cheating to grade pressure and laziness, while students and TAs emphasize gaps in prerequisite knowledge and time management challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T14:02:44Z)
• LLM Use, Cheating, and Academic Integrity in Software Engineering Education [2.6055991635575446]
  Cheating in university education is commonly described as context dependent and influenced by assessment design, institutional norms, and student interpretation.<n>This study investigates how software engineering students describe experiences of using large language models (LLMs) in ways they perceived as inappropriate, disallowed, or misaligned with course expectations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T18:48:33Z)
• Empathy in Software Engineering Education: Evidence, Practices, and Opportunities [2.198430261120653]
  This study investigates how empathy has been used, taught, and discussed in software engineering education.<n>We conducted a comprehensive search across six databases and analyzed 43 primary studies published between 2001 and 2025.<n>Our findings show that engineering programs frame empathy as an ethical and reflective capacity linked to social responsibility, whereas software engineering translates empathy into structured, design-oriented, and measurable practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-08T02:32:26Z)
• Ethics of Care for Software Engineering [51.80521257060489]
  We argue that the opposition of "caring about" and "caring for" is based on the ethics of care.<n>We advocate for the adoption of ethics of care in software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T20:16:00Z)
• Can Large Language Models Help Students Prove Software Correctness? An Experimental Study with Dafny [75.55915044740566]
  Students in computing education increasingly use large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT.<n>This paper investigates how students interact with an LLM when solving formal verification exercises in Dafny.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T16:34:13Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models for Real-World Engineering Tasks [75.97299249823972]
  This paper introduces a curated database comprising over 100 questions derived from authentic, production-oriented engineering scenarios.<n>Using this dataset, we evaluate four state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our results show that LLMs demonstrate strengths in basic temporal and structural reasoning but struggle significantly with abstract reasoning, formal modeling, and context-sensitive engineering logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T14:05:23Z)
• Emotional Strain and Frustration in LLM Interactions in Software Engineering [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into various daily tasks in Software Engineering.<n>Frustration can negatively impact engineers' productivity and well-being if they escalate into stress and burnout.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T09:55:47Z)
• EmoBench: Evaluating the Emotional Intelligence of Large Language Models [73.60839120040887]
  EmoBench is a benchmark that draws upon established psychological theories and proposes a comprehensive definition for machine Emotional Intelligence (EI) EmoBench includes a set of 400 hand-crafted questions in English and Chinese, which are meticulously designed to require thorough reasoning and understanding. Our findings reveal a considerable gap between the EI of existing Large Language Models and the average human, highlighting a promising direction for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T11:48:09Z)
• Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBench [83.41621219298489]
  We evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) anthropomorphic capabilities using the emotion appraisal theory from psychology. We collect a dataset containing over 400 situations that have proven effective in eliciting the eight emotions central to our study. We conduct a human evaluation involving more than 1,200 subjects worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T15:18:30Z)
• Large Language Models Understand and Can be Enhanced by Emotional Stimuli [53.53886609012119]
  We take the first step towards exploring the ability of Large Language Models to understand emotional stimuli. Our experiments show that LLMs have a grasp of emotional intelligence, and their performance can be improved with emotional prompts. Our human study results demonstrate that EmotionPrompt significantly boosts the performance of generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T00:57:12Z)
• Disadvantaged students increase their academic performance through collective intelligence exposure in emergency remote learning due to COVID 19 [105.54048699217668]
  During the COVID-19 crisis, educational institutions worldwide shifted from face-to-face instruction to emergency remote teaching (ERT) modalities. We analyzed data on 7,528 undergraduate students and found that cooperative and consensus dynamics among students in discussion forums positively affect their final GPA. Using natural language processing, we show that first-year students with low academic performance during high school are exposed to more content-intensive posts in discussion forums.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T20:23:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.