Using AI in engineering education: a balancing act, driven by clear purpose

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16626v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 12:21:42 GMT
• Title: Using AI in engineering education: a balancing act, driven by clear purpose
• Abstract summary: Students primarily value LLMs for writing support, conceptual clarification, coding assistance, and brainstorming.<n>Students' attachment to the promises of efficiency and personalized support reflects a form of "cruel optimism"<n>Overall, the chapter argues for a purpose-driven and context-sensitive approach to AI integration in engineering education.
• Score: 1.0152838128195467
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Based on a questionnaire of 100 higher-education students, predominantly from engineering-related fields, and a critical review of recent literature, this chapter examines how students use and perceive Large Language Models (LLMs) in engineering education. Students primarily value LLMs for writing support, conceptual clarification, coding assistance, and brainstorming, while simultaneously expressing concerns about inaccuracies, bias, overreliance, academic integrity, and the burden of verification. Through an analysis of two dominant metaphors, namely LLMs as an "oracle" and as a "tutor," the chapter shows how these systems cultivate expectations of authority, expertise, and personalized learning that often exceed their actual capabilities. The chapter further argues that students' attachment to the promises of efficiency and personalized support reflects a form of "cruel optimism," where the perceived benefits of LLMs often depend on the very skills, vigilance, and expertise that students are still developing. Overall, the chapter argues for a purpose-driven and context-sensitive approach to AI integration in engineering education, emphasizing critical AI literacy, reflective assessment design, pedagogical caution, and consideration of broader ethical and environmental impacts.

Related papers

• Interpretable Difficulty-Aware Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues [46.915280360954576]
  We propose an interpretable difficulty-aware conversational KT framework built upon large language models (LLMs)<n>The framework incorporates the original textual question and the next tutor-posed task to estimate the student's knowledge state and the difficulty of the upcoming turn.<n>We evaluate the framework on two tutor-student dialogue datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T21:07:24Z)
• Detecting AI-Generated Essays in Writing Assessment: Responsible Use and Generalizability Across LLMs [0.0]
  Writing assessment plays a vital role in evaluating language proficiency, communicative effectiveness, and analytical reasoning.<n>The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has made it increasingly easy to generate coherent, high-quality essays.<n>This chapter first provides an overview of the current landscape of detectors for AI-generated and AI-assisted essays, along with guidelines for their responsible use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T19:51:01Z)
• Evaluation of Large Language Models' educational feedback in Higher Education: potential, limitations and implications for educational practice [0.0]
  This study examines how AI-generated feedback supports student learning using a well-established analytical framework.<n>The evaluation process involved providing seven Large Language Models with a structured rubric, which defined specific criteria and performance levels.<n>Overall, these findings indicate that LLMs can generate well-structured feedback and hold great potential as a sustainable and meaningful feedback tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-24T14:30:25Z)
• Understanding Textual Capability Degradation in Speech LLMs via Parameter Importance Analysis [54.53152524778821]
  integration of speech into Large Language Models (LLMs) has substantially expanded their capabilities, but often at the cost of weakening their core textual competence.<n>We propose an analytical framework based on parameter importance estimation, which reveals that fine-tuning for speech introduces a textual importance distribution shift.<n>We investigate two mitigation strategies: layer-wise learning rate scheduling and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA)<n> Experimental results show that both approaches better maintain textual competence than full fine-tuning, while also improving downstream spoken question answering performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T09:04:40Z)
• Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoning [74.27548620675748]
  Compositional visual reasoning has emerged as a key research frontier in multimodal AI.<n>This survey systematically reviews 260+ papers from top venues (CVPR, ICCV, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL, etc.)<n>We then catalog 60+ benchmarks and corresponding metrics that probe compositional visual reasoning along dimensions such as grounding accuracy, chain-of-thought faithfulness, and high-resolution perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T11:01:51Z)
• Teaching at Scale: Leveraging AI to Evaluate and Elevate Engineering Education [3.557803321422781]
  This article presents a scalable, AI-supported framework for qualitative student feedback using large language models.<n>The system employs hierarchical summarization, anonymization, and exception handling to extract actionable themes from open-ended comments.<n>We report on its successful deployment across a large college of engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T20:27:40Z)
• Unpacking Generative AI in Education: Computational Modeling of Teacher and Student Perspectives in Social Media Discourse [0.5203732344753156]
  This study presents one of the most comprehensive analyses to date of stakeholder discourse dynamics on GAI in education using social media data.<n>Our dataset includes 1,199 Reddit posts and 13,959 corresponding top-level comments.<n>Our findings suggest a need for clearer institutional policies, more transparent GAI integration practices, and support mechanisms for both educators and students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T15:50:08Z)
• The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
  We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z)
• A Structured Unplugged Approach for Foundational AI Literacy in Primary Education [7.495145157323768]
  We propose a structured teaching approach that fosters foundational AI literacy in primary students.<n>Our results indicate improvements in terminology understanding and usage, features description, logical reasoning, and evaluative skills.<n>The approach proved engaging, with students particularly enjoying activities that linked AI concepts to real-world reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T16:23:57Z)
• Form-Substance Discrimination: Concept, Cognition, and Pedagogy [55.2480439325792]
  This paper examines form-substance discrimination as an essential learning outcome for curriculum development in higher education.<n>We propose practical strategies for fostering this ability through curriculum design, assessment practices, and explicit instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T04:15:56Z)
• An Overview of Large Language Models for Statisticians [109.38601458831545]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools in artificial intelligence (AI)<n>This paper explores potential areas where statisticians can make important contributions to the development of LLMs.<n>We focus on issues such as uncertainty quantification, interpretability, fairness, privacy, watermarking and model adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:40:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.