Pre-AF 13: An Interpretable Atrial Fibrillation Risk Score Mined from Discharge Reports

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10725v2
• Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 06:02:35 GMT
• Title: Pre-AF 13: An Interpretable Atrial Fibrillation Risk Score Mined from Discharge Reports
• Abstract summary: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia and a major determinant of prognosis.<n>We developed interpretable ML models predicting AF risk over a 24-month and entire follow-up horizon in CVD patients.<n>Of 80,576 records from 45,000 patients, 17,562 met inclusion criteria; 1,438 (8.19%) developed AF.
• Score: 35.15225826613469
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Background. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia and a major determinant of prognosis. Established AF risk scores rely on factors (older age, hypertension) nearly ubiquitous among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), offering limited stratification in this high-risk group. Most target long-term (5-10 year) rather than medium-term prediction. We developed interpretable ML models predicting AF risk over a 24-month and entire follow-up horizon in CVD patients using routinely collected hospital data. Methods. Single-center retrospective study of electronic health records from the National Research Cardiology Center (Russia) for patients aged >=18 with CVD but without pre-existing AF, hospitalized more than once between January 2012 and May 2019. A custom NLP pipeline transformed unstructured discharge reports into 73 structured features, combining a rule-based parser with transformer-based NER. Using LightAutoML we built a full model (73 features), a simple model (reduced subset), and a linear model for a bedside risk score. Performance was assessed by ROC AUC, compared with CHARGE-AF, C2HEST, MHS, and HAVOC, and interpreted via SHAP. Results. Of 80,576 records from 45,000 patients, 17,562 met inclusion criteria; 1,438 (8.19%) developed AF. The full model reached ROC AUC 0.735 (24-month) and 0.696 (entire follow-up); the simple model was nearly identical (0.725, 0.696). All non-linear models outperformed the four clinical risk scores (ROC AUC 0.53-0.64). The simple model uses 13 features and is named Pre-AF 13. SHAP identified age and left atrial volume as dominant predictors. A linear risk score (Pre-AF 9) stratified observed 24-month AF incidence from ~7% to 36%. Conclusion. Interpretable ML models built from routinely collected EHR data identify high-AF-risk CVD patients, outperforming established clinical risk scores.

Related papers

• RareLens: Towards End-to-End Rare Disease Care via Aligning Divergent Large Language Model Reasoning [42.80742579670377]
  RareLens is a system that supports clinical decision-making across the entire rare disease trajectory.<n>Developed and evaluated on RareBench, a real-world dataset of 157,525 cases spanning all 33 Orphanet categories and more than 7,000 conditions.<n>It achieved an area under the curve of 0.917 for screening and top-1 accuracies of 65.5% and 89.8% for diagnosis and treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-25T16:58:10Z)
• A Breast Vision Pathology Foundation Model for Real-world Clinical Utility [65.57568187389113]
  We present bfBRAVE, a breast-adaptive pathology foundation model developed and evaluated using a total resource of 101,638 breast wholeslide images.<n>BRAVE supported practical roles in the clinical workflow, including safe exclusion of low-risk cases from routine AI-assisted second-review rescue of initially missed positives and prioritization of cases for further assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T07:44:39Z)
• Cerebra: A Multidisciplinary AI Board for Multimodal Dementia Characterization and Risk Assessment [56.62016795093786]
  Cerebra is an interactive multi-agent AI team that coordinates specialized agents for EHR, clinical notes, and medical imaging analysis.<n>It supports privacy-preserving deployment by operating on structured representations and remains robust when modalities are incomplete.<n>Cerebra significantly improved expert performance, increasing accuracy by 17.5 percentage points in prospective dementia risk estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T05:46:45Z)
• Pillar-0: A New Frontier for Radiology Foundation Models [41.640120966890954]
  We introduce Pillar-0, a radiology foundation model pretrained on 42,990 abdomen-pelvis CTs, 86,411 chest CTs, 14,348 head CTs, and 11,543 breast MRIs.<n>Pillar-0 achieves mean AUROCs of 86.4, 88.0, 90.1, and 82.9, outperforming MedGemma (Google), MedImageInsight (Microsoft), Lingshu (Alibaba), and Merlin (Stanford) by 7.8-15.8 AUROC points and ranking best in 87.2% (319/366) tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T21:50:34Z)
• Clinically Interpretable Mortality Prediction for ICU Patients with Diabetes and Atrial Fibrillation: A Machine Learning Approach [3.5626691568652507]
  Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) face elevated mortality in intensive care units (ICUs)<n>This study developed an interpretable machine learning model predicting 28-day mortality in ICU patients with concurrent DM and AF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T22:04:12Z)
• Adaptable Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction from Heterogeneous Data using Large Language Models [70.64969663547703]
  AdaCVD is an adaptable CVD risk prediction framework built on large language models extensively fine-tuned on over half a million participants from the UK Biobank.<n>It addresses key clinical challenges across three dimensions: it flexibly incorporates comprehensive yet variable patient information; it seamlessly integrates both structured data and unstructured text; and it rapidly adapts to new patient populations using minimal additional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T14:42:02Z)
• A Transformer-based survival model for prediction of all-cause mortality in heart failure patients: a multi-cohort study [5.831730826863567]
  We developed and validated TRisk, a Transformer-based AI model predicting 36-month mortality in heart failure patients.<n>Our study included 403,534 heart failure patients (ages 40-90) from 1,418 English general practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T01:53:50Z)
• Detection of subclinical atherosclerosis by image-based deep learning on chest x-ray [86.38767955626179]
  Deep-learning algorithm to predict coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was developed on 460 chest x-ray. The diagnostic accuracy of the AICAC model assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) was the primary outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T16:56:14Z)
• End-to-end Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation from the 12-Lead ECG by Deep Neural Networks [1.4064206416094476]
  Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias that affects millions of people each year worldwide. Machine learning methods have shown promising results in evaluating the risk of developing AF from the electrocardiogram.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T10:47:40Z)
• Performance of multilabel machine learning models and risk stratification schemas for predicting stroke and bleeding risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation [22.45448597986172]
  Multilabel gradient boosting machine provided the best discriminant power for stroke, major bleeding, and death. Models identified additional risk features (such as hemoglobin level, renal function, etc.) for each outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T15:15:03Z)
• A Physiology-Driven Computational Model for Post-Cardiac Arrest Outcome Prediction [0.7930054475711718]
  The aim of this study was to build computational models to predict post-CA outcome. We hypothesized that model performance could be enhanced by integrating physiological time series (PTS) data and by training machine learning (ML) classifiers. Results attest to the effectiveness of ML models for post-CA predictive modeling and suggest that PTS recorded in very early phase after resuscitation encode short-term outcome probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T07:53:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.