Great Disappearance Acts Generative Search and Shadow Banning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11216v1
• Date: Sun, 03 May 2026 10:34:13 GMT
• Title: Great Disappearance Acts Generative Search and Shadow Banning
• Abstract summary: Generative search, powered by Retrieval Augmented Generation RAG, synthesizes content into direct answers, bypassing websites.<n>Shadow banning, a practice that intentionally reduces the visibility of social media posts through algorithmic moderation, exacerbates these issues.<n>This article explores these opaque practices through a legal and regulatory lens.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The internet, once celebrated as a decentralized public sphere, is increasingly undermined by practices such as generative search and shadow banning, which divert traffic and suppress visibility. Generative search, powered by Retrieval Augmented Generation RAG, synthesizes content into direct answers, bypassing websites and depriving them of traffic and revenue. This threatens the sustainability of independent content creators, small enterprises, and the open web ecosystem. Shadow banning, a practice that intentionally reduces the visibility of social media posts through algorithmic moderation, exacerbates these issues by chilling free expression and limiting transparency and accountability. This article explores these opaque practices through a legal and regulatory lens. The first part examines the rise of generative search, analyzing its technological and legal implications, including copyright infringement, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment. It also evaluates potential solutions such as licensing agreements and agentic AI. The second part focuses on shadow banning: algorithmic dissuasion, de-ranking, and the reduction of traffic, with specific attention to Chinas Regulation on Algorithmic Recommendations RAR and the EUs Artificial Intelligence Act AIA. Both frameworks offer partial solutions but fall short of ensuring fairness, transparency, and redress mechanisms. Ultimately, the shift toward centralized control by dominant platforms prioritizes profit and risk management over innovation, fairness, and diversity in online expression. To counteract these trends, regulatory interventions, algorithmic transparency, and equitable frameworks are essential. Without such measures, the internet risks losing its character as a democratized public sphere for free expression and innovation.

Related papers

• Agentic Copyright, Data Scraping & AI Governance: Toward a Coasean Bargain in the Era of Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  This paper examines how the rapid deployment of multi-agentic AI systems is reshaping the foundations of copyright law and creative markets.<n>Existing copyright frameworks are ill-equipped to govern AI agent-mediated interactions that occur at scale, speed, and with limited human oversight.<n>The paper develops a supervised multi-agent governance framework that integrates legal rules and principles, technical protocols, and institutional oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T19:43:28Z)
• Security, privacy, and agentic AI in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections [53.468443050795344]
  The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has led to a dynamic regulatory landscape.<n>As AI paradigms shift towards greater autonomy, specifically in the form of agentic AI, it becomes increasingly challenging to articulate regulatory stipulations.<n>This paper reviews the evolving European Union (EU) AI regulatory provisions via analyzing 24 relevant documents published between 2024 and 2025.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T13:50:52Z)
• Global AI Governance Overview: Understanding Regulatory Requirements Across Global Jurisdictions [0.0]
  The rapid advancement of general-purpose AI models has increased concerns about copyright infringement in training data.<n>This paper examines the regulatory landscape of AI training data governance in major jurisdictions, including the EU, the United States, and the Asia-Pacific region.<n>It also identifies critical gaps in enforcement mechanisms that threaten both creator rights and the sustainability of AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T13:59:11Z)
• Information Retrieval Induced Safety Degradation in AI Agents [52.15553901577888]
  This study investigates how expanding retrieval access affects model reliability, bias propagation, and harmful content generation.<n>Retrieval-enabled agents built on aligned LLMs often behave more unsafely than uncensored models without retrieval.<n>These findings underscore the need for robust mitigation strategies to ensure fairness and reliability in retrieval-enabled and increasingly autonomous AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T11:21:40Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control [44.99833362998488]
  The use of Artificial Intelligence in public administration is expanding rapidly.<n>While AI promises greater efficiency and responsiveness, its integration into government functions raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability.<n>This article applies principal-agent theory to AI adoption as a special case of delegation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T07:46:41Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Generative AI as Digital Media [0.0]
  Generative AI is frequently portrayed as revolutionary or even apocalyptic.<n>This essay argues that such views are misguided.<n>Instead, generative AI should be understood as an evolutionary step in the broader algorithmic media landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T08:58:17Z)
• Uncertain Boundaries: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Copyright Issues in Generative AI [2.2780130786778665]
  Generative AI models generating near-replicas of copyrighted material highlight the need to adapt current legal frameworks.<n>Most existing research on copyright in AI takes a purely computer science or law-based approach.<n>This survey adopts a comprehensive approach synthesizing insights from law, policy, economics, and computer science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T22:10:01Z)
• A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming [124.89885800509505]
  Some researchers fear that conducting such research or releasing their findings will result in account suspensions or legal reprisal. We propose that major AI developers commit to providing a legal and technical safe harbor. We believe these commitments are a necessary step towards more inclusive and unimpeded community efforts to tackle the risks of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T20:55:08Z)
• Fair Enough? A map of the current limitations of the requirements to have fair algorithms [43.609606707879365]
  We argue that there is a hiatus between what the society is demanding from Automated Decision-Making systems, and what this demand actually means in real-world scenarios. We outline the key features of such a hiatus and pinpoint a set of crucial open points that we as a society must address in order to give a concrete meaning to the increasing demand of fairness in Automated Decision-Making systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T08:44:38Z)
• Regulation and NLP (RegNLP): Taming Large Language Models [51.41095330188972]
  We argue how NLP research can benefit from proximity to regulatory studies and adjacent fields. We advocate for the development of a new multidisciplinary research space on regulation and NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T09:22:40Z)
• Dual Governance: The intersection of centralized regulation and crowdsourced safety mechanisms for Generative AI [1.2691047660244335]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has seen mainstream adoption lately, especially in the form of consumer-facing, open-ended, text and image generating models. The potential for generative AI to displace human creativity and livelihoods has also been under intense scrutiny. Existing and proposed centralized regulations by governments to rein in AI face criticisms such as not having sufficient clarity or uniformity. Decentralized protections via crowdsourced safety tools and mechanisms are a potential alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T23:25:21Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.