Rethinking Collaborative Trust for Verifiably Decentralized Blockchain Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29826v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 06:12:52 GMT
• Title: Rethinking Collaborative Trust for Verifiably Decentralized Blockchain Systems
• Abstract summary: Despite the promise of decentralization, measurement studies have identified a conspicuous lack of decentralization in blockchains.<n>We develop a general framework for building verifiably decentralized blockchain systems.<n>We propose a novel reward design that incentivizes users to collaborate with other users without forming isolated coalitions.
• Score: 6.275598027317012
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Despite the promise of decentralization, measurement studies have identified a conspicuous lack of decentralization in blockchains. Centralization has been observed in almost all layers of the blockchain, in decentralized applications, and in decentralized autonomous organizations. In many cases, it is practically impossible to definitively determine the extent of centralization in the system. While multiple works have proposed methods to decrease centralization, by and large blockchains continue to be significantly centralized. In this paper, we develop a general framework for building verifiably decentralized blockchain systems. Our framework is motivated by the core observation that the richness and diversity of collaborative interactions between users -- rather than resource uniformity -- captures the essence and extent of decentralization in a blockchain system. Existing blockchains do not have any incentive mechanisms to encourage inter-coalition collaboration, which directly contributes to centralization. We propose a novel reward design that incentivizes users to collaborate with other users without forming isolated coalitions. Technically, our method uses a Sybil-resistant asymmetric Shapley value for reward attribution within a collaboration group, and the theory of expander graphs for measuring and enforcing decentralization. Our framework is general and can be adapted to alleviate centralization in any layer, application, or decentralized organization. It also has important implications beyond the topic of centralization. For example, we show that our solution can naturally address the blockchain scalability problem. We also identify a new class of decentralized collaborative applications that have hitherto been unexplored in blockchains.

Related papers

• SEDULity: A Proof-of-Learning Framework for Distributed and Secure Blockchains with Efficient Useful Work [41.41842611951311]
  We name the framework SEDULity, which stands for a Secure, Efficient, Distributed, and Useful Learning-based blockchain system.<n>We show that our framework is distributed, secure, and efficiently trains ML models.<n>We further demonstrate that the proposed PoL framework can be extended to other types of useful work and design an incentive mechanism to incentivize task verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T18:55:20Z)
• Towards Secure Decentralized Applications and Consensus Protocols in Blockchains (on Selfish Mining, Undercutting Attacks, DAG-Based Blockchains, E-Voting, Cryptocurrency Wallets, Secure-Logging, and CBDC) [0.5584060970507507]
  We study consensus security in single-chain Proof-of-Work blockchains, including resistance to selfish mining, undercutting, and greedy transaction selection.<n>We advance e-voting with a practical boardroom voting protocol, extend it to a scalable version for millions of participants while preserving security and privacy.<n>Finally, we improve secure logging using blockchains and trusted computing through a centralized ledger that guarantees non-equivocation, integrity, and censorship evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T11:26:43Z)
• When Autonomy Goes Rogue: Preparing for Risks of Multi-Agent Collusion in Social Systems [78.04679174291329]
  We introduce a proof-of-concept to simulate the risks of malicious multi-agent systems (MAS)<n>We apply this framework to two high-risk fields: misinformation spread and e-commerce fraud.<n>Our findings show that decentralized systems are more effective at carrying out malicious actions than centralized ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-19T15:17:30Z)
• Are Crypto Ecosystems (De)centralizing? A Framework for Longitudinal Analysis [0.0]
  We propose a framework for measuring the decentralization of crypto ecosystems over time and compare commonly used decentralization metrics.<n>Our analysis revealed that while crypto has largely become more decentralized over time, recent trends show a shift toward centralization in the consensus layer, NFT marketplaces, and developers.<n>Our framework and results inform researchers, policymakers, and practitioners about the design, regulation, and implementation of crypto ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T23:45:33Z)
• Centralized Trust in Decentralized Systems: Unveiling Hidden Contradictions in Blockchain and Cryptocurrency [0.935356974451955]
  We examine how trust manifests in cryptocurrency ecosystems despite their decentralized architecture.<n>Users actively seek out and create centralized trust anchors, such as established exchanges, prominent community figures, and recognized development teams.<n>We identify how this contradiction arises from users' mental need for accountability and their reluctance to shoulder the full responsibility of self-custody.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-10T14:38:37Z)
• Enhancing Blockchain Cross Chain Interoperability: A Comprehensive Survey [39.613235136790244]
  We systematically analyze over 150 high impact sources from academic journals, digital libraries, and grey literature.<n>We offer a classification of interoperability approaches including Atomic Swaps, Sidechains, Light Clients, and so on, which represent the most comprehensive overview to date.<n>Our findings aim to support researchers, policymakers, and industry leaders in harnessing the transformative potential of blockchain interoperability to address current challenges and drive forward a cohesive multi-chain ecosystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T04:24:50Z)
• Blockchains for Internet of Things: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [38.29453164670072]
  Not every blockchain system is suitable for specific IoT applications. Public blockchains are not suitable for storing sensitive data. We explore the blockchain's application in three pivotal IoT areas: edge AI, communications, and healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T04:25:57Z)
• Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
  Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities. Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy. This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z)
• Generative AI-enabled Blockchain Networks: Fundamentals, Applications, and Case Study [73.87110604150315]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has emerged as a promising solution to address challenges of blockchain technology. In this paper, we first introduce GAI techniques, outline their applications, and discuss existing solutions for integrating GAI into blockchains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T10:46:17Z)
• SoK: A Stratified Approach to Blockchain Decentralization [6.66161432273916]
  We put forth a systematization of the current landscape with respect to decentralization. Our approach dissects blockchain systems into multiple layers, or strata, each possibly encapsulating multiple categories. We introduce a practical test, the "Minimum Decentralization Test" which can provide quick insights about the decentralization state of a blockchain system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T17:13:09Z)
• Taxonomy of Centralization in Public Blockchain Systems: A Systematic Literature Review [2.1315215140430683]
  Bitcoin introduced delegation of control over a monetary system from a select few to all who participate in that system. This delegation is known as the decentralization of controlling power and is a powerful security mechanism for the ecosystem. Recent studies have observed a trend of increased centralization in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T08:58:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.