Quantum vs. Classical Machine Learning: A Unified Empirical Comparison

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01197v2
• Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 11:35:30 GMT
• Title: Quantum vs. Classical Machine Learning: A Unified Empirical Comparison
• Abstract summary: Quantum computing has emerged as a promising computational paradigm for machine learning (ML)<n>This paper presents an empirical study on the performance of QML models and their classical counterparts.<n>Our results indicate that the evaluated quantum machine learning models do not yet surpass the classical baselines in overall prediction performance, policy stability, or training time.
• Score: 10.075151372597423
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum computing has emerged as a promising computational paradigm for machine learning (ML), with the potential to offer computational advantages over classical approaches. At this stage, the evidence supporting the performance and advantages of quantum machine learning (QML) models relative to classical models is insufficient. To address this gap, this paper presents an empirical study on the performance of QML models and their classical counterparts. We compare seven model pairs spanning supervised learning and reinforcement learning. Our results indicate that the evaluated quantum machine learning models do not yet surpass the classical baselines in overall prediction performance, policy stability, or training time. Nevertheless, QML remains a promising approach for filtering noise and controlling false positives. Our research findings summarize the challenges facing quantum machine learning across hardware environments, training efficiency, and convergence stability, providing a foundation for research into the robustness and parameter optimization of QML. This work is publicly available at https://github.com/Z-537-437/QML.

Related papers

• A Primer on Quantum Machine Learning [0.0]
  Quantum machine learning (QML) is a computational paradigm that seeks to apply quantum-mechanical resources to solve learning problems.<n>We outline the field's tensions between practicality and guarantees, access models and speedups, and classical baselines.<n>We aim to provide a friendly map of the QML landscape so that the reader can judge when-and under what assumptions-quantum approaches may offer real benefits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T01:47:21Z)
• Hybrid Quantum-Classical Neural Networks for Few-Shot Credit Risk Assessment [52.05742536403784]
  This work tackles the challenge of few-shot credit risk assessment.<n>We design and implement a novel hybrid quantum-classical workflow.<n>A Quantum Neural Network (QNN) was trained via the parameter-shift rule.<n>On a real-world credit dataset of 279 samples, our QNN achieved a robust average AUC of 0.852 +/- 0.027 in simulations and yielded an impressive AUC of 0.88 in the hardware experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T08:36:05Z)
• VQC-MLPNet: An Unconventional Hybrid Quantum-Classical Architecture for Scalable and Robust Quantum Machine Learning [50.95799256262098]
  Variational quantum circuits (VQCs) hold promise for quantum machine learning but face challenges in expressivity, trainability, and noise resilience.<n>We propose VQC-MLPNet, a hybrid architecture where a VQC generates the first-layer weights of a classical multilayer perceptron during training, while inference is performed entirely classically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T01:38:15Z)
• Computable Model-Independent Bounds for Adversarial Quantum Machine Learning [4.857505043608425]
  We introduce the first of an approximate lower bound for adversarial error when evaluating model resilience against quantum-based adversarial attacks. In the best case, the experimental error is only 10% above the estimated bound, offering evidence of the inherent robustness of quantum models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:56:31Z)
• Quantum-Train: Rethinking Hybrid Quantum-Classical Machine Learning in the Model Compression Perspective [7.7063925534143705]
  We introduce the Quantum-Train(QT) framework, a novel approach that integrates quantum computing with machine learning algorithms. QT achieves remarkable results by employing a quantum neural network alongside a classical mapping model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-18T14:35:57Z)
• Unifying (Quantum) Statistical and Parametrized (Quantum) Algorithms [65.268245109828]
  We take inspiration from Kearns' SQ oracle and Valiant's weak evaluation oracle. We introduce an extensive yet intuitive framework that yields unconditional lower bounds for learning from evaluation queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T18:23:21Z)
• QKSAN: A Quantum Kernel Self-Attention Network [53.96779043113156]
  A Quantum Kernel Self-Attention Mechanism (QKSAM) is introduced to combine the data representation merit of Quantum Kernel Methods (QKM) with the efficient information extraction capability of SAM. A Quantum Kernel Self-Attention Network (QKSAN) framework is proposed based on QKSAM, which ingeniously incorporates the Deferred Measurement Principle (DMP) and conditional measurement techniques. Four QKSAN sub-models are deployed on PennyLane and IBM Qiskit platforms to perform binary classification on MNIST and Fashion MNIST.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T15:08:19Z)
• Pre-training Tensor-Train Networks Facilitates Machine Learning with Variational Quantum Circuits [70.97518416003358]
  Variational quantum circuits (VQCs) hold promise for quantum machine learning on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. While tensor-train networks (TTNs) can enhance VQC representation and generalization, the resulting hybrid model, TTN-VQC, faces optimization challenges due to the Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) condition. To mitigate this challenge, we introduce Pre+TTN-VQC, a pre-trained TTN model combined with a VQC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T03:08:18Z)
• A Novel Stochastic LSTM Model Inspired by Quantum Machine Learning [0.0]
  Works in quantum machine learning (QML) over the past few years indicate that QML algorithms can function just as well as their classical counterparts. This work aims to elucidate if it is possible to achieve some of QML's major reported benefits on classical machines by incorporating itsity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T13:44:25Z)
• A Framework for Demonstrating Practical Quantum Advantage: Racing Quantum against Classical Generative Models [62.997667081978825]
  We build over a proposed framework for evaluating the generalization performance of generative models. We establish the first comparative race towards practical quantum advantage (PQA) between classical and quantum generative models. Our results suggest that QCBMs are more efficient in the data-limited regime than the other state-of-the-art classical generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T22:48:28Z)
• A didactic approach to quantum machine learning with a single qubit [68.8204255655161]
  We focus on the case of learning with a single qubit, using data re-uploading techniques. We implement the different proposed formulations in toy and real-world datasets using the qiskit quantum computing SDK.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T18:25:32Z)
• A preprocessing perspective for quantum machine learning classification advantage using NISQ algorithms [0.0]
  Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQA) shows a gain of performance in balanced accuracy with the LDA technique. Current quantum computers are noisy and have few qubits to test, making it difficult to demonstrate the current and potential quantum advantage of QML methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-28T16:58:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.