Neutralizing Structural Inequality in the Nigerian FinTech Sector
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10317v1
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 13:46:06 GMT
- Title: Neutralizing Structural Inequality in the Nigerian FinTech Sector
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces a hierarchical human-AI triage model for Point of Sale fraud detection in the Nigerian FinTech sector.<n>Adopting a We Are All Equal worldview, we address the challenge of discrimination laundering.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Algorithmic decision systems in financial services often rely on data proxies that inadvertently encode structural inequalities. This paper introduces a hierarchical human-AI triage model for Point of Sale fraud detection in the Nigerian FinTech sector. Adopting a We Are All Equal worldview, we address the challenge of discrimination laundering, wherein the system misinterprets infrastructure related aleatoric noise such as rural network timeouts as fraudulent intent. We implement a three-tier routing policy utilizing a calibrated ensemble model as a primary filter. The policy routes transactions characterized by epistemic uncertainty such as cold start new accounts to specialist analysts while reserving high stakes cases for a senior supervisor. To manage finite human capacity, we utilize a dynamic shadow price to ration human attention and implement a random audit mechanism to prevent human skill atrophy. Our experimental results demonstrate a statistically significant 1.88\% complementarity gap and a 24.79\% percentage point gain in fraud recall over an autonomous baseline. Crucially, the model reduces the regional performance gap from 19.43 to 2.88 percentage points, neutralizing structural bias. Hierarchical collaboration provides a robust mechanism for substantive equality of opportunity, ensuring that rural accounts are not excluded from the digital economy due to environmental brute luck.
Related papers
- Beyond Aggregate Calibration: Decomposing Income-Conditional Recall Disparities in Automated Credit Default Prediction [0.0]
High-income defaulters are disproportionately classified as label noise relative to low-income defaulters.<n>A 16.86 percentage point gap in true positive rate (recall) between high- and low-income borrowers who ultimately defaulted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-08T15:57:15Z) - Compliance Moral Hazard and the Backfiring Mandate [6.584016782022881]
Competing firms that serve shared customer populations face a fundamental information aggregation problem.<n>We develop a mechanism design framework for decentralized risk analytics grounded in anti-money laundering in banking networks.<n>We show competitive pressure amplifies compliance moral hazard and poorly designed mandates can reduce welfare below autarky.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-23T15:46:24Z) - Structural Gender Bias in Credit Scoring: Proxy Leakage [0.0]
This study provides a comprehensive audit of structural gender bias within the Taiwan Credit Default dataset.<n>Despite the removal of explicit protected attributes, our results demonstrate that gendered predictive signals remain deeply embedded within non-sensitive features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T10:29:45Z) - A Sustainable AI Economy Needs Data Deals That Work for Generators [56.949279542190084]
We argue that the machine learning value chain is structurally unsustainable due to an economic data processing inequality.<n>We analyze 73 public data deals and show that the majority of value accrues to aggregators.<n>We propose an Equitable Data-Value Exchange Framework to enable a minimal market that benefits all participants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T01:05:48Z) - Pattern Recognition of Aluminium Arbitrage in Global Trade Data [0.0]
Illicit actors exploit bi-directional tariff incentives by misclassifying scrap as high-count heterogeneous goods.<n>Risk is not concentrated in major exporters but in high-centrality Shadow Hubs that function as pivotal nodes for illicit rerouting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-16T13:52:34Z) - Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems [79.64446272302287]
We formalize a definition for agent evaluation and characterize scaling laws as the interplay between agent quantity, coordination structure, modelic, and task properties.<n>We derive a predictive model using coordination metrics, that cross-validated R2=0, enabling prediction on unseen task domains.<n>We identify three effects: (1) a tool-coordination trade-off: under fixed computational budgets, tool-heavy tasks suffer disproportionately from multi-agent overhead, and (2) a capability saturation: coordination yields diminishing or negative returns once single-agent baselines exceed 45%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T06:52:21Z) - Financial Fraud Identification and Interpretability Study for Listed Companies Based on Convolutional Neural Network [4.504327589607446]
This paper proposes a financial fraud detection framework for Chinese A-share listed companies based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs)<n> Experiments show that the CNN outperforms logistic regression and LightGBM in accuracy, robustness, and early-warning performance.<n>We find that solvency, ratio structure, governance structure, and internal control are general predictors of fraud, while environmental indicators matter mainly in high-pollution industries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-07T04:14:16Z) - Bi-discriminator Domain Adversarial Neural Networks with Class-Level
Gradient Alignment [87.8301166955305]
We propose a novel bi-discriminator domain adversarial neural network with class-level gradient alignment.
BACG resorts to gradient signals and second-order probability estimation for better alignment of domain distributions.
In addition, inspired by contrastive learning, we develop a memory bank-based variant, i.e. Fast-BACG, which can greatly shorten the training process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-21T09:53:17Z) - Latent Imitator: Generating Natural Individual Discriminatory Instances
for Black-Box Fairness Testing [45.183849487268496]
This paper proposes a framework named Latent Imitator (LIMI) to generate more natural individual discriminatory instances.
We first derive a surrogate linear boundary to approximate the decision boundary of the target model.
We then manipulate random latent vectors to the surrogate boundary with a one-step movement, and further conduct vector calculation to probe two potential discriminatory candidates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T11:29:13Z) - Algorithmic Fairness and Vertical Equity: Income Fairness with IRS Tax
Audit Models [73.24381010980606]
This study examines issues of algorithmic fairness in the context of systems that inform tax audit selection by the IRS.
We show how the use of more flexible machine learning methods for selecting audits may affect vertical equity.
Our results have implications for the design of algorithmic tools across the public sector.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-20T16:27:06Z) - An Uncertainty-based Human-in-the-loop System for Industrial Tool Wear
Analysis [68.8204255655161]
We show that uncertainty measures based on Monte-Carlo dropout in the context of a human-in-the-loop system increase the system's transparency and performance.
A simulation study demonstrates that the uncertainty-based human-in-the-loop system increases performance for different levels of human involvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-14T15:47:37Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Consistency Regularization for Cross-Domain Semantic
Segmentation [63.75774438196315]
Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) aims to adapt existing models of the source domain to a new target domain with only unlabeled data.
Most existing methods suffer from noticeable negative transfer resulting from either the error-prone discriminator network or the unreasonable teacher model.
We propose an uncertainty-aware consistency regularization method for cross-domain semantic segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-19T15:30:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.