Empirical Analysis of Evasion and Poisoning Against Malware Data Drift Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03642v3
• Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 03:35:41 GMT
• Title: Empirical Analysis of Evasion and Poisoning Against Malware Data Drift Detection
• Abstract summary: Data drift detector tools are designed for a different purpose and built with different techniques.<n>Evasion and poisoning attacks against machine learning-based malware classifiers can cause misclassification of malware samples.<n>This work investigates the effect of evasion and poisoning attacks on the data drift detector along with the malware classifier.
• Score: 30.004111950667113
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As concept drift due to malware evolution presents challenges for malware classification, machine learning-based data drift detection tools are developed to mitigate this problem. These data drift detector tools are designed for a different purpose and built with different techniques compared to malware classifiers. Although evasion and poisoning attacks against machine learning-based malware classifiers can cause misclassification of malware samples, it is not clear how these attacks work against data drift detectors and malware classifiers in combination. This work investigates the effect of evasion and poisoning attacks on the data drift detector along with the malware classifier. We demonstrate how unique characteristics of data drift detectors cause attacks against malware classifiers to work differently against them.

Related papers

• Detecting and Explaining Malware Family Evolution Using Rule-Based Drift Analysis [0.0]
  Malware detection and classification into families are critical tasks in cybersecurity.<n>This evolution introduces concept drift, in which the statistical properties of malware features change over time.<n>We propose an interpretable approach to concept drift detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T13:07:14Z)
• Certifiably robust malware detectors by design [48.367676529300276]
  We propose a new model architecture for robust malware detection by design.<n>We show that every robust detector can be decomposed into a specific structure, which can be applied to learn empirically robust malware detectors.<n>Our framework ERDALT is based on this structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T09:19:29Z)
• Revisiting Concept Drift in Windows Malware Detection: Adaptation to Real Drifted Malware with Minimal Samples [10.352741619176383]
  We propose a new technique for detecting and classifying drifted malware.<n>It learns drift-invariant features in malware control flow graphs by leveraging graph neural networks with adversarial domain adaptation.<n>Our approach significantly improves drifted malware detection on publicly available benchmarks and real-world malware databases reported daily by security companies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T22:06:20Z)
• Exploring Model Dynamics for Accumulative Poisoning Discovery [62.08553134316483]
  We propose a novel information measure, namely, Memorization Discrepancy, to explore the defense via the model-level information. By implicitly transferring the changes in the data manipulation to that in the model outputs, Memorization Discrepancy can discover the imperceptible poison samples. We thoroughly explore its properties and propose Discrepancy-aware Sample Correction (DSC) to defend against accumulative poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T14:45:24Z)
• DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified Robustness [58.23214712926585]
  We develop a certified defense, DRSM (De-Randomized Smoothed MalConv), by redesigning the de-randomized smoothing technique for the domain of malware detection. Specifically, we propose a window ablation scheme to provably limit the impact of adversarial bytes while maximally preserving local structures of the executables. We are the first to offer certified robustness in the realm of static detection of malware executables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T17:25:22Z)
• Fast & Furious: Modelling Malware Detection as Evolving Data Streams [6.6892028759947175]
  Malware is a major threat to computer systems and imposes many challenges to cyber security. In this work, we evaluate the impact of concept drift on malware classifiers for two Android datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T18:43:40Z)
• Mate! Are You Really Aware? An Explainability-Guided Testing Framework for Robustness of Malware Detectors [49.34155921877441]
  We propose an explainability-guided and model-agnostic testing framework for robustness of malware detectors. We then use this framework to test several state-of-the-art malware detectors' abilities to detect manipulated malware. Our findings shed light on the limitations of current malware detectors, as well as how they can be improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T08:02:38Z)
• Being Single Has Benefits. Instance Poisoning to Deceive Malware Classifiers [47.828297621738265]
  We show how an attacker can launch a sophisticated and efficient poisoning attack targeting the dataset used to train a malware classifier. As opposed to other poisoning attacks in the malware detection domain, our attack does not focus on malware families but rather on specific malware instances that contain an implanted trigger. We propose a comprehensive detection approach that could serve as a future sophisticated defense against this newly discovered severe threat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T15:27:44Z)
• Adversarial EXEmples: A Survey and Experimental Evaluation of Practical Attacks on Machine Learning for Windows Malware Detection [67.53296659361598]
  adversarial EXEmples can bypass machine learning-based detection by perturbing relatively few input bytes. We develop a unifying framework that does not only encompass and generalize previous attacks against machine-learning models, but also includes three novel attacks. These attacks, named Full DOS, Extend and Shift, inject the adversarial payload by respectively manipulating the DOS header, extending it, and shifting the content of the first section.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T07:16:57Z)
• MDEA: Malware Detection with Evolutionary Adversarial Learning [16.8615211682877]
  MDEA, an Adversarial Malware Detection model uses evolutionary optimization to create attack samples to make the network robust against evasion attacks. By retraining the model with the evolved malware samples, its performance improves a significant margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T09:59:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.