German parties shifted towards intuition-based rhetoric after the far right's parliamentary breakthrough

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05075v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:19:12 GMT
• Title: German parties shifted towards intuition-based rhetoric after the far right's parliamentary breakthrough
• Abstract summary: We analyse 4.5 million tweets and 59,170 parliamentary speeches by German political elites between 2015 and 2025.<n>We measure evidence-based and intuition-based rhetoric using a validated distributed dictionary representation.<n>Findings document an association between far-right visibility and a changing approach to truth in elite discourse in a multiparty European democracy.
• Score: 0.5166324348704702
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The spread of misinformation is widely perceived as a threat to democratic deliberation, yet how political elites' rhetorical commitments to truth shift alongside the rise of populist actors remains poorly understood. Analysing 4.5 million tweets and 59,170 parliamentary speeches by German political elites between 2015 and 2025, we measure evidence-based and intuition-based rhetoric using a validated distributed dictionary representation. Across both arenas, intuition-based language has become more prominent, and right-leaning actors consistently exhibit the lowest Evidence Minus Intuition (EMI) scores. The parliamentary entry of the extreme-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) in 2017 coincides with sharp downward shifts in EMI across the broader chamber, while a more gradual decline is observed on Twitter. These findings document an association between far-right visibility and a changing approach to truth in elite discourse in a multiparty European democracy.

Related papers

• Epistemic orientation in parliamentary discourse is associated with deliberative democracy [0.5607632629560914]
  We introduce a scalable approach to measure epistemic orientation using the Evidence--Minus--Intuition ( EMI) score.<n>We apply this approach to 15 million parliamentary speech segments spanning 1946 to 2025 across seven countries.<n>We find that EMI is positively associated with deliberative democracy within countries over time, with consistent relationships in both contemporaneous and lagged analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T17:19:09Z)
• Framing Migration: A Computational Analysis of UK Parliamentary Discourse [5.95326662995992]
  We analyse migration-related discourse in UK parliamentary debates spanning over 75 years.<n>Using open-weight LLMs, we annotate each statement with high-level stances toward migrants.<n>We track the net tone toward migrants across time and political parties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T17:31:57Z)
• LLM Analysis of 150+ years of German Parliamentary Debates on Migration Reveals Shift from Post-War Solidarity to Anti-Solidarity in the Last Decade [17.8054316171213]
  Migration has been a core topic in German political debate.<n>Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to partially automate even complex annotation tasks.<n>We evaluate the influence of model size, prompting differences, fine-tuning, historical versus contemporary data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T23:16:03Z)
• Affective Polarization Amongst Swedish Politicians [0.0]
  This study investigates affective polarization among Swedish politicians on Twitter from 2021 to 2023.<n>Negative partisanship becomes significantly more dominant when the in-group is defined at the party level.<n>Negative partisanship also proves to be a strategic choice for online visibility, attracting 3.18 more likes and 1.69 more retweets on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T14:40:48Z)
• A Cautionary Tale About "Neutrally" Informative AI Tools Ahead of the 2025 Federal Elections in Germany [41.972629376586035]
  We examine the reliability of AI-based Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) and large language models (LLMs) in providing objective political information.<n>Our analysis is based upon a comparison with party responses to 38 statements of the Wahl-O-Mat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T16:30:53Z)
• Aligning AI with Public Values: Deliberation and Decision-Making for Governing Multimodal LLMs in Political Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  How AI models should deal with political topics has been discussed, but it remains challenging and requires better governance.<n>This paper examines the governance of large language models through individual and collective deliberation, focusing on politically sensitive videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models [54.48283690603358]
  This study seeks to identify and quantify biases in simulating political samples with Large Language Models. Using the GPT-3.5-Turbo model, we leverage data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, Zuobiao dataset, and China Family Panel Studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T05:52:26Z)
• Whose Side Are You On? Investigating the Political Stance of Large Language Models [56.883423489203786]
  We investigate the political orientation of Large Language Models (LLMs) across a spectrum of eight polarizing topics. Our investigation delves into the political alignment of LLMs across a spectrum of eight polarizing topics, spanning from abortion to LGBTQ issues. The findings suggest that users should be mindful when crafting queries, and exercise caution in selecting neutral prompt language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T04:02:24Z)
• Syntactic Language Change in English and German: Metrics, Parsers, and Convergences [56.47832275431858]
  The current paper looks at diachronic trends in syntactic language change in both English and German, using corpora of parliamentary debates from the last c. 160 years. We base our observations on five dependencys, including the widely used Stanford Core as well as 4 newer alternatives. We show that changes in syntactic measures seem to be more frequent at the tails of sentence length distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T11:46:16Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.<n>We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur: Visual Communication of Uncertainty in Election Polls [56.8172499765118]
  We discuss potential sources of bias in nowcasting and forecasting. Concepts are presented to attenuate the issue of falsely perceived accuracy. One key idea is the use of Probabilities of Events instead of party shares.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T07:02:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.