Reinforcement Learning-Based Production Scheduling in an Industry-Based Coating Scenario Using the Digital Model Playground
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14122v1
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:28:20 GMT
- Title: Reinforcement Learning-Based Production Scheduling in an Industry-Based Coating Scenario Using the Digital Model Playground
- Abstract summary: This paper demonstrates the applicability of reinforcement learning (RL)-based scheduling in an industry-inspired coating process.<n>Two algorithms, Deep Q-Networks and Proximal Policy Optimization, are benchmarked against conventional dispatching rules.<n>Results indicate that RL-based scheduling achieves balanced improvements across key performance indicators.
- Score: 0.6999740786886536
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Production scheduling in complex manufacturing environments is challenging when sequence-dependent setup times, stochastic disturbances, and due-date constraints must be addressed simultaneously. While reinforcement learning (RL) methods have shown promising results in research, most studies rely on simplified benchmark processes, limiting their industrial relevance. This paper demonstrates the applicability of RL-based scheduling in an industry-inspired coating process that reflects practical complexities such as sequence-dependent setup times, machine breakdowns, and variable utilization. The open-source Digital Model Playground (DMPG), a discrete event simulation framework, is used to model the scenario and to train RL agents. Two standard algorithms, Deep Q-Networks and Proximal Policy Optimization, are benchmarked against conventional dispatching rules to illustrate feasibility and to provide a transparent testbed for further research. Results indicate that RL-based scheduling achieves balanced improvements across key performance indicators, with PPO delivering the most robust performance. The main contribution of this work is to bridge the gap between academic research and industrial practice by validating RL-based scheduling in a realistic, shareable scenario and by providing a reusable open-source framework for future studies.
Related papers
- Test-Time Gradient Guidance of Flow Policies in Reinforcement Learning [50.738952715864116]
Expressive continuous control policies form the backbone of advances in scaling imitation learning for simulated and real robot control.<n>We propose QGF (Q-Guided Flow), an RL algorithm that performs policy optimization entirely at test time.<n> Empirically, QGF outperforms prior test-time RL methods on single-task and goal-conditioned offline RL benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-09T16:45:57Z) - Understanding by Reconstruction: Reversing the Software Development Process for LLM Pretraining [66.89012795621349]
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with the deep, long-horizon reasoning required for complex software engineering.<n>We propose a novel paradigm: understanding via reconstruction.<n>We introduce a framework that synthesizes latent agentic trajectories using a multi-agent simulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T09:23:20Z) - Variational Approach for Job Shop Scheduling [2.256375838037721]
This paper proposes a novel Variational Graph-to-Scheduler (VG2S) framework for solving the Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP)<n>The proposed method exhibits superior zero-shot generalization compared with state-of-the-art DRL baselines and traditional dispatching rules.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T23:55:18Z) - ProRAG: Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [54.071574153853994]
ProRAG is a process-supervised reinforcement learning framework designed to integrate learned step-level supervision into the online optimization loop.<n>Our framework consists of four stages: (1) Supervised Policy Warmup to initialize the model with a structured reasoning format; (2) construction of an MCTS-based Process Reward Model (PRM) to quantify intermediate reasoning quality; (3) PRM-Guided Reasoning Refinement to align the policy with fine-grained process preferences; and (4) Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning with a dual-granularity advantage mechanism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T16:04:59Z) - Sample-Efficient Neurosymbolic Deep Reinforcement Learning [49.60927398960061]
We propose a neuro-symbolic Deep RL approach that integrates background symbolic knowledge to improve sample efficiency.<n>Online reasoning is performed to guide the training process through two mechanisms.<n>We show improved performance over a state-of-the-art reward machine baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T09:28:53Z) - A Distribution-Aware Flow-Matching for Generating Unstructured Data for Few-Shot Reinforcement Learning [1.0709300917082865]
We introduce a distribution-aware flow matching approach to generate synthetic unstructured data for few-shot reinforcement learning.<n>Our approach addresses key challenges in traditional model-based RL, such as overfitting and data correlation.<n>Results demonstrate that our method achieves stable convergence in terms of maximum Q-value while enhancing frame rates by 30% in the initial timestamps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-21T15:50:59Z) - REBEL: Reinforcement Learning via Regressing Relative Rewards [59.68420022466047]
We propose REBEL, a minimalist RL algorithm for the era of generative models.<n>In theory, we prove that fundamental RL algorithms like Natural Policy Gradient can be seen as variants of REBEL.<n>We find that REBEL provides a unified approach to language modeling and image generation with stronger or similar performance as PPO and DPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-25T17:20:45Z) - Deep reinforcement learning for machine scheduling: Methodology, the
state-of-the-art, and future directions [2.4541568670428915]
Machine scheduling aims to optimize job assignments to machines while adhering to manufacturing rules and job specifications.
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), a key component of artificial general intelligence, has shown promise in various domains like gaming and robotics.
This paper offers a comprehensive review and comparison of DRL-based approaches, highlighting their methodology, applications, advantages, and limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T22:45:09Z) - Provable Reward-Agnostic Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning [61.39541986848391]
Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) is a paradigm in which an RL agent learns to optimize a task using pair-wise preference-based feedback over trajectories.
We propose a theoretical reward-agnostic PbRL framework where exploratory trajectories that enable accurate learning of hidden reward functions are acquired.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T15:00:09Z) - A Memetic Algorithm with Reinforcement Learning for Sociotechnical
Production Scheduling [0.0]
This article presents a memetic algorithm with applying deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to flexible job shop scheduling problems (DRC-FJSSP)
From research projects in industry, we recognize the need to consider flexible machines, flexible human workers, worker capabilities, setup and processing operations, material arrival times, complex job paths with parallel tasks for bill of material manufacturing, sequence-dependent setup times and (partially) automated tasks in human-machine-collaboration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-21T11:24:32Z) - Towards Standardizing Reinforcement Learning Approaches for Stochastic
Production Scheduling [77.34726150561087]
reinforcement learning can be used to solve scheduling problems.
Existing studies rely on (sometimes) complex simulations for which the code is unavailable.
There is a vast array of RL designs to choose from.
standardization of model descriptions - both production setup and RL design - and validation scheme are a prerequisite.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-16T16:07:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.