Forgetting, plasticity, and co-observation: a third facet of continual learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18803v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:59:59 GMT
• Title: Forgetting, plasticity, and co-observation: a third facet of continual learning
• Abstract summary: Efficient continual learning remains a fundamental challenge for deep neural networks.<n>We show that catastrophic forgetting and loss of plasticity are widely considered the primary obstacles to overcome.<n>We highlight data co-observation as a distinct factor influencing continual learning performance.
• Score: 35.010469869321305
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Efficient continual learning remains a fundamental challenge for deep neural networks. While catastrophic forgetting and loss of plasticity are widely considered the primary obstacles to overcome, we show that these two issues cannot fully explain the performance gap between naive sequential training and offline joint training. In this paper, we highlight data co-observation as a distinct factor influencing continual learning performance. By decoupling the constraints of separate data access from stability and plasticity, we systematically investigate the representational benefits gained by observing training data together. Empirically, we demonstrate a consistent performance difference between joint and separate training across both supervised and self-supervised paradigms in generic data-incremental "chunking" scenarios, whilst mitigating forgetting and controlling for plasticity. Our findings indicate that simultaneous observation of training data (co-observation) yields benefits to the learner's generalization that extend well beyond mere knowledge retention, and that this effect does not require a specific continual distribution shift. Furthermore, we contextualize prominent continual learning mechanisms through this lens: while distillation-based approaches act only as effective knowledge retention mechanisms, our results suggest that the empirical success of memory replay goes beyond the mitigation of forgetting, actively reintroducing the benefits of data co-observation into the learning process.

Related papers

• Understanding Catastrophic Interference: On the Identifibility of Latent Representations [67.05452287233122]
  Catastrophic interference, also known as catastrophic forgetting, is a fundamental challenge in machine learning.<n>We propose a novel theoretical framework that formulates catastrophic interference as an identification problem.<n>Our approach provides both theoretical guarantees and practical performance improvements across both synthetic and benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T00:53:32Z)
• Efficient Machine Unlearning via Influence Approximation [75.31015485113993]
  Influence-based unlearning has emerged as a prominent approach to estimate the impact of individual training samples on model parameters without retraining.<n>This paper establishes a theoretical link between memorizing (incremental learning) and forgetting (unlearning)<n>We introduce the Influence Approximation Unlearning algorithm for efficient machine unlearning from the incremental perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T05:34:27Z)
• Action Chunking and Exploratory Data Collection Yield Exponential Improvements in Behavior Cloning for Continuous Control [24.901172157291096]
  Action-chunking (predicting sequences of actions in open-loop) and exploratory augmentation of expert demonstrations are studied.<n>Our results identify control-theoretic stability as the key mechanism underlying the benefits of these interventions.<n>On the theoretical side, we demonstrate that the control-theoretic lens provides fine-grained insights into how compounding error arises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T22:36:39Z)
• Global Convergence of Continual Learning on Non-IID Data [51.99584235667152]
  We provide a general and comprehensive theoretical analysis for continual learning of regression models.<n>We establish the almost sure convergence results of continual learning under a general data condition for the first time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T10:06:07Z)
• Learning to Unlearn while Retaining: Combating Gradient Conflicts in Machine Unlearning [20.479485237420985]
  We propose Learning to Unlearn while Retaining, aimed to mitigate gradient conflicts between unlearning and retention objectives.<n>Our approach strategically avoids conflicts through an implicit gradient regularization mechanism that emerges naturally within the proposed framework.<n>We validate our approach across both discriminative and generative tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness in achieving unlearning without compromising performance on remaining data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T21:00:36Z)
• Temporal-Difference Variational Continual Learning [77.92320830700797]
  We propose new learning objectives that integrate the regularization effects of multiple previous posterior estimations.<n>Our approach effectively mitigates Catastrophic Forgetting, outperforming strong Variational CL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T10:58:41Z)
• The Curse of Diversity in Ensemble-Based Exploration [7.209197316045156]
  Training a diverse ensemble of data-sharing agents can significantly impair the performance of the individual ensemble members. We name this phenomenon the curse of diversity. We demonstrate the potential of representation learning to counteract the curse of diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T14:14:50Z)
• Relaxed Contrastive Learning for Federated Learning [48.96253206661268]
  We propose a novel contrastive learning framework to address the challenges of data heterogeneity in federated learning. Our framework outperforms all existing federated learning approaches by huge margins on the standard benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T04:55:24Z)
• Stable and Causal Inference for Discriminative Self-supervised Deep Visual Representations [10.41003719027387]
  We analyze discriminative self-supervised methods from a causal perspective to explain unstable behaviors. Our solutions involve tempering a linear transformation with controlled synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T12:30:17Z)
• The Difficulty of Passive Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning [26.124032923011328]
  Learning to act from observational data without active environmental interaction is a well-known challenge in Reinforcement Learning (RL) Recent approaches involve constraints on the learned policy or conservative updates, preventing strong deviations from the state-action distribution of the dataset. We propose the "tandem learning" experimental paradigm which facilitates our empirical analysis of the difficulties in offline reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:50:49Z)
• Towards Unbiased Visual Emotion Recognition via Causal Intervention [63.74095927462]
  We propose a novel Emotion Recognition Network (IERN) to alleviate the negative effects brought by the dataset bias. A series of designed tests validate the effectiveness of IERN, and experiments on three emotion benchmarks demonstrate that IERN outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T10:40:59Z)
• Provably Efficient Causal Reinforcement Learning with Confounded Observational Data [135.64775986546505]
  We study how to incorporate the dataset (observational data) collected offline, which is often abundantly available in practice, to improve the sample efficiency in the online setting. We propose the deconfounded optimistic value iteration (DOVI) algorithm, which incorporates the confounded observational data in a provably efficient manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T14:49:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.