The rule of conditional probability is valid in quantum theory [Comment on Gelman & Yao's "Holes in Bayesian Statistics"]

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.08160v3
• Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:55:11 GMT
• Title: The rule of conditional probability is valid in quantum theory [Comment on Gelman & Yao's "Holes in Bayesian Statistics"]
• Authors: P.G.L. Porta Mana
• Abstract summary: In a recent manuscript, Gelman & Yao claim that "the usual rules of conditional probability fail in the quantum realm" This comment recalls some relevant literature in quantum theory and shows that (i) Gelman & Yao's statements are false; in fact, the quantum example confirms the rules of probability theory; (ii) the particular inequality found in the quantum example can be shown to appear also in very non-quantum examples, such as drawing from an urn.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In a recent manuscript, Gelman & Yao (2020) claim that "the usual rules of conditional probability fail in the quantum realm" and that "probability theory isn't true (quantum physics)" and purport to support these statements with the example of a quantum double-slit experiment. The present comment recalls some relevant literature in quantum theory and shows that (i) Gelman & Yao's statements are false; in fact, the quantum example confirms the rules of probability theory; (ii) the particular inequality found in the quantum example can be shown to appear also in very non-quantum examples, such as drawing from an urn; thus there is nothing peculiar to quantum theory in this matter. A couple of wrong or imprecise statements about quantum theory in the cited manuscript are also corrected.

Related papers

• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
  A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical. We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more. Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z)
• On the Interpretation of Quantum Indistinguishability : a No-Go Theorem [0.0]
  Physicists are yet to reach a consensus on the interpretation of a quantum wavefunction. We show that quantum mechanical prediction of maximal violation of Mermin inequality is incompatible with all ontological interpretations for quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T18:39:25Z)
• Testing real quantum theory in an optical quantum network [1.6720048283946962]
  We show that tests in the spirit of a Bell inequality can reveal quantum predictions in entanglement swapping scenarios. We disproving real quantum theory as a universal physical theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T05:09:36Z)
• On the relation between quantum theory and probability [0.0]
  The theory of probability and the quantum theory, the one mathematical and the other physical, are related in that each admits a number of very different interpretations. It has been proposed that the conceptual problems of the quantum theory could be, if not resolved, at least mitigated by a proper interpretation of probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-19T15:24:19Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Tossing Quantum Coins and Dice [0.0]
  This case is an important example of a quantum procedure because it presents a typical framework employed in quantum information processing and quantum computing. The emphasis is on the clarification of the difference between quantum and classical conditional probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T11:39:56Z)
• Ruling out real-valued standard formalism of quantum theory [19.015836913247288]
  A quantum game has been developed to distinguish standard quantum theory from its real-number analog. We experimentally implement the quantum game based on entanglement swapping with a state-of-the-art fidelity of 0.952(1). Our results disprove the real-number formulation and establish the indispensable role of complex numbers in the standard quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T03:56:13Z)
• Experimental Validation of Fully Quantum Fluctuation Theorems Using Dynamic Bayesian Networks [48.7576911714538]
  Fluctuation theorems are fundamental extensions of the second law of thermodynamics for small systems. We experimentally verify detailed and integral fully quantum fluctuation theorems for heat exchange using two quantum-correlated thermal spins-1/2 in a nuclear magnetic resonance setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-11T12:55:17Z)
• Impossibility of creating a superposition of unknown quantum states [16.467540842571328]
  We show that the existence of a protocol that superposes two unknown pure states with nonzero probability leads to violation of other no-go theorems. Such a protocol can be used to perform certain state discrimination and cloning tasks that are forbidden in quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T13:25:42Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.