Impact of meta-roles on the evolution of organisational institutions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.04096v1
• Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 07:00:00 GMT
• Title: Impact of meta-roles on the evolution of organisational institutions
• Authors: Amir Hosein Afshar Sedigh, Martin K. Purvis, Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Maryam A. Purvis, and Christopher K. Frantz
• Abstract summary: The study embeds agents' meta-roles in the BDI architecture. The study scrutinises the impact of cognitive dissonance in agents due to unfairness of institutions. Results show how change in roles of agents coupled with specific institutional characteristics leads to changes of the rules in the system.
• Score: 0.8563354084119061
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of changes in agents' beliefs coupled with dynamics in agents' meta-roles on the evolution of institutions. The study embeds agents' meta-roles in the BDI architecture. In this context, the study scrutinises the impact of cognitive dissonance in agents due to unfairness of institutions. To showcase our model, two historical long-distance trading societies, namely Armenian merchants of New-Julfa and the English East India Company are simulated. Results show how change in roles of agents coupled with specific institutional characteristics leads to changes of the rules in the system.

Related papers

• An Organizationally-Oriented Approach to Enhancing Explainability and Control in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning can lead to the development of collaborative agent behaviors that show similarities with organizational concepts. We introduce a novel framework that explicitly incorporates organizational roles and goals from the $mathcalMOISE+$ model into the MARL process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T22:43:01Z)
• Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges [88.3032929492409]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents, with goal-driven behaviors and dynamic adaptation capabilities, potentially represent a critical pathway toward artificial general intelligence. This survey systematically deconstructs LLM agent systems through a methodology-centered taxonomy. Our work provides a unified architectural perspective, examining how agents are constructed, how they collaborate, and how they evolve over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T12:50:17Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems. Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Do as We Do, Not as You Think: the Conformity of Large Language Models [46.23852835759767]
  This paper presents a study on conformity in large language models (LLMs) driven collaborative AI systems. We focus on three aspects: the existence of conformity, the factors influencing conformity, and potential mitigation strategies. Our analysis delves into factors influencing conformity, including interaction time and majority size, and examines how the subject agent rationalizes its conforming behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T04:50:03Z)
• Identifiable Exchangeable Mechanisms for Causal Structure and Representation Learning [54.69189620971405]
  We provide a unified framework, termed Identifiable Exchangeable Mechanisms (IEM), for representation and structure learning. IEM provides new insights that let us relax the necessary conditions for causal structure identification in exchangeable non-i.i.d. data. We also demonstrate the existence of a duality condition in identifiable representation learning, leading to new identifiability results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:30:25Z)
• MARS: Benchmarking the Metaphysical Reasoning Abilities of Language Models with a Multi-task Evaluation Dataset [50.36095192314595]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) function as conscious agents with generalizable reasoning capabilities. This ability remains underexplored due to the complexity of modeling infinite possible changes in an event. We introduce the first-ever benchmark, MARS, comprising three tasks corresponding to each step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T08:35:04Z)
• Understanding the Factors Influencing Self-Managed Enterprises of Crowdworkers: A Comprehensive Review [49.623146117284115]
  This paper investigates the shift in crowdsourcing towards self-managed enterprises of crowdworkers (SMECs) It reviews the literature to understand the foundational aspects of this shift, focusing on identifying key factors that may explain the rise of SMECs. The study aims to guide future research and inform policy and platform development, emphasizing the importance of fair labor practices in this evolving landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T14:33:16Z)
• Emergence of Social Norms in Generative Agent Societies: Principles and Architecture [8.094425852451643]
  We propose a novel architecture, named CRSEC, to empower the emergence of social norms within generative MASs. Our architecture consists of four modules: Creation & Representation, Spreading, Evaluation, and Compliance. Our experiments demonstrate the capability of our architecture to establish social norms and reduce social conflicts within generative MASs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T05:08:10Z)
• The Good Shepherd: An Oracle Agent for Mechanism Design [6.226991885861965]
  We propose an algorithm for constructing agents that perform well when evaluated over the learning trajectory of their adaptive co-players. Our results show that our mechanisms are able to shepherd the participants strategies towards favorable outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T11:28:09Z)
• Transformers with Competitive Ensembles of Independent Mechanisms [97.93090139318294]
  We propose a new Transformer layer which divides the hidden representation and parameters into multiple mechanisms, which only exchange information through attention. We study TIM on a large-scale BERT model, on the Image Transformer, and on speech enhancement and find evidence for semantically meaningful specialization as well as improved performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-27T21:48:46Z)
• Models we Can Trust: Toward a Systematic Discipline of (Agent-Based) Model Interpretation and Validation [0.0]
  We advocate the development of a discipline of interacting with and extracting information from models. We outline some directions for the development of a such a discipline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T10:52:22Z)
• Learning Latent Representations to Influence Multi-Agent Interaction [65.44092264843538]
  We propose a reinforcement learning-based framework for learning latent representations of an agent's policy. We show that our approach outperforms the alternatives and learns to influence the other agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-12T19:04:26Z)
• Domain-independent generation and classification of behavior traces [18.086782548507855]
  CABBOT is a learning technique that allows the agent to perform on-line classification of the type of planning agent whose behavior is observing. We present experiments in several (both financial and non-financial) domains with promising results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T16:58:54Z)
• On the Relationship Between Active Inference and Control as Inference [62.997667081978825]
  Active Inference (AIF) is an emerging framework in the brain sciences which suggests that biological agents act to minimise a variational bound on model evidence. Control-as-Inference (CAI) is a framework within reinforcement learning which casts decision making as a variational inference problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T13:03:58Z)
• Impact of different belief facets on agents' decision -- a refined cognitive architecture to model the interaction between organisations' institutional characteristics and agents' behaviour [0.8563354084119061]
  We investigate the impact of personality and the way that an agent weights its internal beliefs and social sanctions on an agent's actions. The study also uses the concept of cognitive dissonance associated with the fairness of institutions to investigate the agents' behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T17:06:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.