Looking for Fairness in Recommender Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12242v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 13:53:02 GMT
• Title: Looking for Fairness in Recommender Systems
• Authors: Cécile Logé,
• Abstract summary: We're in the process of building a recommender system to make content suggestions to users on social media.<n>A shared fairness concern across all three is the emergence of filter bubbles.<n>From the user's perspective, this is akin to manipulation.<n>From society's perspective, the potential consequences are far-reaching.
• Score: 0.6216023343793144
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recommender systems can be found everywhere today, shaping our everyday experience whenever we're consuming content, ordering food, buying groceries online, or even just reading the news. Let's imagine we're in the process of building a recommender system to make content suggestions to users on social media. When thinking about fairness, it becomes clear there are several perspectives to consider: the users asking for tailored suggestions, the content creators hoping for some limelight, and society at large, navigating the repercussions of algorithmic recommendations. A shared fairness concern across all three is the emergence of filter bubbles, a side-effect that takes place when recommender systems are almost "too good", making recommendations so tailored that users become inadvertently confined to a narrow set of opinions/themes and isolated from alternative ideas. From the user's perspective, this is akin to manipulation. From the small content creator's perspective, this is an obstacle preventing them access to a whole range of potential fans. From society's perspective, the potential consequences are far-reaching, influencing collective opinions, social behavior and political decisions. How can our recommender system be fine-tuned to avoid the creation of filter bubbles, and ensure a more inclusive and diverse content landscape? Approaching this problem involves defining one (or more) performance metric to represent diversity, and tweaking our recommender system's performance through the lens of fairness. By incorporating this metric into our evaluation framework, we aim to strike a balance between personalized recommendations and the broader societal goal of fostering rich and varied cultures and points of view.

Related papers

• Why Multi-Interest Fairness Matters: Hypergraph Contrastive Multi-Interest Learning for Fair Conversational Recommender System [55.39026603611269]
  We propose a novel framework, Hypergraph Contrastive Multi-Interest Learning for Fair Conversational Recommender System (HyFairCRS)<n>HyFairCRS aims to promote multi-interest diversity fairness in dynamic and interactive Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs)<n> Experiments on two CRS-based datasets show that HyFairCRS achieves a new state-of-the-art performance while effectively alleviating unfairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T11:39:42Z)
• Bypassing the Popularity Bias: Repurposing Models for Better Long-Tail Recommendation [0.0]
  We aim to achieve a more equitable distribution of exposure among publishers on an online content platform. We propose a novel approach of repurposing existing components of an industrial recommender system to deliver valuable exposure to underrepresented publishers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T15:40:55Z)
• User Welfare Optimization in Recommender Systems with Competing Content Creators [65.25721571688369]
  In this study, we perform system-side user welfare optimization under a competitive game setting among content creators. We propose an algorithmic solution for the platform, which dynamically computes a sequence of weights for each user based on their satisfaction of the recommended content. These weights are then utilized to design mechanisms that adjust the recommendation policy or the post-recommendation rewards, thereby influencing creators' content production strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T21:09:52Z)
• Fairness Through Domain Awareness: Mitigating Popularity Bias For Music Discovery [56.77435520571752]
  We explore the intrinsic relationship between music discovery and popularity bias. We propose a domain-aware, individual fairness-based approach which addresses popularity bias in graph neural network (GNNs) based recommender systems. Our approach uses individual fairness to reflect a ground truth listening experience, i.e., if two songs sound similar, this similarity should be reflected in their representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T14:12:25Z)
• A Survey on Fairness-aware Recommender Systems [59.23208133653637]
  We present concepts of fairness in different recommendation scenarios, comprehensively categorize current advances, and introduce typical methods to promote fairness in different stages of recommender systems. Next, we delve into the significant influence that fairness-aware recommender systems exert on real-world industrial applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T07:08:22Z)
• Improving Recommendation System Serendipity Through Lexicase Selection [53.57498970940369]
  We propose a new serendipity metric to measure the presence of echo chambers and homophily in recommendation systems. We then attempt to improve the diversity-preservation qualities of well known recommendation techniques by adopting a parent selection algorithm known as lexicase selection. Our results show that lexicase selection, or a mixture of lexicase selection and ranking, outperforms its purely ranked counterparts in terms of personalization, coverage and our specifically designed serendipity benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T15:37:38Z)
• The Amplification Paradox in Recommender Systems [12.723777984461693]
  We show through simulations that the collaborative-filtering nature of recommender systems and the nicheness of extreme content can resolve the apparent paradox. Our results call for a nuanced interpretation of algorithmic amplification'' and highlight the importance of modeling the utility of content to users when auditing recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T09:12:48Z)
• Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for Recommendation [76.75990595228666]
  This paper formalizes a family of exposure fairness metrics that model the problem jointly from the perspective of both the consumers and producers. Specifically, we consider group attributes for both types of stakeholders to identify and mitigate fairness concerns that go beyond individual users and items towards more systemic biases in recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T19:13:23Z)
• Two-Sided Fairness in Non-Personalised Recommendations [6.403167095324894]
  We discuss on two specific fairness concerns together (traditionally studied separately)---user fairness and organisational fairness. For user fairness, we test with methods from social choice theory, i.e., various voting rules known to better represent user choices in their results. Analysing the results obtained from voting rule-based recommendation, we find that while the well-known voting rules are better from the user side, they show high bias values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-10T18:11:37Z)
• Echo Chambers in Collaborative Filtering Based Recommendation Systems [1.5140493624413542]
  We simulate the recommendations given by collaborative filtering algorithms on users in the MovieLens data set. We find that prolonged exposure to system-generated recommendations substantially decreases content diversity. Our work suggests that once these echo-chambers have been established, it is difficult for an individual user to break out by manipulating solely their own rating vector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-08T02:35:47Z)
• Middle-Aged Video Consumers' Beliefs About Algorithmic Recommendations on YouTube [2.8325478162326885]
  We conduct semi-structured interviews with middle-aged YouTube video consumers to analyze user beliefs about the video recommendation system. We identify four groups of user beliefs: Previous Actions, Social Media, Recommender System, and Company Policy. We propose a framework to distinguish the four main actors that users believe influence their video recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T14:35:50Z)
• Exploring User Opinions of Fairness in Recommender Systems [13.749884072907163]
  We ask users what their ideas of fair treatment in recommendation might be. We analyze what might cause discrepancies or changes between user's opinions towards fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-13T19:44:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.