Risk Management Framework for Machine Learning Security
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.04884v1
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 06:21:34 GMT
- Title: Risk Management Framework for Machine Learning Security
- Authors: Jakub Breier and Adrian Baldwin and Helen Balinsky and Yang Liu
- Abstract summary: Adversarial attacks for machine learning models have become a highly studied topic both in academia and industry.
In this paper, we outline a novel framework to guide the risk management process for organizations reliant on machine learning models.
- Score: 7.678455181587705
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Adversarial attacks for machine learning models have become a highly studied
topic both in academia and industry. These attacks, along with traditional
security threats, can compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability
of organization's assets that are dependent on the usage of machine learning
models. While it is not easy to predict the types of new attacks that might be
developed over time, it is possible to evaluate the risks connected to using
machine learning models and design measures that help in minimizing these
risks.
In this paper, we outline a novel framework to guide the risk management
process for organizations reliant on machine learning models. First, we define
sets of evaluation factors (EFs) in the data domain, model domain, and security
controls domain. We develop a method that takes the asset and task importance,
sets the weights of EFs' contribution to confidentiality, integrity, and
availability, and based on implementation scores of EFs, it determines the
overall security state in the organization. Based on this information, it is
possible to identify weak links in the implemented security measures and find
out which measures might be missing completely. We believe our framework can
help in addressing the security issues related to usage of machine learning
models in organizations and guide them in focusing on the adequate security
measures to protect their assets.
Related papers
- Threat Modelling and Risk Analysis for Large Language Model (LLM)-Powered Applications [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various applications by providing advanced natural language processing capabilities.
This paper explores the threat modeling and risk analysis specifically tailored for LLM-powered applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T16:43:58Z) - RMF: A Risk Measurement Framework for Machine Learning Models [2.9833943723592764]
It is important to measure the security of a system that uses machine learning (ML) as a component.
This paper focuses on the field of ML, particularly the security of autonomous vehicles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-15T13:22:47Z) - Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress.
Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief.
By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z) - Mapping LLM Security Landscapes: A Comprehensive Stakeholder Risk Assessment Proposal [0.0]
We propose a risk assessment process using tools like the risk rating methodology which is used for traditional systems.
We conduct scenario analysis to identify potential threat agents and map the dependent system components against vulnerability factors.
We also map threats against three key stakeholder groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-20T05:17:22Z) - Securing Federated Learning with Control-Flow Attestation: A Novel Framework for Enhanced Integrity and Resilience against Adversarial Attacks [2.28438857884398]
Federated Learning (FL) as a distributed machine learning paradigm has introduced new cybersecurity challenges.
This study proposes an innovative security framework inspired by Control-Flow (CFA) mechanisms, traditionally used in cybersecurity.
We authenticate and verify the integrity of model updates across the network, effectively mitigating risks associated with model poisoning and adversarial interference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-15T04:03:34Z) - Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [74.13100479426424]
We show how to leverage proxy criticality metrics to generate safety margins.
We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T16:49:54Z) - Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical
Tasks [70.76757529955577]
This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL.
We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection.
To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z) - Self-Destructing Models: Increasing the Costs of Harmful Dual Uses of
Foundation Models [103.71308117592963]
We present an algorithm for training self-destructing models leveraging techniques from meta-learning and adversarial learning.
In a small-scale experiment, we show MLAC can largely prevent a BERT-style model from being re-purposed to perform gender identification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-27T21:43:45Z) - Assessing Risks and Modeling Threats in the Internet of Things [0.0]
We develop an IoT attack taxonomy that describes the adversarial assets, adversarial actions, exploitable vulnerabilities, and compromised properties that are components of any IoT attack.
We use this IoT attack taxonomy as the foundation for designing a joint risk assessment and maturity assessment framework.
The usefulness of this IoT framework is highlighted by case study implementations in the context of multiple industrial manufacturing companies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-14T23:36:00Z) - RoFL: Attestable Robustness for Secure Federated Learning [59.63865074749391]
Federated Learning allows a large number of clients to train a joint model without the need to share their private data.
To ensure the confidentiality of the client updates, Federated Learning systems employ secure aggregation.
We present RoFL, a secure Federated Learning system that improves robustness against malicious clients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T15:42:49Z) - Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance.
We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems.
We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.