Modeling and mitigation of cross-talk effects in readout noise with applications to the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.02331v3
• Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 17:58:53 GMT
• Title: Modeling and mitigation of cross-talk effects in readout noise with applications to the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
• Authors: Filip B. Maciejewski, Flavio Baccari, Zolt\'an Zimbor\'as, Micha{\l} Oszmaniec
• Abstract summary: Noise mitigation can be performed up to some error for which we derive upper bounds. Experiments on 15 (23) qubits using IBM's devices to test both the noise model and the error-mitigation scheme. We show that similar effects are expected for Haar-random quantum states and states generated by shallow-depth random circuits.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce a correlated measurement noise model that can be efficiently described and characterized, and which admits effective noise-mitigation on the level of marginal probability distributions. Noise mitigation can be performed up to some error for which we derive upper bounds. Characterization of the model is done efficiently using Diagonal Detector Overlapping Tomography -- a generalization of the recently introduced Quantum Overlapping Tomography to the problem of reconstruction of readout noise with restricted locality. The procedure allows to characterize $k$-local measurement cross-talk on $N$-qubit device using $O(k2^klog(N))$ circuits containing random combinations of X and identity gates. We perform experiments on 15 (23) qubits using IBM's (Rigetti's) devices to test both the noise model and the error-mitigation scheme, and obtain an average reduction of errors by a factor $>22$ ($>5.5$) compared to no mitigation. Interestingly, we find that correlations in the measurement noise do not correspond to the physical layout of the device. Furthermore, we study numerically the effects of readout noise on the performance of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). We observe in simulations that for numerous objective Hamiltonians, including random MAX-2-SAT instances and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model, the noise-mitigation improves the quality of the optimization. Finally, we provide arguments why in the course of QAOA optimization the estimates of the local energy (or cost) terms often behave like uncorrelated variables, which greatly reduces sampling complexity of the energy estimation compared to the pessimistic error analysis. We also show that similar effects are expected for Haar-random quantum states and states generated by shallow-depth random circuits.

Related papers

• Fault Tolerance Embedded in a Quantum-Gap-Estimation Algorithm with Trial-State Optimization [0.0]
  We show that the spectral peak of an exact target gap can be amplified beyond the noise threshold, thereby reducing gap-estimate error. Our results reveal the potential for accurate quantum simulations on near-term noisy quantum computers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T17:57:15Z)
• Lindblad-like quantum tomography for non-Markovian quantum dynamical maps [46.350147604946095]
  We introduce Lindblad-like quantum tomography (L$ell$QT) as a quantum characterization technique of time-correlated noise in quantum information processors. We discuss L$ell$QT for the dephasing dynamics of single qubits in detail, which allows for a neat understanding of the importance of including multiple snapshots of the quantum evolution in the likelihood function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T19:29:12Z)
• Optimized Noise Suppression for Quantum Circuits [0.40964539027092917]
  Crosstalk noise is a severe error source in, e.g., cross-resonance based superconducting quantum processors. Intrepid programming algorithm extends previous work on optimized qubit routing by swap insertion. We evaluate the proposed method by characterizing crosstalk noise for two chips with up to 127 qubits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T07:34:59Z)
• Negative Pre-aware for Noisy Cross-modal Matching [46.5591267410225]
  Cross-modal noise-robust learning is a challenging task since noisy correspondence is hard to recognize and rectify. We present a novel Negative Pre-aware Cross-modal matching solution for large visual-language model fine-tuning on noisy downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T05:52:36Z)
• Efficient reconstruction, benchmarking and validation of cross-talk models in readout noise in near-term quantum devices [3.1410859223862113]
  We introduce an appropriately tailored quantum detector tomography protocol, which enables efficient characterization of $k-$local cross-talk effects in the readout noise. We show that QDOT data provides information about suitably defined reduced POVM operators, correlations and coherences in the readout noise. We apply our method to investigate cross-talk effects on 79 qubit Rigetti and 127 qubit IBM devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T17:33:29Z)
• Emergence of noise-induced barren plateaus in arbitrary layered noise models [44.99833362998488]
  In variational quantum algorithms the parameters of a parameterized quantum circuit are optimized in order to minimize a cost function that encodes the solution of the problem. We discuss how, and in which sense, the phenomenon of noise-induced barren plateaus emerges in parameterized quantum circuits with a layered noise model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T15:18:27Z)
• Classical simulations of noisy variational quantum circuits [0.0]
  Noisely affects quantum computations so that they not only become less accurate but also easier to simulate classically as systems scale up. We construct a classical simulation algorithm, LOWESA, for estimating expectation values of noisy parameterised quantum circuits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T17:52:30Z)
• Error-aware Quantization through Noise Tempering [43.049102196902844]
  Quantization-aware training (QAT) optimize model parameters with respect to the end task while simulating quantization error. In this work, we incorporate exponentially decaying quantization-error-aware noise together with a learnable scale of task loss gradient to approximate the effect of a quantization operator. Our method obtains state-of-the-art top-1 classification accuracy for uniform (non mixed-precision) quantization, out-performing previous methods by 0.5-1.2% absolute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-11T20:37:50Z)
• Error Mitigation-Aided Optimization of Parameterized Quantum Circuits: Convergence Analysis [42.275148861039895]
  Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) offer the most promising path to obtaining quantum advantages via noisy processors. gate noise due to imperfections and decoherence affects the gradient estimates by introducing a bias. Quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques can reduce the estimation bias without requiring any increase in the number of qubits. QEM can reduce the number of required iterations, but only as long as the quantum noise level is sufficiently small.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-23T10:48:04Z)
• Characterizing and mitigating coherent errors in a trapped ion quantum processor using hidden inverses [0.20315704654772418]
  Quantum computing testbeds exhibit high-fidelity quantum control over small collections of qubits. These noisy intermediate-scale devices can support a sufficient number of sequential operations prior to decoherence. While the results of these algorithms are imperfect, these imperfections can help bootstrap quantum computer testbed development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T20:35:24Z)
• Shape Matters: Understanding the Implicit Bias of the Noise Covariance [76.54300276636982]
  Noise in gradient descent provides a crucial implicit regularization effect for training over parameterized models. We show that parameter-dependent noise -- induced by mini-batches or label perturbation -- is far more effective than Gaussian noise. Our analysis reveals that parameter-dependent noise introduces a bias towards local minima with smaller noise variance, whereas spherical Gaussian noise does not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T18:31:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.