A Computational Model of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13151v1
• Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 13:53:56 GMT
• Title: A Computational Model of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
• Authors: Nieves Montes
• Abstract summary: This work presents the first attempt to turn the IAD framework into a computational model. We define the Action Situation Language -- or ASL -- whose syntax is tailored to the components of the IAD framework and that we use to write descriptions of social interactions. These models can be analyzed with the standard tools of game theory to predict which outcomes are being most incentivized, and evaluated according to their socially relevant properties.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework is a conceptual toolbox put forward by Elinor Ostrom and colleagues in an effort to identify and delineate the universal common variables that structure the immense variety of human interactions. The framework identifies rules as one of the core concepts to determine the structure of interactions, and acknowledges their potential to steer a community towards more beneficial and socially desirable outcomes. This work presents the first attempt to turn the IAD framework into a computational model to allow communities of agents to formally perform what-if analysis on a given rule configuration. To do so, we define the Action Situation Language -- or ASL -- whose syntax is hgighly tailored to the components of the IAD framework and that we use to write descriptions of social interactions. ASL is complemented by a game engine that generates its semantics as an extensive-form game. These models, then, can be analyzed with the standard tools of game theory to predict which outcomes are being most incentivized, and evaluated according to their socially relevant properties.

Related papers

• Enhanced Classroom Dialogue Sequences Analysis with a Hybrid AI Agent: Merging Expert Rule-Base with Large Language Models [7.439914834067705]
  This study develops a comprehensive rule base of dialogue sequences and an Artificial Intelligence (AI) agent. The agent applies expert knowledge while adapting to the complexities of natural language, enabling accurate and flexible categorisation of classroom dialogue sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T08:13:41Z)
• Advancing Interactive Explainable AI via Belief Change Theory [5.842480645870251]
  We argue that this type of formalisation provides a framework and a methodology to develop interactive explanations. We first define a novel, logic-based formalism to represent explanatory information shared between humans and machines. We then consider real world scenarios for interactive XAI, with different prioritisations of new and existing knowledge, where our formalism may be instantiated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T13:11:56Z)
• Interactive Topic Models with Optimal Transport [75.26555710661908]
  We present EdTM, as an approach for label name supervised topic modeling. EdTM models topic modeling as an assignment problem while leveraging LM/LLM based document-topic affinities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T13:57:27Z)
• An Encoding of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks into Higher-Order Logic [57.24311218570012]
  This approach allows for the computer-assisted analysis of abstract dialectical frameworks. Exemplary applications include the formal analysis and verification of meta-theoretical properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T09:32:26Z)
• Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI [64.59151650272477]
  We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-04T17:44:58Z)
• Dialectical Reconciliation via Structured Argumentative Dialogues [14.584998154271512]
  Our framework enables dialectical reconciliation to address knowledge discrepancies between an explainer (AI agent) and an explainee (human user) Our findings suggest that our framework offers a promising direction for fostering effective human-AI interactions in domains where explainability is important.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T13:39:36Z)
• Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
  Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z)
• Models we Can Trust: Toward a Systematic Discipline of (Agent-Based) Model Interpretation and Validation [0.0]
  We advocate the development of a discipline of interacting with and extracting information from models. We outline some directions for the development of a such a discipline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T10:52:22Z)
• RADDLE: An Evaluation Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Robust Task-oriented Dialog Systems [75.87418236410296]
  We introduce the RADDLE benchmark, a collection of corpora and tools for evaluating the performance of models across a diverse set of domains. RADDLE is designed to favor and encourage models with a strong generalization ability. We evaluate recent state-of-the-art systems based on pre-training and fine-tuning, and find that grounded pre-training on heterogeneous dialog corpora performs better than training a separate model per domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T08:58:49Z)
• Exploring Probabilistic Soft Logic as a framework for integrating top-down and bottom-up processing of language in a task context [0.6091702876917279]
  The architecture integrates existing NLP components to produce candidate analyses on eight levels of linguistic modeling. The architecture builds on Universal Dependencies (UD) as its representation formalism on the form level and on Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs) to represent semantic analyses of learner answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T11:00:07Z)
• A Dependency Syntactic Knowledge Augmented Interactive Architecture for End-to-End Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis [73.74885246830611]
  We propose a novel dependency syntactic knowledge augmented interactive architecture with multi-task learning for end-to-end ABSA. This model is capable of fully exploiting the syntactic knowledge (dependency relations and types) by leveraging a well-designed Dependency Relation Embedded Graph Convolutional Network (DreGcn) Extensive experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-04T14:59:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.