A Computational Model of the Institutional Analysis and Development
Framework
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13151v1
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 13:53:56 GMT
- Title: A Computational Model of the Institutional Analysis and Development
Framework
- Authors: Nieves Montes
- Abstract summary: This work presents the first attempt to turn the IAD framework into a computational model.
We define the Action Situation Language -- or ASL -- whose syntax is tailored to the components of the IAD framework and that we use to write descriptions of social interactions.
These models can be analyzed with the standard tools of game theory to predict which outcomes are being most incentivized, and evaluated according to their socially relevant properties.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: The Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework is a conceptual
toolbox put forward by Elinor Ostrom and colleagues in an effort to identify
and delineate the universal common variables that structure the immense variety
of human interactions. The framework identifies rules as one of the core
concepts to determine the structure of interactions, and acknowledges their
potential to steer a community towards more beneficial and socially desirable
outcomes. This work presents the first attempt to turn the IAD framework into a
computational model to allow communities of agents to formally perform what-if
analysis on a given rule configuration. To do so, we define the Action
Situation Language -- or ASL -- whose syntax is hgighly tailored to the
components of the IAD framework and that we use to write descriptions of social
interactions. ASL is complemented by a game engine that generates its semantics
as an extensive-form game. These models, then, can be analyzed with the
standard tools of game theory to predict which outcomes are being most
incentivized, and evaluated according to their socially relevant properties.
Related papers
- Interactive Topic Models with Optimal Transport [75.26555710661908]
We present EdTM, as an approach for label name supervised topic modeling.
EdTM models topic modeling as an assignment problem while leveraging LM/LLM based document-topic affinities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T13:57:27Z) - Towards a Unified Framework for Evaluating Explanations [0.6138671548064356]
We argue that explanations serve as mediators between models and stakeholders, whether for intrinsically interpretable models or opaque black-box models.
We illustrate these criteria, as well as specific evaluation methods, using examples from an ongoing study of an interpretable neural network for predicting a particular learner behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T21:49:28Z) - An Encoding of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks into Higher-Order Logic [57.24311218570012]
This approach allows for the computer-assisted analysis of abstract dialectical frameworks.
Exemplary applications include the formal analysis and verification of meta-theoretical properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-08T09:32:26Z) - Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI [64.59151650272477]
We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors.
This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-04T17:44:58Z) - Establishing Trustworthiness: Rethinking Tasks and Model Evaluation [36.329415036660535]
We argue that it is time to rethink what constitutes tasks and model evaluation in NLP.
We review existing compartmentalized approaches for understanding the origins of a model's functional capacity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T06:32:10Z) - Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP.
This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z) - Models we Can Trust: Toward a Systematic Discipline of (Agent-Based)
Model Interpretation and Validation [0.0]
We advocate the development of a discipline of interacting with and extracting information from models.
We outline some directions for the development of a such a discipline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-23T10:52:22Z) - RADDLE: An Evaluation Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Robust
Task-oriented Dialog Systems [75.87418236410296]
We introduce the RADDLE benchmark, a collection of corpora and tools for evaluating the performance of models across a diverse set of domains.
RADDLE is designed to favor and encourage models with a strong generalization ability.
We evaluate recent state-of-the-art systems based on pre-training and fine-tuning, and find that grounded pre-training on heterogeneous dialog corpora performs better than training a separate model per domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-29T08:58:49Z) - Modelling Compositionality and Structure Dependence in Natural Language [0.12183405753834563]
Drawing on linguistics and set theory, a formalisation of these ideas is presented in the first half of this thesis.
We see how cognitive systems that process language need to have certain functional constraints.
Using the advances of word embedding techniques, a model of relational learning is simulated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-22T17:28:50Z) - Exploring Probabilistic Soft Logic as a framework for integrating
top-down and bottom-up processing of language in a task context [0.6091702876917279]
The architecture integrates existing NLP components to produce candidate analyses on eight levels of linguistic modeling.
The architecture builds on Universal Dependencies (UD) as its representation formalism on the form level and on Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs) to represent semantic analyses of learner answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-15T11:00:07Z) - A Dependency Syntactic Knowledge Augmented Interactive Architecture for
End-to-End Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis [73.74885246830611]
We propose a novel dependency syntactic knowledge augmented interactive architecture with multi-task learning for end-to-end ABSA.
This model is capable of fully exploiting the syntactic knowledge (dependency relations and types) by leveraging a well-designed Dependency Relation Embedded Graph Convolutional Network (DreGcn)
Extensive experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-04T14:59:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.