Voter Perceptions of Trust in Risk-Limiting Audits

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07918v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:36:17 GMT
• Title: Voter Perceptions of Trust in Risk-Limiting Audits
• Abstract summary: Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are expected to strengthen the public confidence in the correctness of an election outcome. For large margins between the winner and the runner-up, the number of ballots to be drawn can be so small that voters lose confidence. We conduct a user study with 105 participants resident in the US.
• Score: 0.6445605125467572
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are expected to strengthen the public confidence in the correctness of an election outcome. We hypothesize that this is not always the case, in part because for large margins between the winner and the runner-up, the number of ballots to be drawn can be so small that voters lose confidence. We conduct a user study with 105 participants resident in the US. Our findings confirm the hypothesis, showing that our study participants felt less confident when they were told the number of ballots audited for RLAs. We elaborate on our findings and propose recommendations for future use of RLAs.

Related papers

• Advances in STV Margin Computation [48.286570305557525]
  This paper presents substantial improvements on an existing algorithm for computing lower bounds on the margin of an STV election.<n>These improvements allow us to compute higher lower bounds for real STV elections, making mismatch-based risk-limiting audits more practical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T11:08:52Z)
• Risk-Limiting Audits for Parliamentary Majorities [0.0]
  In parliamentary elections, the politically relevant outcome is whether a party has won enough seats to form government, not whether every reported seat outcome is correct.<n>We propose a partial conjunction testing problem where the winning party truly won at least a majority of its reported seats.<n>We show that auditing the parliamentary majority can substantially reduce the number of inspected ballots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T09:12:07Z)
• Sublinear Risk-Limiting Audits from Direct Ballot Selection and Statistical Ballot Manifests [47.94589114324381]
  Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are post-election auditing procedures that rigorously guarantee a specified maximum probability that an incorrect electoral outcome will not be detected.<n>While typical electoral procedures automatically provide rough estimates for batch sizes, even slight inaccuracies invalidate conventional RLAs.<n>We propose two new risk-limiting techniques: A statistical mechanism for ensuring that the batch sizes reported by an untrusted tabulation are, in fact, an accurate manifest and a new class of RLAs called direct ballot selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T17:12:11Z)
• Recommender Systems for Democracy: Toward Adversarial Robustness in Voting Advice Applications [18.95453617434051]
  Voting advice applications (VAAs) help millions of voters understand which political parties or candidates best align with their views.<n>This paper explores the potential risks these applications pose to the democratic process when targeted by adversarial entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T16:38:06Z)
• Doing More With Less: Mismatch-Based Risk-Limiting Audits [52.25213882366808]
  One approach to risk-limiting audits (RLAs) compares randomly selected cast vote records (CVRs) to votes read by human auditors. We investigate whether the total number of mismatches in the full set of CVRs exceeds the minimum number of CVR errors required for the reported outcome to be wrong.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T12:47:54Z)
• 3+ Seat Risk-Limiting Audits for Single Transferable Vote Elections [56.12949230611067]
  We present an assertion-based approach to conducting full or partial RLAs for STV elections with three or more seats. We show that we can quite often form partial audits that verify most, and sometimes all, of the reported winners. We evaluate our method on a dataset of over 500 three- and four-seat STV elections from the 2017 and 2022 local council elections in Scotland.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T00:29:53Z)
• Efficient Lower Bounding of Single Transferable Vote Election Margins [56.12949230611067]
  Single transferable vote (STV) is a system of preferential proportional voting employed in multi-seat elections. The margin of victory, or simply'margin', is the smallest number of ballots that need to be manipulated to alter the set of winners. Lower bounds on the margin can also be used for this purpose, in cases where exact margins are difficult to compute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T13:39:23Z)
• Improving the Computational Efficiency of Adaptive Audits of IRV Elections [54.427049258408424]
  AWAIRE can audit IRV contests with any number of candidates, but the original implementation incurred memory and computation costs that grew superexponentially with the number of candidates. This paper improves the algorithmic implementation of AWAIRE in three ways that make it practical to audit IRV contests with 55 candidates, compared to the previous 6 candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T13:28:00Z)
• Intelligo ut Confido: Understanding, Trust and User Experience in Verifiable Receipt-Free E-Voting (long version) [1.306972554821087]
  We present a study with 300 participants which aims to evaluate the voters' experience of the receipt-freeness procedures in the e-voting protocol Selene. While the usability and trust factors were rated low in the experiments, we found a positive correlation between trust and understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T07:49:39Z)
• The Decisive Power of Indecision: Low-Variance Risk-Limiting Audits and Election Contestation via Marginal Mark Recording [51.82772358241505]
  Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are techniques for verifying the outcomes of large elections. We define new families of audits that improve efficiency and offer advances in statistical power. New audits are enabled by revisiting the standard notion of a cast-vote record so that it can declare multiple possible mark interpretations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T16:23:54Z)
• Reconfidencing LLMs from the Grouping Loss Perspective [56.801251926946485]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to generating hallucinated answers in a confident tone. Recent findings show that controlling uncertainty must go beyond calibration. We construct a new evaluation dataset derived from a knowledge base to assess confidence scores given to answers of Mistral and LLaMA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T15:40:22Z)
• Adaptively Weighted Audits of Instant-Runoff Voting Elections: AWAIRE [61.872917066847855]
  Methods for auditing instant-runoff voting (IRV) elections are either not risk-limiting or require cast vote records (CVRs), the voting system's electronic record of the votes on each ballot. We develop an RLA method that uses adaptively weighted averages of test supermartingales to efficiently audit IRV elections when CVRs are not available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T15:55:34Z)
• Has the Machine Learning Review Process Become More Arbitrary as the Field Has Grown? The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment [86.77085171670323]
  We present a larger-scale variant of the 2014 NeurIPS experiment in which 10% of conference submissions were reviewed by two independent committees to quantify the randomness in the review process. We observe that the two committees disagree on their accept/reject recommendations for 23% of the papers and that, consistent with the results from 2014, approximately half of the list of accepted papers would change if the review process were randomly rerun.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T21:26:12Z)
• Auditing Ranked Voting Elections with Dirichlet-Tree Models: First Steps [23.14629947453497]
  Ranked voting systems are used in many places around the world. There is no known risk-limiting audit (RLA) method for STV other than a full hand count. We present a new approach to auditing ranked systems that uses a statistical model, a Dirichlet-tree, that can cope with high-dimensional parameters in a computationally efficient manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-29T13:06:42Z)
• A First Approach to Risk-Limiting Audits for Single Transferable Vote Elections [27.102139020324678]
  Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are an increasingly important method for checking that the reported outcome of an election is, in fact, correct. This paper presents the first approach to risk-limiting audits for single transferable vote (STV) elections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-18T12:36:39Z)
• Bribery as a Measure of Candidate Success: Complexity Results for Approval-Based Multiwinner Rules [58.8640284079665]
  We study the problem of bribery in multiwinner elections, for the case where the voters cast approval ballots (i.e., sets of candidates they approve) We consider a number of approval-based multiwinner rules (AV, SAV, GAV, RAV, approval-based Chamberlin--Courant, and PAV) In general, our problems tend to be easier when we limit out bribery actions on increasing the number of approvals of the candidate that we want to be in a winning committee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T08:26:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.