Can uncertainty boost the reliability of AI-based diagnostic methods in
digital pathology?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09693v1
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:10:00 GMT
- Title: Can uncertainty boost the reliability of AI-based diagnostic methods in
digital pathology?
- Authors: Milda Pocevi\v{c}i\=ut\.e, Gabriel Eilertsen, Sofia Jarkman, Claes
Lundstr\"om
- Abstract summary: We evaluate if adding uncertainty estimates for DL predictions in digital pathology could result in increased value for the clinical applications.
We compare the effectiveness of model-integrated methods (MC dropout and Deep ensembles) with a model-agnostic approach.
Our results show that uncertainty estimates can add some reliability and reduce sensitivity to classification threshold selection.
- Score: 3.8424737607413157
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Deep learning (DL) has shown great potential in digital pathology
applications. The robustness of a diagnostic DL-based solution is essential for
safe clinical deployment. In this work we evaluate if adding uncertainty
estimates for DL predictions in digital pathology could result in increased
value for the clinical applications, by boosting the general predictive
performance or by detecting mispredictions. We compare the effectiveness of
model-integrated methods (MC dropout and Deep ensembles) with a model-agnostic
approach (Test time augmentation, TTA). Moreover, four uncertainty metrics are
compared. Our experiments focus on two domain shift scenarios: a shift to a
different medical center and to an underrepresented subtype of cancer. Our
results show that uncertainty estimates can add some reliability and reduce
sensitivity to classification threshold selection. While advanced metrics and
deep ensembles perform best in our comparison, the added value over simpler
metrics and TTA is small. Importantly, the benefit of all evaluated uncertainty
estimation methods is diminished by domain shift.
Related papers
- SepsisLab: Early Sepsis Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification and Active Sensing [67.8991481023825]
Sepsis is the leading cause of in-hospital mortality in the USA.
Existing predictive models are usually trained on high-quality data with few missing information.
For the potential high-risk patients with low confidence due to limited observations, we propose a robust active sensing algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T04:47:36Z) - Unified Uncertainty Estimation for Cognitive Diagnosis Models [70.46998436898205]
We propose a unified uncertainty estimation approach for a wide range of cognitive diagnosis models.
We decompose the uncertainty of diagnostic parameters into data aspect and model aspect.
Our method is effective and can provide useful insights into the uncertainty of cognitive diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-09T13:48:20Z) - Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning Based Segmentation: A
Post-Hoc Approach for Left Ventricle Volume Estimation in MRI [0.0]
Left ventricular (LV) volume estimation is critical for valid diagnosis and management of various cardiovascular conditions.
Recent machine learning advancements, particularly U-Net-like convolutional networks, have facilitated automated segmentation for medical images.
This study proposes a novel methodology for post-hoc uncertainty estimation in LV volume prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T13:44:55Z) - Benchmarking Scalable Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification in Organ
Segmentation [7.313010190714819]
quantifying uncertainty associated with model predictions is crucial in critical clinical applications.
Deep learning based methods for automatic organ segmentation have shown promise in aiding diagnosis and treatment planning.
It is unclear which method is preferred in the medical image analysis setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T00:09:33Z) - Automatic diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis severity using Swin
transformer [55.01037422579516]
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a widespread condition that can cause chronic pain and stiffness in the knee joint.
We propose an automated approach that employs the Swin Transformer to predict the severity of KOA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T09:49:30Z) - Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by utilizing Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [52.03490691733464]
We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.
By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for the problem of medical image segmentation.
DeviS incorporates an uncertainty-aware filtering module, which utilizes the metric of uncertainty-calibrated error to filter reliable data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z) - Uncertainty estimations methods for a deep learning model to aid in
clinical decision-making -- a clinician's perspective [0.0]
There are several deep learning-inspired uncertainty estimation techniques, but few are implemented on medical datasets.
We compared dropout variational inference (DO), test-time augmentation (TTA), conformal predictions, and single deterministic methods for estimating uncertainty.
It may be important to evaluate multiple estimations techniques before incorporating a model into clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-02T17:54:54Z) - Improving Trustworthiness of AI Disease Severity Rating in Medical
Imaging with Ordinal Conformal Prediction Sets [0.7734726150561088]
A lack of statistically rigorous uncertainty quantification is a significant factor undermining trust in AI results.
Recent developments in distribution-free uncertainty quantification present practical solutions for these issues.
We demonstrate a technique for forming ordinal prediction sets that are guaranteed to contain the correct stenosis severity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-05T18:01:20Z) - BSM loss: A superior way in modeling aleatory uncertainty of
fine_grained classification [0.0]
We propose a modified Bootstrapping loss(BS loss) function with Mixup data augmentation strategy.
Our experiments indicated that BS loss with Mixup(BSM) model can halve the Expected Error(ECE) compared to standard data augmentation.
BSM model is able to perceive the semantic distance of out-of-domain data, demonstrating high potential in real-world clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-09T13:06:51Z) - Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised
Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks.
Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets.
We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z) - UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced
Data [81.00385374948125]
We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model.
UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data.
We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)
UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.