Connecting Surrogate Safety Measures to Crash Probablity via Causal Probabilistic Time Series Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01363v1
• Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 04:08:59 GMT
• Title: Connecting Surrogate Safety Measures to Crash Probablity via Causal Probabilistic Time Series Prediction
• Authors: Jiajian Lu, Offer Grembek, Mark Hansen
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a method to connect surrogate safety measures to crash probability using probabilistic time series prediction. The method used sequences of speed, acceleration and time-to-collision to estimate the probability density functions of those variables. The estimated sequence is accurate and the conditional crash probability shows the effectiveness of evasive action to avoid crashes in a counterfactual experiment.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Surrogate safety measures can provide fast and pro-active safety analysis and give insights on the pre-crash process and crash failure mechanism by studying near misses. However, validating surrogate safety measures by connecting them to crashes is still an open question. This paper proposed a method to connect surrogate safety measures to crash probability using probabilistic time series prediction. The method used sequences of speed, acceleration and time-to-collision to estimate the probability density functions of those variables with transformer masked autoregressive flow (transformer-MAF). The autoregressive structure mimicked the causal relationship between condition, action and crash outcome and the probability density functions are used to calculate the conditional action probability, crash probability and conditional crash probability. The predicted sequence is accurate and the estimated probability is reasonable under both traffic conflict context and normal interaction context and the conditional crash probability shows the effectiveness of evasive action to avoid crashes in a counterfactual experiment.

Related papers

• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)
• SMURF-THP: Score Matching-based UnceRtainty quantiFication for Transformer Hawkes Process [76.98721879039559]
  We propose SMURF-THP, a score-based method for learning Transformer Hawkes process and quantifying prediction uncertainty. Specifically, SMURF-THP learns the score function of events' arrival time based on a score-matching objective. We conduct extensive experiments in both event type prediction and uncertainty quantification of arrival time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T03:33:45Z)
• Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [53.10194953873209]
  We show how to leverage proxy criticality metrics to generate safety margins. We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T16:49:54Z)
• Forecasting Particle Accelerator Interruptions Using Logistic LASSO Regression [62.997667081978825]
  Unforeseen particle accelerator interruptions, also known as interlocks, lead to abrupt operational changes despite being necessary safety measures. We propose a simple yet powerful binary classification model aiming to forecast such interruptions. The model is formulated as logistic regression penalized by at least absolute shrinkage and selection operator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T23:11:30Z)
• A Probabilistic Framework for Estimating the Risk of Pedestrian-Vehicle Conflicts at Intersections [5.8366275205801985]
  This study proposes a probabilistic framework for estimating the risk of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at intersections. The proposed framework loosens restrictions of constant speed by predicting trajectories using a Gaussian Process Regression. Real-world LiDAR data collected at an intersection was used to evaluate the performance of the proposed framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-28T15:08:41Z)
• Prediction-Based Reachability Analysis for Collision Risk Assessment on Highways [18.18842948832662]
  This paper introduces a prediction-based collision risk assessment approach on highways. We develop an acceleration prediction model, which provides multi-modal probabilistic acceleration distributions to propagate vehicle states. The proposed collision detection approach is agile and effective to identify the collision in cut-in crash events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T07:58:02Z)
• Fail-Safe Adversarial Generative Imitation Learning [9.594432031144716]
  We propose a safety layer that enables a closed-form probability density/gradient of the safe generative continuous policy, end-to-end generative adversarial training, and worst-case safety guarantees. The safety layer maps all actions into a set of safe actions, and uses the change-of-variables formula plus additivity of measures for the density. In an experiment on real-world driver interaction data, we empirically demonstrate tractability, safety and imitation performance of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T13:03:06Z)
• ProBF: Learning Probabilistic Safety Certificates with Barrier Functions [31.203344483485843]
  The control barrier function is a useful tool to guarantee safety if we have access to the ground-truth system dynamics. In practice, we have inaccurate knowledge of the system dynamics, which can lead to unsafe behaviors. We show the efficacy of this method through experiments on Segway and Quadrotor simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T20:18:18Z)
• Exact and Bounded Collision Probability for Motion Planning under Gaussian Uncertainty [1.3535770763481902]
  We present an approach for computing the collision probability under Gaussian distributed motion. The collision condition is formulated as the distance between ellipsoids. We provide a tight upper bound that can be computed much faster during online planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T20:45:18Z)
• Multivariate Probabilistic Regression with Natural Gradient Boosting [63.58097881421937]
  We propose a Natural Gradient Boosting (NGBoost) approach based on nonparametrically modeling the conditional parameters of the multivariate predictive distribution. Our method is robust, works out-of-the-box without extensive tuning, is modular with respect to the assumed target distribution, and performs competitively in comparison to existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T17:44:49Z)
• Generating and Characterizing Scenarios for Safety Testing of Autonomous Vehicles [86.9067793493874]
  We propose efficient mechanisms to characterize and generate testing scenarios using a state-of-the-art driving simulator. We use our method to characterize real driving data from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) project. We rank the scenarios by defining metrics based on the complexity of avoiding accidents and provide insights into how the AV could have minimized the probability of incurring an accident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T17:00:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.