How Do the Probabilities Arise in Quantum Measurement?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.10624v1
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:58:52 GMT
- Title: How Do the Probabilities Arise in Quantum Measurement?
- Authors: Mani L. Bhaumik
- Abstract summary: A satisfactory resolution of the persistent quantum measurement problem remains stubbornly unresolved in spite of an overabundance of efforts.
This article attempts to provide a plausible answer to this enigma, thus eventually making progress toward a cogent solution of the longstanding measurement problem.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: A satisfactory resolution of the persistent quantum measurement problem
remains stubbornly unresolved in spite of an overabundance of efforts of many
prominent scientists over the decades. Among others, one key element is
considered yet to be resolved. It comprises of where the probabilities of the
measurement outcome stem from. This article attempts to provide a plausible
answer to this enigma, thus eventually making progress toward a cogent solution
of the longstanding measurement problem.
Related papers
- A decision-theoretic approach to dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics [42.166654559515244]
We provide a decision-theoretic framework for dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics.
We show that measurements play the role of acts with an uncertain outcome.
We discuss the mathematical implications of our findings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-26T14:53:06Z) - Entanglement and purity can help to detect systematic experimental errors [28.632544413532923]
We develop a direct and efficient method to detect systematic errors in quantum experiments.
Our results show that entanglement as well as quantum states with a high purity can help to identify systematic errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T15:05:06Z) - Resolving the Quantum Measurement Problem through Leveraging the Uncertainty Principle [0.0]
The Schrodinger equation is incomplete, inherently unable to explain the collapse of the wavefunction caused by measurement.
We show that in phase space quantum mechanics, uncertainty can be arbitrarily adjusted by tuning the observation window.
Our framework bridges seemingly disparate concepts such as classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, decoherence, and measurement within intrinsic quantum mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-13T19:56:21Z) - Table-top nanodiamond interferometer enabling quantum gravity tests [34.82692226532414]
We present a feasibility study for a table-top nanodiamond-based interferometer.
By relying on quantum superpositions of steady massive objects our interferometer may allow exploiting just small-range electromagnetic fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T17:20:59Z) - Entanglement detection length of multipartite quantum states [18.335755852205732]
We introduce the concept of entanglement detection length, defined as the minimum number of particles that have to be jointly measured.
We show that the entanglement detection length is generally smaller than the minimum observable length needed to uniquely determine a multipartite state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-07T02:13:47Z) - Enhanced Entanglement in the Measurement-Altered Quantum Ising Chain [46.99825956909532]
Local quantum measurements do not simply disentangle degrees of freedom, but may actually strengthen the entanglement in the system.
This paper explores how a finite density of local measurement modifies a given state's entanglement structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T09:51:00Z) - Six Measurement Problems of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
We argue that no less than six problems need to be distinguished, and that several of them classify as different types of problems.
One of them is what traditionally is called the measurement problem'
Another of them has nothing to do with measurements but is a profound metaphysical problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-17T13:29:23Z) - Quantum Discord Witness with Uncharacterized Devices [18.751513188036334]
We propose a new approach using uncharacterized measurements to witness quantum discord of an unknown bipartite state within arbitrary dimension system.
The feature of high robustness against device imperfections, such as loss-tolerance and error-tolerance, shows our method is experimentally feasible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-20T14:51:53Z) - Do We Have Any Viable Solution to the Measurement Problem? [0.0]
A number of popular approaches to the measurement problem can't be fully extended to relativistic quantum mechanics.
This article seeks to understand in general terms what such a thing might look like.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-15T21:21:34Z) - Can Decoherence Solve the Measurement Problem? [0.0]
The quantum decoherence program has become more attractive in providing an acceptable solution for the long-standing quantum measurement problem.
Recent experimental observations of the effect of the ubiquitous quantum vacuum fluctuations in destroying quantum entanglement appears to provide a solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-05T09:32:35Z) - Variational Quantum Metrology with Loschmidt Echo [20.002455345052702]
We propose a scalable scheme with a symmetrical variational quantum circuit which, same as the Loschmidt echo, consists of a forward and a backward evolution.
We show that in this scheme the quantum Fisher information, which quantifies the precision limit, can be efficiently obtained from a measurement signal of the Loschmidt echo.
We experimentally implement the scheme on an ensemble of 10-spin quantum processor and successfully achieves a precision near the theoretical limit which outperforms the standard quantum limit with 12.4 dB.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-22T14:21:59Z) - What does it take to solve the measurement problem? [0.0]
We show that no current interpretation of quantum mechanics solves the measurement problem.
We speculate what a solution of the measurement problem might be good for.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-21T14:49:42Z) - On a gap in the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma and its
consequences for the reversibility of quantum resources [51.243733928201024]
We show that the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma is not correct due to a gap in the argument leading to Lemma III.9.
This puts into question a number of established results in the literature, in particular the reversibility of quantum entanglement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-05T17:46:05Z) - Quantum Buzzwords [0.0]
Some of these problems are briefly described and resolutions suggested from the decoherent (or consistent) histories quantum mechanics of closed systems like the Universe.
Some of these problems are briefly described and resolutions suggested from the decoherent (or consistent) histories quantum mechanics of closed systems like the Universe.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-09T18:50:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.