How Do the Probabilities Arise in Quantum Measurement?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.10624v1
• Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:58:52 GMT
• Title: How Do the Probabilities Arise in Quantum Measurement?
• Authors: Mani L. Bhaumik
• Abstract summary: A satisfactory resolution of the persistent quantum measurement problem remains stubbornly unresolved in spite of an overabundance of efforts. This article attempts to provide a plausible answer to this enigma, thus eventually making progress toward a cogent solution of the longstanding measurement problem.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A satisfactory resolution of the persistent quantum measurement problem remains stubbornly unresolved in spite of an overabundance of efforts of many prominent scientists over the decades. Among others, one key element is considered yet to be resolved. It comprises of where the probabilities of the measurement outcome stem from. This article attempts to provide a plausible answer to this enigma, thus eventually making progress toward a cogent solution of the longstanding measurement problem.

Related papers

• Resolving the Quantum Measurement Problem through Leveraging the Uncertainty Principle [0.0]
  The Schrodinger equation is incomplete, inherently unable to explain the collapse of the wavefunction caused by measurement. We show that in phase space quantum mechanics, uncertainty can be arbitrarily adjusted by tuning the observation window. Our framework bridges seemingly disparate concepts such as classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, decoherence, and measurement within intrinsic quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T19:56:21Z)
• A variational quantum algorithm by Bayesian Inference with von Mises-Fisher distribution [16.974415282194027]
  We present a novel approach that employs Bayesian inference principles together with von Mises-Fisher distribution. We theoretically demonstrate the new algorithm's capability in identifying the ground state with certain for various random Hamiltonian matrices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T03:57:19Z)
• Table-top nanodiamond interferometer enabling quantum gravity tests [34.82692226532414]
  We present a feasibility study for a table-top nanodiamond-based interferometer. By relying on quantum superpositions of steady massive objects our interferometer may allow exploiting just small-range electromagnetic fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T17:20:59Z)
• Entanglement detection length of multipartite quantum states [18.335755852205732]
  We introduce the concept of entanglement detection length, defined as the minimum number of particles that have to be jointly measured. We show that the entanglement detection length is generally smaller than the minimum observable length needed to uniquely determine a multipartite state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-07T02:13:47Z)
• Enhanced Entanglement in the Measurement-Altered Quantum Ising Chain [43.80709028066351]
  Local quantum measurements do not simply disentangle degrees of freedom, but may actually strengthen the entanglement in the system. This paper explores how a finite density of local measurement modifies a given state's entanglement structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T09:51:00Z)
• Six Measurement Problems of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We argue that no less than six problems need to be distinguished, and that several of them classify as different types of problems. One of them is what traditionally is called the measurement problem' Another of them has nothing to do with measurements but is a profound metaphysical problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T13:29:23Z)
• Do We Have Any Viable Solution to the Measurement Problem? [0.0]
  A number of popular approaches to the measurement problem can't be fully extended to relativistic quantum mechanics. This article seeks to understand in general terms what such a thing might look like.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-15T21:21:34Z)
• Can Decoherence Solve the Measurement Problem? [0.0]
  The quantum decoherence program has become more attractive in providing an acceptable solution for the long-standing quantum measurement problem. Recent experimental observations of the effect of the ubiquitous quantum vacuum fluctuations in destroying quantum entanglement appears to provide a solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T09:32:35Z)
• On a gap in the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma and its consequences for the reversibility of quantum resources [51.243733928201024]
  We show that the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma is not correct due to a gap in the argument leading to Lemma III.9. This puts into question a number of established results in the literature, in particular the reversibility of quantum entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T17:46:05Z)
• Quantum Buzzwords [0.0]
  Some of these problems are briefly described and resolutions suggested from the decoherent (or consistent) histories quantum mechanics of closed systems like the Universe. Some of these problems are briefly described and resolutions suggested from the decoherent (or consistent) histories quantum mechanics of closed systems like the Universe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-09T18:50:00Z)
• Efficient computation of the Nagaoka--Hayashi bound for multi-parameter estimation with separable measurements [16.53410208934304]
  We introduce a tighter bound for estimating multiple parameters simultaneously when performing separable measurements on finite copies of the probe. We show that this bound can be efficiently computed by casting it as a semidefinite program.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-06T12:43:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.