Do We Have Any Viable Solution to the Measurement Problem?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.06192v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 21:21:34 GMT
• Title: Do We Have Any Viable Solution to the Measurement Problem?
• Authors: Emily Adlam
• Abstract summary: A number of popular approaches to the measurement problem can't be fully extended to relativistic quantum mechanics. This article seeks to understand in general terms what such a thing might look like.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Wallace (2022) has recently argued that a number of popular approaches to the measurement problem can't be fully extended to relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory; Wallace thus contends that as things currently stand, only the unitary-only approaches to the measurement problem are viable. However, the unitary-only approaches face serious epistemic problems which may threaten their viability as solutions, and thus we consider that it remains an urgent outstanding problem to find a viable solution to the measurement problem which can be extended to relativistic quantum mechanics. In this article we seek to understand in general terms what such a thing might look like. We argue that in order to avoid serious epistemic problems, the solution must be a single-world realist approach, and we further argue that any single-world realist approach which is able to reproduce the predictions of relativistic quantum mechanics will most likely have the property that our observable reality does not supervene on dynamical, precisely-defined microscopic beables. Thus we suggest three possible routes for further exploration: observable reality could be approximate and emergent, as in relational quantum mechanics with the addition of cross-perspective links, or observable reality could supervene on beables which are not microscopically defined, as in the consistent histories approach, or observable reality could supervene on beables which are not dynamical, as in Kent's solution to the Lorentzian classical reality problem. We conclude that once all of these issues are taken into account, the options for a viable solution to the measurement problem are significantly narrowed down.

Related papers

• Resolving the Quantum Measurement Problem through Leveraging the Uncertainty Principle [0.0]
  The Schrodinger equation is incomplete, inherently unable to explain the collapse of the wavefunction caused by measurement. We show that in phase space quantum mechanics, uncertainty can be arbitrarily adjusted by tuning the observation window. Our framework bridges seemingly disparate concepts such as classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, decoherence, and measurement within intrinsic quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T19:56:21Z)
• Speakable and unspeakable in quantum measurements [0.0]
  A new approach, based on so-called "weak measurements", suggests that such forbidden knowledge can be gained by studying the system's response to an inaccurate weakly perturbing device. It goes further to propose revising the whole concept of physics variables, and offers various examples of counterintuitive quantum behaviour. A new technique must either transcend the orthodox limits, or just prove that these limits are indeed necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T12:24:18Z)
• Everything is Entangled in Quantum Mechanics: Are the Orthodox Measures Physically Meaningful? [0.0]
  We will argue that this new line of research is capable not only to evade the many open problems which appear within the mainstream literature, but is also able to present a consistent and coherent physical understanding of entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T13:22:10Z)
• Causality and a possible interpretation of quantum mechanics [2.7398542529968477]
  Based on quantum field theory, our work provides a framework that harmoniously integrates relativistic causality, quantum non-locality, and quantum measurement. We use reduced density matrices to represent the local information of the quantum state and show that the reduced density matrices cannot evolve superluminally. Unlike recent approaches that focus on causality by introducing new operators to describe detectors, we consider that everything--including detectors, environments, and humans--is composed of the same fundamental fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T07:07:22Z)
• A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
  We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z)
• The measurement problem in the light of the theory of decoherence [0.0]
  This paper proposes an exhaustive solution to the measurement problem in view of the theory of decoherence. Considering the latter as a probabilistic theory all along allows us to avoid the usual probability problem of the many-worlds interpretations. A thorough verification of the consistency of quantum mechanics at all scales is proposed, as well as a discussion of what can be deemed an observer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T19:47:52Z)
• Unconventional mechanism of virtual-state population through dissipation [125.99533416395765]
  We report a phenomenon occurring in open quantum systems by which virtual states can acquire a sizable population in the long time limit. This means that the situation where the virtual state remains unpopulated can be metastable. We show how these results can be relevant for practical questions such as the generation of stable and metastable entangled states in dissipative systems of interacting qubits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-24T17:09:43Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
  We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations. We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)
• Einselection from incompatible decoherence channels [62.997667081978825]
  We analyze an open quantum dynamics inspired by CQED experiments with two non-commuting Lindblad operators. We show that Fock states remain the most robust states to decoherence up to a critical coupling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-29T14:15:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.