Predicting adverse outcomes following catheter ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.11965v2
• Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 02:57:41 GMT
• Title: Predicting adverse outcomes following catheter ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation
• Authors: Juan C. Quiroz, David Brieger, Louisa Jorm, Raymond W Sy, Benjumin Hsu, Blanca Gallego
• Abstract summary: We developed prognostic survival models for predicting adverse outcomes after catheter ablation treatment for AF. Traditional and deep survival models were trained to predict major bleeding events and a composite of heart failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, and death.
• Score: 2.202746751854349
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Objective: To develop prognostic survival models for predicting adverse outcomes after catheter ablation treatment for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We used a linked dataset including hospital administrative data, prescription medicine claims, emergency department presentations, and death registrations of patients in New South Wales, Australia. The cohort included patients who received catheter ablation for AF. Traditional and deep survival models were trained to predict major bleeding events and a composite of heart failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, and death. Results: Out of a total of 3285 patients in the cohort, 177 (5.3%) experienced the composite outcome (heart failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, death) and 167 (5.1%) experienced major bleeding events after catheter ablation treatment. Models predicting the composite outcome had high risk discrimination accuracy, with the best model having a concordance index > 0.79 at the evaluated time horizons. Models for predicting major bleeding events had poor risk discrimination performance, with all models having a concordance index < 0.66. The most impactful features for the models predicting higher risk were comorbidities indicative of poor health, older age, and therapies commonly used in sicker patients to treat heart failure and AF. Conclusions: Diagnosis and medication history did not contain sufficient information for precise risk prediction of experiencing major bleeding events. The models for predicting the composite outcome have the potential to enable clinicians to identify and manage high-risk patients following catheter ablation proactively. Future research is needed to validate the usefulness of these models in clinical practice.

Related papers

• Deep State-Space Generative Model For Correlated Time-to-Event Predictions [54.3637600983898]
  We propose a deep latent state-space generative model to capture the interactions among different types of correlated clinical events. Our method also uncovers meaningful insights about the latent correlations among mortality and different types of organ failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T02:42:36Z)
• SepsisLab: Early Sepsis Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification and Active Sensing [67.8991481023825]
  Sepsis is the leading cause of in-hospital mortality in the USA. Existing predictive models are usually trained on high-quality data with few missing information. For the potential high-risk patients with low confidence due to limited observations, we propose a robust active sensing algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T04:47:36Z)
• Using Pre-training and Interaction Modeling for ancestry-specific disease prediction in UK Biobank [69.90493129893112]
  Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered the genetic basis of complex traits, but show an under-representation of non-European descent individuals. Here, we assess whether we can improve disease prediction across diverse ancestries using multiomic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T16:39:50Z)
• Event-Based Contrastive Learning for Medical Time Series [11.696805672885798]
  Event-Based Contrastive Learning (EBCL) is a method for learning embeddings of heterogeneous patient data. We demonstrate that EBCL can be used to construct models that yield improved performance on important downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T03:50:24Z)
• Neurological Prognostication of Post-Cardiac-Arrest Coma Patients Using EEG Data: A Dynamic Survival Analysis Framework with Competing Risks [4.487368901635044]
  We propose a framework for neurological prognostication of post-cardiac-arrest comatose patients using EEG data. Our framework uses any dynamic survival analysis model that supports competing risks in the form of estimating patient-level cumulative incidence functions. We demonstrate our framework by benchmarking three existing dynamic survival analysis models that support competing risks on a real dataset of 922 patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T03:46:23Z)
• SurvLatent ODE : A Neural ODE based time-to-event model with competing risks for longitudinal data improves cancer-associated Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) prediction [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a generative time-to-event model, SurvLatent ODE, which parameterizes a latent representation under irregularly sampled data. Our model then utilizes the latent representation to flexibly estimate survival times for multiple competing events without specifying shapes of event-specific hazard function. SurvLatent ODE outperforms the current clinical standard Khorana Risk scores for stratifying DVT risk groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T17:28:08Z)
• Performance of multilabel machine learning models and risk stratification schemas for predicting stroke and bleeding risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation [22.45448597986172]
  Multilabel gradient boosting machine provided the best discriminant power for stroke, major bleeding, and death. Models identified additional risk features (such as hemoglobin level, renal function, etc.) for each outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T15:15:03Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• An explainable Transformer-based deep learning model for the prediction of incident heart failure [22.513476932615845]
  We developed a novel Transformer deep-learning model for prediction of incident heart failure involving 100,071 patients. The model achieved 0.93 and 0.93 area under the receiver operator curve and 0.69 and 0.70 area under the precision-recall curve. The importance of contextualised medical information was revealed in sensitivity analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T12:45:15Z)
• A Knowledge Distillation Ensemble Framework for Predicting Short and Long-term Hospitalisation Outcomes from Electronic Health Records Data [5.844828229178025]
  Existing outcome prediction models suffer from a low recall of infrequent positive outcomes. We present a highly-scalable and robust machine learning framework to automatically predict adversity represented by mortality and ICU admission.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-18T15:56:28Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.